11.02.2013 Views

CIB-W18 Timber Structures – A review of meeting 1-43 2 MATERIAL ...

CIB-W18 Timber Structures – A review of meeting 1-43 2 MATERIAL ...

CIB-W18 Timber Structures – A review of meeting 1-43 2 MATERIAL ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

strength tends to increase with rising timber quality and decreasing dimensions.<br />

Regarding the safety (for low timber quality) and the economy (for<br />

high timber quality) <strong>of</strong> timber structures it would be desirable to take these<br />

effects into consideration when determining characteristic strength values.<br />

Discussion and conclusions<br />

The present investigations involving structural timber from Central Europe<br />

(mainly spruce) confirm that the ratio between tensile and bending<br />

strength depends on timber quality. This relationship can be derived using<br />

brittle fracture theory and expressed in terms <strong>of</strong> dependence on bending<br />

strength.<br />

According to the brittle fracture theory there is a constant relationship ft/fm<br />

which is independent <strong>of</strong> timber quality and dimensions. When taking into<br />

account the different material behaviour <strong>of</strong> timber loaded in tension and in<br />

bending by calculating different parameters for the strength distributions,<br />

the ratio <strong>of</strong> ft/fm increases with strength and can be said to be more realistic.<br />

For 2,642 tension and 1,739 bending tests in 28 and 27 samples respectively<br />

using test specimens in structural dimensions (constant dimensions<br />

per sample) ungraded timber resulted in the relationship<br />

1,20<br />

t � 0,36 m<br />

f f<br />

The bending tests were conducted with the weakest section located in the<br />

tension zone, so that a relationship in conformity with EN 384 based on<br />

bending tests involving random location <strong>of</strong> weak sections shows lower ratios.<br />

With consideration <strong>of</strong> test conditions involving non-random positioning<br />

<strong>of</strong> weak sections the 5 percentiles <strong>of</strong> tension strength were related to the<br />

7.5 percentiles <strong>of</strong> the bending strength. For strength graded timber there is<br />

a noticeable effect <strong>of</strong> both grading method and dimensions on the ft/fm ratio.<br />

There is no clear effect <strong>of</strong> timber quality on the ratio ft/fm in timber<br />

visually graded according to DIN 4074, while increase in ratio is remarkable<br />

for machine graded timber.<br />

No size effect was found for ungraded timber. A more pronounced size<br />

effect in strength graded timber loaded in tension lead to a size effect, on<br />

average, <strong>of</strong><br />

�lmrbmr� �<br />

l b<br />

�<br />

� m m�<br />

for visually graded specimens tested according to EN 408. Due to a constant<br />

ratio <strong>of</strong> b/l the effects <strong>of</strong> test length or span and specimen width or<br />

height could not be determined separately. There is considerable scattering<br />

regarding the ratio ft/fm. For safety reasons the lower ratios were more<br />

strongly weighted when determining the relationship for characteristic<br />

strength values ft,k/fm,k. In conjunction with the test data on visually and<br />

machine graded timber from literature the following equation was derived:<br />

1,28<br />

tk , 0,26 mk ,<br />

f � f<br />

(14)<br />

Table 4 compares characteristic tensile strength values for strength classes<br />

according to EN 338 derived from this equation with currently valid<br />

strength values. This reveals that tensile strength is being overrated as regards<br />

the lower strength classes while in the higher strength classes tension<br />

strength is being given too conservative. For economy and safety reasons<br />

proper consideration <strong>of</strong> the influence <strong>of</strong> timber quality would therefore<br />

be desirable, which would adequately highlight the particular advantages<br />

<strong>of</strong> machine graded timber.<br />

Tab. 4.- Comparison <strong>of</strong> characteristic strength values for strength classes<br />

according to EN 338 for load in bending and in tension with tension<br />

strength values calculated acc. to eq. (14).<br />

[N/mm 2 ] C 14 C 16 C 18 C 22 C 24 C 27 C 30 C35 C 40<br />

fm,k 14 16 18 22 24 27 30 35 40<br />

ft,k 8 10 11 13 14 16 18 21 24<br />

ft (14) 7.0 8.3 9.7 12.5 14.0 16.3 18.7 22.7 27.0<br />

36-6-1 P Glos, J Denzler<br />

Characteristic shear strength values based on tests according to EN<br />

1193<br />

Introduction<br />

Until today the effect <strong>of</strong> wood properties on shear strength <strong>of</strong> s<strong>of</strong>twood is<br />

not completely understood. The European standard EN 384 assumes a direct<br />

relationship between shear and bending strength: fv,k = 0,2∙(fm,k ) 0,8 .<br />

The strength properties proposed for the strength classes according to<br />

EN 338 are based on the same relationship. This means that the characteristic<br />

shear strength values are increasing with higher strength classes i.e.<br />

with increasing bending strength and density.<br />

<strong>CIB</strong>-<strong>W18</strong> <strong>Timber</strong> <strong>Structures</strong> <strong>–</strong> A <strong>review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>meeting</strong> 1-<strong>43</strong> 2 <strong>MATERIAL</strong> PROPERTIES page 2.109

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!