11.02.2013 Views

CIB-W18 Timber Structures – A review of meeting 1-43 2 MATERIAL ...

CIB-W18 Timber Structures – A review of meeting 1-43 2 MATERIAL ...

CIB-W18 Timber Structures – A review of meeting 1-43 2 MATERIAL ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

when a dry period is followed by a humid period, and both periods are<br />

long.<br />

When the effect <strong>of</strong> moisture changes is compared to the effect <strong>of</strong> mechanical<br />

loading, we can conclude that the moisture load caused by the analysed<br />

cycles corresponds to an extra load <strong>of</strong> 0.15 to 0.35 MPa when acting<br />

simultaneously with a mechanical load causing stress <strong>of</strong> 0.2 MPa,<br />

when the beam is not surface coated. A good coating will decrease the<br />

moisture load by 70 %. A single fast change from 65 % RH to 90 % RH<br />

seems to be more effective than the test cycles analysed.<br />

While moisture gradients proved to be more important than realised in<br />

advance, some other factors appeared to be less important: creep after several<br />

moisture cycles seems not to change the level <strong>of</strong> stresses from that <strong>of</strong><br />

the first cycle. Accordingly, for the analysis <strong>of</strong> the duration <strong>of</strong> load behaviour<br />

under tensile stress perpendicular to grain, it is <strong>of</strong> great importance to<br />

consider the largest moisture cycle or change. All other duration <strong>of</strong> load<br />

effects are <strong>of</strong> much less importance and can well be estimated on the basis<br />

<strong>of</strong> the traditional stress ratio vs. log time to failure graph based on ideal<br />

constant humidity experiments. Under ideal constant conditions duration<br />

<strong>of</strong> load effect in tension perpendicular to grain is slightly less severe than<br />

suggested by the Madison curve.<br />

Volume effect during long term loading is found to be <strong>of</strong> the same order<br />

than adopted in Eurocode 5. The strength <strong>of</strong> a curved beam in comparison<br />

to a tensile specimen is higher than expected justifying the use <strong>of</strong> a<br />

higher kdis value, 1.85 for curved beams. On the other hand kmod factors<br />

should be lower, about 0.5 for medium and long term loads, or an additional<br />

moisture load should be calculated, depending on the surface coating<br />

or impregnation <strong>of</strong> curved beams.<br />

32-9-1 P Becker, K Rautenstrauch<br />

Bending-stress-redistribution in tension and compression and resulting<br />

DOL-effect<br />

Introduction<br />

Creep is generally assumed to be larger for compression than for tension to<br />

some degree. This results in a change <strong>of</strong> stress-distribution. The stress for<br />

the tension edge will increase and decrease for the compression edge. An<br />

analytical solution <strong>of</strong> this behaviour can be easily derived with the assumption<br />

<strong>of</strong> creep limits for both impacts.<br />

The resulting stress-distribution will lead to a decreasing computational<br />

bending strength value, because the stress for the tension edge, which will<br />

be finally responsible for failure, has already increased during lifetime <strong>of</strong> a<br />

structural element. The exact difference can be determined by simulation.<br />

For initial and resulting stress-distribution load increments are applied until<br />

tension strength is reached for the tension edge. Plasticating ability <strong>of</strong><br />

wood subjected to compression is considered.<br />

Conclusion<br />

Different creep in tension and compression was observed by many researchers.<br />

The exact difference can hardly be quantified because it strongly<br />

depends on climatic and loading conditions and also on the quality <strong>of</strong><br />

the material.<br />

It generally leads to changing edge stresses, which under the assumption<br />

<strong>of</strong> linear viscoelasticity can be easily determined using creep factors.<br />

If certain factors are given for compression and tension creep a bending<br />

creep factor, which is slightly lower than the mean <strong>of</strong> tension and compression<br />

creep, can be determined also.<br />

Because <strong>of</strong> the strong ability <strong>of</strong> the material to plasticise under compression,<br />

the influence <strong>of</strong> an increasing tension stress on the duration-<strong>of</strong>load<br />

phenomenon turns out to be quite low, almost negligible for normal<br />

and high quality material. Taking timber <strong>of</strong> low quality, the influence becomes<br />

larger; a big difference in tension an compression creep can rather<br />

be not expected for this kind <strong>of</strong> material though.<br />

32-9-2 R Grantham, V Enjily<br />

The long term performance <strong>of</strong> ply-web beams<br />

Abstract<br />

Ply-web beams have been used for a number <strong>of</strong> years in floor and flat ro<strong>of</strong><br />

constructions, such as swimming pools, that require medium-span structural<br />

beams. Many <strong>of</strong> the advantages associated with ply-web beams stem<br />

from their structural efficiency, utilising structural timber flanges and plywood<br />

webs. This produces lightweight components that are easily installed<br />

on site and reduce the dead weight <strong>of</strong> construction when compared to solid<br />

timber beams. The design <strong>of</strong> ply-web beams has been thoroughly investigated<br />

with the exception <strong>of</strong> their long-term performance. Very few studies<br />

have covered this aspect <strong>of</strong> design, which may be critical in service condi-<br />

<strong>CIB</strong>-<strong>W18</strong> <strong>Timber</strong> <strong>Structures</strong> <strong>–</strong> A <strong>review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>meeting</strong> 1-<strong>43</strong> 2 <strong>MATERIAL</strong> PROPERTIES page 2.67

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!