11.02.2013 Views

CIB-W18 Timber Structures – A review of meeting 1-43 2 MATERIAL ...

CIB-W18 Timber Structures – A review of meeting 1-43 2 MATERIAL ...

CIB-W18 Timber Structures – A review of meeting 1-43 2 MATERIAL ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

25-17-3 D W Green, J W Evans<br />

Moisture content adjustment procedures for engineering standards<br />

Introduction<br />

Over the last 10 years, a considerable amount <strong>of</strong> work has been conducted<br />

at, or in cooperation with, the U.S. Forest Products Laboratory (FPL) on<br />

the effect <strong>of</strong> moisture content (MC) on the mechanical properties <strong>of</strong> standard<br />

38-mm (nominal 2-inch) thick structural lumber (Green and Evans,<br />

1989). These studies have shown that the change in properties with the<br />

change in MC is a function <strong>of</strong> lumber quality and that strength does not<br />

necessarily increase with decreasing MC. These studies have produced<br />

new analytical models for relating lumber properties to change in MC<br />

(Evans, et.al. 1986). Additional simplified models for incorporating this<br />

information into engineering design standards have been recently approved<br />

in the U.S. (ASTM, D1990) and replace analytical models given in<br />

ASTM D245. The FPL research, as well as research by Madsen (1975,<br />

1982) and H<strong>of</strong>fmeyer (1978), was used to establish proposed MC-property<br />

adjustment recommendations for Eurocode 5. The research on which the<br />

U.S. models for adjusting bending properties are based utilize test results<br />

from only two species: Douglas-fir and Southern Pine (McLain. et. al.,<br />

1984, and Aplin, et al., 1986). To evaluate the applicability <strong>of</strong> the D1990<br />

simplified adjustment procedure, and the proposed Eurocode 5 procedure,<br />

to other species a limited study was conducted on MC-bending property<br />

relationships for 38- by 89-mm (nominal 2-by 4-in.) lumber <strong>of</strong> five additional<br />

species (Green and Evans, 1991).<br />

The objective <strong>of</strong> this paper is to evaluate analytical models for describing<br />

the effect <strong>of</strong> change in MC on the bending properties nominal 2x4 dimension<br />

lumber for five additional species. This work is limited to models<br />

applicable to engineering design codes, and to MC's <strong>of</strong> 10-percent or<br />

more.<br />

Conclusions<br />

From the results <strong>of</strong> this study we conclude the following.<br />

1. For adjusting modulus <strong>of</strong> rupture for change in MC, any <strong>of</strong> the better<br />

models provides a better property estimate than taking no adjustment.<br />

The adoption <strong>of</strong> some MC-MOR adjustment model would be especially<br />

important for the higher stress class levels.<br />

2. The simple linear model <strong>of</strong> ASTM D1990 is recommended. Its use<br />

should be restricted to MC's above about 10. The results <strong>of</strong> this study<br />

suggest that the upper limit <strong>of</strong> the adjustment be the values determined<br />

in this paper, or 2% for untested species.<br />

3. For modulus <strong>of</strong> elasticity either the constant percentage model <strong>of</strong><br />

ASTM D1990, or a constant percentage model <strong>of</strong> the type used to compute<br />

compound interest be adopted . The value should be based on<br />

those chosen for MOR.<br />

4. There is a need to go back and re-evaluate the full Douglas-fir and<br />

Southern Pine MC-MOR data sets using the knowledge gained in this<br />

study. This work is in progress.<br />

27-17-1 R H Leicester, H O Breitinger<br />

Statistical control <strong>of</strong> timber strength<br />

Introduction<br />

In comparison with most other structural materials, the strength <strong>of</strong> stressgraded<br />

timber is highly variable. Because <strong>of</strong> this, timber strength is defined<br />

in statistical terms. Typically, it is defined as the five-percentile value<br />

<strong>of</strong> a stress-graded population.<br />

In order to ensure reasonable confidence in obtaining the specified<br />

strength <strong>of</strong> this highly variable material, frequent strength measurements<br />

are made as part <strong>of</strong> quality control systems. In drafting Australian Standards,<br />

the following types <strong>of</strong> quality control measurements are under consideration:<br />

<strong>–</strong> in-grade evaluation: a complete evaluation <strong>of</strong> all significant structural<br />

properties for all grades and sizes;<br />

<strong>–</strong> annual check: an in-grade evaluation <strong>of</strong> a limited set <strong>of</strong> properties to<br />

ensure that there has not been a drift in the quality <strong>of</strong> the output <strong>of</strong> a<br />

mill;<br />

<strong>–</strong> daily check: a special structural test on a small sample to ensure that the<br />

stress-grading process is in control;<br />

<strong>–</strong> random check: a limited set <strong>of</strong> in-grade tests by a customer who may<br />

suspect that the quality <strong>of</strong> timber is below the quality claimed by the<br />

producer.<br />

The relative frequencies <strong>of</strong> these four types <strong>of</strong> measurements are illustrated<br />

in Figure 1. In the above, the terminology 'annual check' and 'daily<br />

check' are used as descriptors to provide a rough guide as to the frequency<br />

requirements <strong>of</strong> this type <strong>of</strong> check. The actual frequency <strong>of</strong> checks <strong>of</strong> any<br />

<strong>CIB</strong>-<strong>W18</strong> <strong>Timber</strong> <strong>Structures</strong> <strong>–</strong> A <strong>review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>meeting</strong> 1-<strong>43</strong> 2 <strong>MATERIAL</strong> PROPERTIES page 2.79

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!