CIB-W18 Timber Structures – A review of meeting 1-43 2 MATERIAL ...
CIB-W18 Timber Structures – A review of meeting 1-43 2 MATERIAL ...
CIB-W18 Timber Structures – A review of meeting 1-43 2 MATERIAL ...
- TAGS
- timber
- structures
- cib-w18.com
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
24-9-1 T Toratti<br />
Long term bending creep <strong>of</strong> wood<br />
Summary<br />
Long term creep and recovery test results <strong>of</strong> wood in a bending load <strong>of</strong> 10<br />
MPa stress and subjected to relative humidity cycling are analysed. A<br />
mechanosorptive model that fits the test results is proposed. Simulated<br />
values <strong>of</strong> creep at ten years <strong>of</strong> loading are presented using the model. According<br />
to the model, the for bending deflection can be about doubled to<br />
account <strong>of</strong> the creep <strong>of</strong> ten years loading with a cyclic load <strong>of</strong> 10 -3 MPa<br />
and subjected to a natural outdoor relative humidity.<br />
Conclusions<br />
Creep test results <strong>of</strong> very long load duration and subjected to a high number<br />
<strong>of</strong> relative humidity cycles are analysed. The results do not seem to<br />
support the existence <strong>of</strong> a mechano-sorptive creep limit. Recovery <strong>of</strong> deformation<br />
does not seem to be complete but is to a certain extent <strong>of</strong> plastic<br />
nature. The irrecoverable deformation increases as mechano-sorptive creep<br />
increases. A mechanosorptive model is presented based on the above observations.<br />
The simulation <strong>of</strong> the bending creep <strong>of</strong> wood in natural outdoor environment<br />
conditions, using the model presented, results in the following<br />
relative creep and kcreep values:<br />
Definitions: e(t) = (1 + kcreep) σ / E<br />
Relative creep: Total deformation per elastic deformation.<br />
Loading Relative<br />
ceep<br />
kcreep<br />
Solid wood Constant 10 MPa 2.75 1.75<br />
44 x 94 mm 2 Cyclic 10 -3 MPa 2.20 1.20<br />
Glulam Constant 10 MPa 2.40 1.40<br />
190 x 1460 mm 2 Cyclic 10 -3 MPa 2.00 1.00<br />
24-9-2 A Ranta-Maunus<br />
Collection <strong>of</strong> creep data <strong>of</strong> timber<br />
Creep data<br />
A collection <strong>of</strong> existing creep data <strong>of</strong> timber is made in order to assist code<br />
writers. Only experiments with direct relevance to structures are included:<br />
structural size, allowable stress level and minimum duration <strong>of</strong> load 6<br />
months.<br />
Data is given in tables, and the values are expressed in terms <strong>of</strong> kcreep<br />
defined by<br />
� creep �<br />
E � 1 � k �/<br />
E<br />
Data is divided into 3 climatic groups:<br />
<strong>–</strong> artificially controlled in order to keep constant humidity<br />
<strong>–</strong> naturally changing humidity<br />
<strong>–</strong> artificially controlled to have strong cyclic variation<br />
In some cases values for 50 years are calculated by the models given in the<br />
articles. For joints only data concerning nail-plate connections is collected.<br />
Ufortunately, very little creep data related to service class 3 (Eurocode<br />
5) has been available.<br />
24-9-3 I R Kliger<br />
Deformation modification factors for calculating built-up wood-based<br />
structures<br />
The main purpose <strong>of</strong> this paper is to discuss the use <strong>of</strong> creep factors kcreep<br />
when calculating deflection in built-up structures.<br />
Conclusion<br />
It is obviously very difficult for the code writers to have general rules and<br />
recommendations and to cover all the possible and "impossible" design<br />
cases at the same time. However, most timber members are built into a<br />
structure in one way or another. Most structural elements with various material<br />
and joint combinations can be designed with high accuracy at the initial<br />
stage. In this case, the differences in the calculated and actual initial<br />
deflection caused by high scatter in the modulus <strong>of</strong> elasticity in timber and<br />
timber-based materials are not the subject <strong>of</strong> this paper. When the effects<br />
<strong>CIB</strong>-<strong>W18</strong> <strong>Timber</strong> <strong>Structures</strong> <strong>–</strong> A <strong>review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>meeting</strong> 1-<strong>43</strong> 2 <strong>MATERIAL</strong> PROPERTIES page 2.63