11.02.2013 Views

PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter One: Introduction<br />

1.1 Introduction<br />

History is highly political, as both a discipline and the experience people have <strong>of</strong> it,<br />

especially collective remembering <strong>of</strong> past and public events. This has been demonstrated in<br />

recent years through the (so called) history/culture wars; debates that have proliferated both<br />

in Australia and internationally. The purposes <strong>of</strong> teaching national history in schools and the<br />

content selected to do so, has been at the forefront <strong>of</strong> many <strong>of</strong> these public debates. As<br />

observed by Slater, “history is an <strong>of</strong>ten unsettling and sometimes uncomfortable subject. It is<br />

controversial and <strong>of</strong>ten very sensitive. There is some consensus about its importance in the<br />

school curriculum but much less agreement about what it is for” (as cited in Lévesque, 2007,<br />

p. 349). How content <strong>of</strong> history is actualized in school curriculum is the focus <strong>of</strong> this project,<br />

in particular how it relates to dominant socio-political contexts.<br />

A ‘flashpoint’ <strong>of</strong> the connection between these public debates and schooling in the Australian<br />

state <strong>of</strong> Queensland hit a peak in 2000-2001. The sole state-based newspaper, The Courier<br />

Mail, initiated what has become a long running debate between its journalists, columnists,<br />

academics, teachers, parents, education department <strong>of</strong>ficials and the general public about the<br />

purposes <strong>of</strong> a new school subject—Study <strong>of</strong> Society and its Environment (SOSE)—and,<br />

specifically the underlying philosophies that influenced its construction and the core content<br />

selected for school students to learn. The Courier Mail went so far as taking the unusual step<br />

<strong>of</strong> publishing the entire SOSE syllabus and quoting extensive sections from it in articles<br />

throughout 2000 in order to persuade readers to adopt an oppositional perspective to the new<br />

Syllabus. The perspective was, in part, that the Syllabus was far too progressive to be used in<br />

schools to teach students important topics such as Australian history (see Hoepper et al.,<br />

2000, for a response to reporting <strong>of</strong> the syllabus in The Courier Mail, including claims <strong>of</strong><br />

alleged political prejudice). These debates were also carried out in other states and by The<br />

Australian, the newspaper with the largest readership in Australia. SOSE encompasses,<br />

amongst other subjects, History, Geography, and Citizenship Education. It is commonly<br />

viewed as a replacement for Social Studies in primary school and specialist subjects (such as<br />

History, Geography and Economics) in junior secondary school. Of interest, this dissertation<br />

is being written almost a decade since that syllabus was introduced—and despite public<br />

campaigns calling for it to be replaced—it remains part <strong>of</strong> the core curriculum for students in<br />

years 1-10. My personal experiences <strong>of</strong> the highly public aspects <strong>of</strong> the debates facilitated<br />

1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!