11.02.2013 Views

PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Although <strong>of</strong>ten mediated through the experience <strong>of</strong> Great Britain, there are isolated sections<br />

<strong>of</strong> the textbook whereby the discourse <strong>of</strong> an independent Australian nation is expressed.<br />

Here, specific references to Australian traits and leaders are used such as, “magnificent<br />

heroism” and “General Birdwood commanded the Anzacs” (Dunlop & Palfrey, 1932a, p.<br />

110) articulate the beginning <strong>of</strong> an emergence <strong>of</strong> an Australian-ness, hitherto not seen in the<br />

textbooks outside <strong>of</strong> an interior or domestic context (for example, through narratives <strong>of</strong> early<br />

exploration). Whilst the examples <strong>of</strong> phrases provided here are only minor, later this<br />

developed into a stronger argument, and as evidenced from the extract below (Dunlop &<br />

Palfrey, 1932a, p. 159), WWI is overtly attributed to Australians creating a sense <strong>of</strong><br />

nationhood, from the perspective <strong>of</strong> patriotism. Here, nationhood is attributed not to a<br />

separation <strong>of</strong> Australia from the emotional ties to Great Britain, but rather because all the<br />

separate states (which only two decades previously had been separate colonies not part <strong>of</strong> one<br />

nation) became closer as a result <strong>of</strong> this unifying event. The textbook describes:<br />

It has been said that the Great War made Australia a nation. Before 1914, the<br />

majority <strong>of</strong> Australians were inclined to think <strong>of</strong> themselves as Queenslanders, or<br />

Victorians, or Tasmanians, and so on, rather than as Australians. The war changed<br />

that. (Dunlop & Palfrey, 1932a, p. 159)<br />

The connection to Great Britain is still maintained, and a quote from Henry Parkes, widely<br />

regarded as the ‘Father <strong>of</strong> Federation’ (he died before 1901, but was a significant and active<br />

supporter <strong>of</strong> the Federation movement) is used to justify and maintain an Australian<br />

connection to Great Britain, by stating:<br />

The sacrifices made by every part <strong>of</strong> the Commonwealth in the terrible conflict made<br />

Australians realize more fully the meaning <strong>of</strong> Sir Henry Parkes’ historic phrase, “the<br />

crimson thread <strong>of</strong> kinship runs through us all”. (Dunlop & Palfrey, 1932a, p. 159)<br />

Whilst Australian states came together to form a nation, the British-ness <strong>of</strong> Australians was<br />

still maintained. The idea <strong>of</strong> the birth <strong>of</strong> a nation as a result <strong>of</strong> Australia’s participation in<br />

WWI is given further weighting in an extract on the Gallipoli campaign (see Source 5.5).<br />

172

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!