11.02.2013 Views

CIB-W18 Timber Structures – A review of meeting 1-43 2 MATERIAL ...

CIB-W18 Timber Structures – A review of meeting 1-43 2 MATERIAL ...

CIB-W18 Timber Structures – A review of meeting 1-43 2 MATERIAL ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Conclusion<br />

The relation between the bending strength <strong>of</strong> glulam and that <strong>of</strong> the finger<br />

joints seemsto depend on several factors. Among these are partly the size<br />

<strong>of</strong> the finger joints represented for example by the thickness <strong>of</strong> the lamination,<br />

partly the relation between the strength <strong>of</strong> the finger joint and that <strong>of</strong><br />

the rest <strong>of</strong> the lamination. This could be explained by the fact that the<br />

weak finger joint is brittle and the surrounding wood is in the linear state<br />

so stress redistribution will not take place.<br />

23-12-4 H Riberholt, J Ehlbeck, A Fewell<br />

Contribution to the determination <strong>of</strong> the bending strength <strong>of</strong> glulam<br />

beams<br />

Preface and explanation<br />

In the draft it has been necessary to introduce 2 tables <strong>of</strong> strength classes,one<br />

for glulam with a homogeneous cross-section and one for glulam<br />

where different lamination grades have been combined in the crosssection.<br />

The last mentioned is frequently employed in practise and it could<br />

be preferable to standardise this set <strong>of</strong> strength classes.<br />

Another possibility would be to have more classes so that homogeneous<br />

and combined grades could be included in the same table <strong>of</strong> classes. But<br />

this solution would give some problem with the setting <strong>of</strong> the strength values<br />

for axial tension and compression. These would have to be set at a rather<br />

low level in order to cater for the combined grade glulam with the low<br />

quality inner laminations. This would penalise homogeneous glulam.<br />

Introduction<br />

A strength class system enables combinations <strong>of</strong> grade and species having<br />

similar strength properties to be classified together with a common set <strong>of</strong><br />

strength properties. Such a system simplifies the process <strong>of</strong> marketing<br />

structural timber by reducing the number <strong>of</strong> options at the specification/supply<br />

interface.<br />

24-12-1 F Colling, J Ehlbeck, R Görlacher<br />

Contribution to the determination <strong>of</strong> the bending strength <strong>of</strong> glulam<br />

beams<br />

Introduction<br />

This paper intends to summarize the results <strong>of</strong> the extensive research work<br />

done in Karlsruhe (Germany) on the bending strength <strong>of</strong> glulam beams.<br />

Above all it is the aim <strong>of</strong> this essay to develop design rules for glulam<br />

beams under bending.<br />

The bending strength <strong>of</strong> glulam beams is primarily governed by two<br />

properties:<br />

<strong>–</strong> the quality <strong>of</strong> the laminations used;<br />

<strong>–</strong> the strength <strong>of</strong> the finger joints<br />

This is repeatedly demonstrated and proved by numerous tests in different<br />

countries. In order to make the problem easier to understand how the<br />

bending strength <strong>of</strong> glulam beams is influenced by mixing these two properties,<br />

it seems useful to consider first <strong>of</strong> all both effects separately.<br />

Conclusion<br />

It can be summarized that for aiming at certain glulam strength classes the<br />

minimum requirements for the laminations and the finger-joints, as given<br />

in Table 8, may be used.<br />

Table 8: Requirements to comply with some glulam strength classes<br />

Glulam strength class LH 25 LH 30 LH 35 LH 40<br />

Strength class <strong>of</strong> the laminations C 18 C 24 C 30 C 37<br />

Requirements due to finger joints:<br />

ρ ><br />

MOE ><br />

<strong>CIB</strong>-<strong>W18</strong> <strong>Timber</strong> <strong>Structures</strong> <strong>–</strong> A <strong>review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>meeting</strong> 1-<strong>43</strong> 2 <strong>MATERIAL</strong> PROPERTIES page 2.35<br />

none<br />

none<br />

390<br />

9000<br />

440<br />

12000<br />

ρ = mean density in kg/m 3 (moisture content u = 12%). MOE = mean<br />

lengthwise MOE in N/mm 2<br />

510<br />

15000

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!