11.02.2013 Views

CIB-W18 Timber Structures – A review of meeting 1-43 2 MATERIAL ...

CIB-W18 Timber Structures – A review of meeting 1-43 2 MATERIAL ...

CIB-W18 Timber Structures – A review of meeting 1-43 2 MATERIAL ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

to draw an approximate value for same from a graph (diagram). The residual<br />

load-bearing capacity <strong>of</strong> existing, structures or components can be<br />

checked and verified by means <strong>of</strong> the timber cross sections reduced by d.<br />

In the draft <strong>of</strong> the new GDR Code "<strong>Timber</strong> Construction - Loadbearing<br />

Systems" adopting the method <strong>of</strong> limit states, for timber the most<br />

significant agents have been assigned to ranges (grades) <strong>of</strong> aggressivity,<br />

and stress degrees have been defined accordingly. Subject to the stress degree<br />

and to the cross-sectional dimension <strong>of</strong> the timber component concerned,<br />

adaptation factors for the influence <strong>of</strong> aggressive media have been<br />

fixed.<br />

29-11-1 P Galimard, P Morlier<br />

Load duration effect on structural beams under varying climate influence<br />

<strong>of</strong> size and shape<br />

Abstract<br />

The Duration <strong>of</strong> Load effect has been <strong>of</strong> increasing interest for both the<br />

understanding <strong>of</strong> wood or wood products in long term behaviour and for<br />

the determination <strong>of</strong> safety factors for engineering purposes. Many kinds<br />

<strong>of</strong> testing, mainly in bending, have been made but the large amount <strong>of</strong><br />

configurations has always been reduced to few moisture contents and load<br />

histories. However, it is still not easy to compare all the results for the protocol<br />

<strong>of</strong> testing and presenting the results is not yet a standard.<br />

Different attempts <strong>of</strong> evaluating the stress level have been done and<br />

their accuracy depends on what is wanted to be shown. The methods are<br />

applied on 2 meter LVL beams subjected to bending in natural environment.<br />

Forty beams are stepwise loaded in an open shed in the Laboratoire<br />

de Rhéologie du Bois de Bordeaux in order to have a failure <strong>of</strong> 80% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

beams within two months. The step levels are from 50% to 90% <strong>of</strong> the average<br />

short term strength. Two beam depths (100 & 150 mm) are tested.<br />

The beams can be sealed or unsealed. The curvature, the time-to-failure<br />

and the climatic conditions are monitored.<br />

A ranking method is used to show the main trends <strong>of</strong> the duration <strong>of</strong><br />

load results: the time-to-failure are not affected by daily or short time variations<br />

<strong>of</strong> hygrothermal conditions, but by the two month mean variation <strong>of</strong><br />

the moisture content.<br />

The long term strength reductions are evaluated and finally compared<br />

to standard (EC5) ones. This work is a part <strong>of</strong> a European AIR-Project<br />

which has been set up to get experimental data on DOL <strong>of</strong> LVL and glulam<br />

straight, notched and curved sized beams.<br />

Conclusion<br />

<strong>–</strong> We have shown, on straight LVL beams that opposite conclusions can<br />

appear from the same data depending on the way <strong>of</strong> presenting the results.<br />

<strong>–</strong> However, the influence <strong>of</strong> the general changing <strong>of</strong> the climate was<br />

more important than the absolute moisture content.<br />

<strong>–</strong> The strength reduction estimation has roughly given the same results<br />

from the two tested methods; so #50% beams can be accurately used.<br />

<strong>–</strong> The short term strength has been influencing the results in a large scale,<br />

because <strong>of</strong> the moisture content reference and <strong>of</strong> the definition <strong>of</strong> the<br />

stress level.<br />

<strong>–</strong> The duration <strong>of</strong> load effect is fairly depending on the tested shape: it is<br />

more important on straight beams than on notched beams.<br />

<strong>–</strong> The EC5 krnod factor, for LVL beams, seems to be optimistic for EC5<br />

Service Class 2 and conservative for EC5 Service Class 3.<br />

A protocol <strong>of</strong> Duration <strong>of</strong> Load test and analysis is still needed because <strong>of</strong><br />

the numerous testing configurations, the variability <strong>of</strong> the result analysis,<br />

and the influence <strong>of</strong> the analysis on the conclusions that can be contradictory.<br />

30-11-1 R H Leicester, C H Wang, M N Nguyen, G C Foliente<br />

Probabilistic design models for the durability <strong>of</strong> timber constructions<br />

Introduction<br />

The theory <strong>of</strong> structural engineering for timber construction is now sufficiently<br />

well defined that computational design procedures can be developed<br />

and even codified. By contrast, design for durability is still very<br />

much <strong>of</strong> an art, with design solutions varying from person to person. More<br />

usually, design for durability is omitted and the control <strong>of</strong> performance is<br />

undertaken by complying with 'good building practice'.<br />

The key to developing a design procedure is first to have predictive<br />

models for durability. Because <strong>of</strong> the uncertainties associated with these<br />

models, they will <strong>of</strong> necessity have to be probabilistic models. Once such<br />

models are available computational design procedures can be developed<br />

<strong>CIB</strong>-<strong>W18</strong> <strong>Timber</strong> <strong>Structures</strong> <strong>–</strong> A <strong>review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>meeting</strong> 1-<strong>43</strong> 2 <strong>MATERIAL</strong> PROPERTIES page 2.24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!