11.02.2013 Views

CIB-W18 Timber Structures – A review of meeting 1-43 2 MATERIAL ...

CIB-W18 Timber Structures – A review of meeting 1-43 2 MATERIAL ...

CIB-W18 Timber Structures – A review of meeting 1-43 2 MATERIAL ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

y assuming a normal distribution. EN 1<strong>43</strong>58 follows basically the same<br />

approach as ISO 12491, but assuming a log-normal distribution and an unknown<br />

coefficient <strong>of</strong> variation.<br />

The investigations show that EN 1<strong>43</strong>58 and EN 384 give the same results.<br />

If only one European standard is maintained, one suggests that EN<br />

1<strong>43</strong>58 is kept, since it is applicable to all wood-based products and that it<br />

is much easier to i use. We should only slightly modify it in order to have<br />

a minimum sampling (e.g. 200 specimens, made <strong>of</strong> 5 distinct samples).<br />

Despite ISO 12491 is applicable to all building materials, we suggest<br />

not to use it, since it gives a big scatter.<br />

In ISO 13910, there is an equivalence factor with EN 384, which varies<br />

from 1,0 to 1,3, depending on the strength property, the size and the quality<br />

<strong>of</strong> timber, taking into account different test methods. Our simulations<br />

show that the way <strong>of</strong> calculating the fifth percentiles gives another correction<br />

factor, which encounters the previous one. By combining both factors,<br />

we could use a straightforward correspondence between both standards.<br />

Conclusions<br />

The investigations show that EN 1<strong>43</strong>58 and EN 384 give the same results.<br />

If only one European standard is maintained, one suggests that EN 1<strong>43</strong>58<br />

is kept, since it is applicable to all wood-based products and that it is much<br />

easier to use. We should only slightly modify it in order to have a minimum<br />

sampling (e.g. 200 specimens, made <strong>of</strong> 5 distinct samples).<br />

Despite ISO 12491 is applicable to all building materials, we suggest<br />

not to use it, since it gives a big scatter.<br />

In ISO 13910, there is an equivalence factor with EN 384, which varies<br />

from 1,0 to 1,3, depending on the strength property, the size and the quality<br />

<strong>of</strong> timber, taking into account different test methods. Our simulations<br />

show that the way <strong>of</strong> calculating the fifth percentiles gives another correction<br />

factor, which encounters the previous one. By combining both factors,<br />

we could use a straightforward correspondence between both standards.<br />

<strong>CIB</strong>-<strong>W18</strong> <strong>Timber</strong> <strong>Structures</strong> <strong>–</strong> A <strong>review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>meeting</strong> 1-<strong>43</strong> 2 <strong>MATERIAL</strong> PROPERTIES page 2.111

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!