11.02.2013 Views

CIB-W18 Timber Structures – A review of meeting 1-43 2 MATERIAL ...

CIB-W18 Timber Structures – A review of meeting 1-43 2 MATERIAL ...

CIB-W18 Timber Structures – A review of meeting 1-43 2 MATERIAL ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>–</strong> WF/Ww: 2:1<br />

The single span three point bending test configuration with rectangular<br />

cross-section and reinforced chord represents possibly an alternative to the<br />

I-cross-section. Mainly there doesn't rise any problem <strong>of</strong> compression perpendicular<br />

to grain between bottom chord and web. The problem <strong>of</strong> compression<br />

perpendicular to the grain in the range <strong>of</strong> the loading can be<br />

solved by lengthening the loading plate. More information has to be gathered,<br />

however, on how the mechanical properties <strong>of</strong> the material us to reinforce<br />

the flanges influence the strength values which had been quite various<br />

at the tests<br />

35-21-1 B Yeh, T G Williamson<br />

Full-scale edgewise shear tests for laminated veneer lumber<br />

Abstract<br />

The shear strength <strong>of</strong> laminated veneer lumber (LVL) has traditionally<br />

been determined based on the results <strong>of</strong> small block shear tests conducted<br />

in accordance with ASTM D 1<strong>43</strong>. In recent years, there has been a significant<br />

interest in determining the shear strength <strong>of</strong> engineered wood products<br />

using full-scale bending test methods in lieu <strong>of</strong> small block shear<br />

tests. However, due primarily to different shear-to-bending strength ratios<br />

among a variety <strong>of</strong> engineered wood products, the use <strong>of</strong> a prismatic cross<br />

section and test setup similar to those adopted for full-scale shear tests <strong>of</strong><br />

glulam does not normally produce an acceptable shear failure rate in the<br />

edgewise or joist orientation (loads are applied parallel to gluelines), as required<br />

for LVL. Therefore, special considerations should be given to the<br />

test setup and specimen configuration for LVL edgewise shear tests.<br />

Conclusions<br />

The following conclusions can be substantiated by the test results presented<br />

above:<br />

<strong>–</strong> The full-scale test method used in this study is adequate for qualification<br />

<strong>of</strong> the edgewise shear strength <strong>of</strong> LVL.<br />

<strong>–</strong> The difference in the characteristic shear stresses between the specimens<br />

tested at the standard environmental conditions (9.0% moisture<br />

content in this study) and as-received conditions (6.8% moisture content<br />

in this study) are negligible.<br />

<strong>–</strong> The mean shear strength derived from the ASTM D 1<strong>43</strong> small block<br />

shear tests is approximately 50% higher than the mean shear strength<br />

determined from full-scale shear tests, suggesting the necessity <strong>of</strong> considering<br />

a size effect.<br />

<strong>–</strong> The small-scale QA specimen configuration and test setup used in this<br />

study can be used for edgewise QA shear tests.<br />

38-6-3 H Klapp, H Brüningh<strong>of</strong>f<br />

Shear strength <strong>of</strong> glued laminated timber<br />

Introduction<br />

The current knowledge in timber research gives no applicable computation<br />

method for the shear bearing capacity <strong>of</strong> glued laminated timber beams.<br />

The dependence <strong>of</strong> the shear strength <strong>of</strong> the lamination tensile strength, set<br />

in EN 1194, could not be confirmed by the tests <strong>of</strong> Schickh<strong>of</strong>er in Graz, so<br />

that in the new German standard DIN 1052 instead a constant value <strong>of</strong> 3,5<br />

N/mm 2 was set. This value was determined from the test results computationally<br />

as five percent quantile, whereby it is to be stated that about 10<br />

percent <strong>of</strong> all test results fell below the strength <strong>of</strong> 3,5 N/mm 2 . In the context<br />

<strong>of</strong> statistics, this doesn't seem to be alarming. But a negative influence<br />

<strong>of</strong> the volume on the shear bearing capacity is to be assumed as in the case<br />

<strong>of</strong> the likewise brittle transverse tension failure. The tests mentioned were<br />

conducted on comparatively small beams, so that lower shear strengths for<br />

dimensions <strong>of</strong> practical use can be supposed.<br />

In view <strong>of</strong> this uncertainty concerning the shear strengths as well as the<br />

current cases <strong>of</strong> damage, there is an urgent need for further research. However<br />

larger test series with practical dimensions are costly in terms <strong>of</strong> resources<br />

and labour. For this reason the alternative solution <strong>of</strong> a simulation<br />

model, which considers the varying material properties, was selected.<br />

Simulation model<br />

The simulation model is based on the assumption that the shear strength <strong>of</strong><br />

glued laminated timber depends on the properties <strong>of</strong> the laminations. In<br />

contrast to EN 1194 a dependence not on the tensile strength is supposed,<br />

but on shear strength. Furthermore brittle fracture behaviour is applied by<br />

assuming failure as soon as the shear strength <strong>of</strong> the lamination is reached.<br />

According to this the shear strength <strong>of</strong> a glulam beam can be easily determined<br />

by comparing the shear stresses <strong>of</strong> the laminations with the corre-<br />

<strong>CIB</strong>-<strong>W18</strong> <strong>Timber</strong> <strong>Structures</strong> <strong>–</strong> A <strong>review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>meeting</strong> 1-<strong>43</strong> 2 <strong>MATERIAL</strong> PROPERTIES page 2.115

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!