PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ... PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

eprints.usq.edu.au
from eprints.usq.edu.au More from this publisher
11.02.2013 Views

demands. But if they spoke with a united voice the “inaudible squeaks” of the six separate colonies would be magnified into one combined “loud speaker” that would compel attention. (4) ... (5) ... (Cramp, 1927, p. 189) Two of the five reasons given for Australia’s federation are to do with Australia’s connection to Great Britain; one for existing connections and one for future or planned connections. A link to British heritages is given as the primary reason for Federation, with point one stating: “British settlements should feel a common interest because of their common race. They should come closer together, and not drift apart” (Cramp, 1927, p. 189, emphasis added). Here, those who personally have British heritages (family, ancestry) are legitimised as Australians and having a voice in Australian political decisions. All other groups are silenced and excluded, including Indigenous Australians. It is through the “common race” (Cramp, 1927, p. 189) of being British that Federation is justified. Given that the majority of Australians at this time were of British heritages (although ‘British’ in itself is not a monoculture despite being presented in this way), this can be seen as representative of the general population, however all other voices are excluded. The second point of British heritages being viewed as a reason for Federation is articulated as a future or planned connection with Great Britain, sometimes articulated as “England” (Cramp, 1927, p. 189). Here, it is argued that as one nation rather than separate colonies, England and other nations would be more likely to listen to the perspectives of Australia. This is articulated by emphasising that the weaknesses of separate colonies “the “inaudible squeaks” of the six separate colonies” (Cramp, 1927, p. 189, emphasis added) would instead be made stronger, “magnified into one combined “loud speaker” that would compel attention” (Cramp, 1927, p. 189, emphasis added). Therefore, it is through strength of unity that Federation is justified. Furthermore, although not articulated overtly, Australia is presented as having an interest in being heard by other nations; not as a weak nation, but rather one that wants to have “influence with the rest of the world” (Cramp, 1927, p. 189). 5.8 Category 5: World War I Due to the enormity of this topic, and also being a focal point for this dissertation’s research for this era, WWI is organized within its own stand alone category. Within this, various 166

discourses present, and although there may be some connection with discourses from other categories, it is argued that due to being mediated through the context of WWI, they present as separate to other discourses for the purposes of this analysis. Through this category, the static nature of the syllabus is apparent. Australia’s involvement in WWI was included in the British history section of the History textbook, as there was no space made for the inclusion of this content in the Australian history section. This is possibly done as a decision by the Department of Public Instruction and textbook authors to react against the static nature of the syllabus of the time. For, although the syllabus did not have any space for this conflict, perhaps realizing its importance, space was created to discuss Australia’s involvement in WWI. New syllabus history for seventh grade (Dunlop & Palfrey, 1932a), portrays the involvement of Australia in WWI more as a footnote to the battles of WWI. Whilst it is important not to overstate Australia’s contribution to this conflict, which in comparison to other nations was small, given the Australian school audience it is not unreasonable an expectation that there would be more Australia-centric content. Not doing this is a sentiment supported by Australia’s official war historian for WWI, C.E.W. Bean in the extract below. From the point of view of the reader in other countries, a history of the part played by Australia in the Great War must inevitably be but a partial history. The role of the Australian people and of its armed forces fitted into the larger role of the whole British people much as the part of Britain fitted into the great drama enacted by the full “cast” of the Allies. As the historian of the British share in the Battle of the Marne may be in danger of making that share appear to have been the pivot of the whole campaign, so, and to an even greater degree, the Australian historian may run the risk of so constructing the entire conflict that it seems to centre upon that part of it with which he deals. (Bean, 1921, p. xxv) To place this important aspect of Australia’s history within the section on British History, demonstrates the lasting connection Australia had with Great Britain; particularly given the syllabus that informed this textbook was instigated in Queensland schools from 1930, 11 years after the end of WWI. 167

demands. But if they spoke with a united voice the “inaudible squeaks” <strong>of</strong> the six<br />

separate colonies would be magnified into one combined “loud speaker” that would<br />

compel attention.<br />

(4) ...<br />

(5) ... (Cramp, 1927, p. 189)<br />

Two <strong>of</strong> the five reasons given for Australia’s federation are to do with Australia’s connection<br />

to Great Britain; one for existing connections and one for future or planned connections. A<br />

link to British heritages is given as the primary reason for Federation, with point one stating:<br />

“British settlements should feel a common interest because <strong>of</strong> their common race. They<br />

should come closer together, and not drift apart” (Cramp, 1927, p. 189, emphasis added).<br />

Here, those who personally have British heritages (family, ancestry) are legitimised as<br />

Australians and having a voice in Australian political decisions. All other groups are silenced<br />

and excluded, including Indigenous Australians. It is through the “common race” (Cramp,<br />

1927, p. 189) <strong>of</strong> being British that Federation is justified. Given that the majority <strong>of</strong><br />

Australians at this time were <strong>of</strong> British heritages (although ‘British’ in itself is not a<br />

monoculture despite being presented in this way), this can be seen as representative <strong>of</strong> the<br />

general population, however all other voices are excluded.<br />

The second point <strong>of</strong> British heritages being viewed as a reason for Federation is articulated as<br />

a future or planned connection with Great Britain, sometimes articulated as “England”<br />

(Cramp, 1927, p. 189). Here, it is argued that as one nation rather than separate colonies,<br />

England and other nations would be more likely to listen to the perspectives <strong>of</strong> Australia.<br />

This is articulated by emphasising that the weaknesses <strong>of</strong> separate colonies “the “inaudible<br />

squeaks” <strong>of</strong> the six separate colonies” (Cramp, 1927, p. 189, emphasis added) would instead<br />

be made stronger, “magnified into one combined “loud speaker” that would compel<br />

attention” (Cramp, 1927, p. 189, emphasis added). Therefore, it is through strength <strong>of</strong> unity<br />

that Federation is justified. Furthermore, although not articulated overtly, Australia is<br />

presented as having an interest in being heard by other nations; not as a weak nation, but<br />

rather one that wants to have “influence with the rest <strong>of</strong> the world” (Cramp, 1927, p. 189).<br />

5.8 Category 5: World War I<br />

Due to the enormity <strong>of</strong> this topic, and also being a focal point for this dissertation’s research<br />

for this era, WWI is organized within its own stand alone category. Within this, various<br />

166

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!