11.02.2013 Views

CIB-W18 Timber Structures – A review of meeting 1-43 2 MATERIAL ...

CIB-W18 Timber Structures – A review of meeting 1-43 2 MATERIAL ...

CIB-W18 Timber Structures – A review of meeting 1-43 2 MATERIAL ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2.3 ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS<br />

20-18-1 A Mårtensson, S Thelandersson<br />

Wood materials under combined mechanical and hygral loading<br />

Introduction<br />

The influence <strong>of</strong> environment on the performance <strong>of</strong> wood or wood based<br />

materials is significant in many applications. The mechanical properties <strong>of</strong><br />

wooden materials depend on moisture content and dimensional changes<br />

induced by moisture variation <strong>of</strong>ten lead to displacements which are greater<br />

than those caused by mechanical loading. Moreover, interaction <strong>of</strong><br />

moisture changes with mechanical loading can lead to excessive deformation<br />

<strong>of</strong> wooden structures.<br />

In composite structures like stressed skin panels, composite beams and<br />

layered wooden products, differential swelling or shrinkage produces internal<br />

stresses, which can cause degradation as well as distortion <strong>of</strong> shape.<br />

Such effects may accumulate as a result <strong>of</strong> repeated moisture cycling during<br />

the lifetime <strong>of</strong> the structure, and may contribute significantly to reduce<br />

its durability.<br />

In codes for wooden structures, e. g. Eurocode 5, design values <strong>of</strong><br />

strength and stiffness parameters are made dependent on moisture class<br />

and load-duration class. This means that the effect <strong>of</strong> moisture conditions<br />

on basic material properties during the lifetime <strong>of</strong> the structure is considered<br />

in a simple way suitable for practical design. Due to the complexity<br />

<strong>of</strong> the underlying physical problems, however, a rational basis for description<br />

and quantification <strong>of</strong> these effects is still lacking. Clearly, there is a<br />

need for further research in this area, in order to establish a more reliable<br />

knowledge base for code specifications.<br />

In addition, environmental effects should enter structural design not only<br />

on the "capacity" side, but also on the "loading" side. Moisture and<br />

temperature induced deformations are referred to as indirect actions to be<br />

considered along with and in combination with other types <strong>of</strong> loading. It is<br />

not quite evident, though, how such actions should be considered in the<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> wood structures. For instance, if stresses due to restrained<br />

shrinkage or swelling are calculated by normal engineering methods, unrealistically<br />

high values are usually obtained.<br />

Consider, as a simple example, a wooden element which is drying with<br />

the shrinkage fully restrained, Fig. 1. According to linear theory <strong>of</strong> elasticity,<br />

the stress change ��i due to restrained shrinkage is given by<br />

�� � E�<br />

�<br />

(1)<br />

i s<br />

where E is the modulus <strong>of</strong> elasticity and �� s is the shrinkage strain that<br />

would occur if the element were free to shrink.<br />

Fig. 1. Drying wood element under full restraint.<br />

Using representative values for �� s in moisture class 1 and design values<br />

for E it is found that ��i calculated from Eq (1) may be as high as 50% <strong>of</strong><br />

the design value <strong>of</strong> the tensile strength for wood (parallel to the grain) and<br />

wood based products. It should be noted that the design value <strong>of</strong> E is specified<br />

in codes under the assumption that a low value <strong>of</strong> E is unfavourable.<br />

When E is used to calculate restraint stresses the opposite is valid, implying<br />

that a consistent choice <strong>of</strong> design parameters would give still higher<br />

values <strong>of</strong> � �i<br />

.<br />

Stresses due to imposed deformations may be neglected when they contribute<br />

to 'ductile' types <strong>of</strong> failure as for wood in compression. But for<br />

'brittle' types <strong>of</strong> failure as for wood or adhesive joints in tension and shear,<br />

such stresses can be expected to contribute significantly. Accordingly, it is<br />

<strong>of</strong> importance in many situations to be able to predict stresses induced by<br />

moisture variations in an accurate way. A main purpose with the present<br />

paper is to contribute to the solution <strong>of</strong> this problem.<br />

Concluding remarks<br />

The following main conclusions can be drawn from the present investigation:<br />

1) Tests on hardboard show that the effect <strong>of</strong> moisture variations on tensile<br />

creep is surprisingly small, in view <strong>of</strong> the very significant mecanosorptive<br />

effects observed for other wooden materials.<br />

<strong>CIB</strong>-<strong>W18</strong> <strong>Timber</strong> <strong>Structures</strong> <strong>–</strong> A <strong>review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>meeting</strong> 1-<strong>43</strong> 2 <strong>MATERIAL</strong> PROPERTIES page 2.22

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!