11.02.2013 Views

PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

PDF (Whole Thesis) - USQ ePrints - University of Southern ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the project, enabled through a reflexivity process <strong>of</strong> identifying and communicating personal<br />

assumptions and ideologies. This term is selected largely for pragmatic reasons, as it is most<br />

commonly used in a postgraduate research thesis (and forms part <strong>of</strong> the structure provided by<br />

the institution where this dissertation was conducted). It is also selected as an umbrella term<br />

to describe the variety <strong>of</strong> disclosure <strong>of</strong> researcher theories and understandings drawn on,<br />

including practices such as reflexivity (Mulkay, 1985, Chouliaraki & Fairclough, 1999); and<br />

terms such as frame problem (Gee, 2004); in history described by Hexter as the second<br />

record (1971); and aspects <strong>of</strong> bricolage such as injecting a personal voice through an<br />

interpretive approach. More than a disclosure <strong>of</strong> researcher, injecting the personal voice into<br />

this project aligns with the ‘spirit’ <strong>of</strong> doing bricolage. Hexter describes the second record as<br />

…it embraces his [sic] skills, the range <strong>of</strong> his knowledge, the set <strong>of</strong> his mind, the<br />

substance, quality, and character <strong>of</strong> his experience – his total consciousness. Since no<br />

historian is identical with any other historian, what each historian brings, his second<br />

record, differs in some measure from the second record <strong>of</strong> every other historian.<br />

(1971, p. 104)<br />

In relating disclosure to a history methodology context, E.H. Carr asserts “…when we take<br />

up a work <strong>of</strong> history, our first concern should be not with the facts which it contains but with<br />

the historian who wrote it” (1990, p. 22). In order to present a thorough disclosure <strong>of</strong><br />

researcher, this section is divided into two parts. First, theories informing the development <strong>of</strong><br />

a disclosure <strong>of</strong> researcher are outlined aligned with the methodological approaches this<br />

dissertation takes. Second, the ways these theories are practically applied in this project are<br />

demonstrated. This is done so the reader can “…better understand the relationship between<br />

[my] ways <strong>of</strong> seeing and the social location <strong>of</strong> [my] personal history” (Kincheloe, 2008, p. 5).<br />

3.7.1 Theories informing disclosure.<br />

Bricolage, with its interest in pluralities and disaffection with positivist research, looks to<br />

poststructuralism to provide a theoretical framework which enables a multiplicity <strong>of</strong><br />

perspectives to be articulated, and to avoid a reliance on research which seeks to uncover<br />

grand narratives. Within the approaches <strong>of</strong> bricolage that this project adopts, disclosures <strong>of</strong><br />

the researcher feature as an important aspect in the research process. This link between<br />

poststructuralist research and disclosure <strong>of</strong> the researcher is made clear by McKenzie who<br />

writes:<br />

114

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!