11.02.2013 Views

Abstracts with Programs - Geological Society of America

Abstracts with Programs - Geological Society of America

Abstracts with Programs - Geological Society of America

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3-5 14:00 Furlong, Kevin P.<br />

THE CANTERBURY, NEW ZEALAND EARTHQUAKE SEQUENCE: LESSONS FROM A YEAR<br />

OF EARTHQUAKES<br />

FURLONG, Kevin P., Geosciences, Penn State Univ, 542 Deike Building, University Park,<br />

PA 16802, kevin@geodyn.psu.edu<br />

In the year since the September 2010 earthquake in Canterbury, the lives <strong>of</strong> New Zealanders<br />

have been changed forever. The main sequence <strong>of</strong> earthquakes led after almost 6 months to<br />

the deadly and damaging Christchurch Earthquake <strong>of</strong> February 22, 2011 (23:51, 21/02/11<br />

UTC); a critically important event, but only one part <strong>of</strong> the Canterbury earthquake sequence<br />

started by the Mw 7.1 Darfield Earthquake in September <strong>of</strong> 2010. These earthquakes<br />

have occurred on previously unrecognized fault(s) and significantly distant from the main<br />

components <strong>of</strong> the plate boundary system through South Island, New Zealand. The initial<br />

rupture pattern <strong>of</strong> the September event and subsequent aftershocks have delineated a<br />

linear (nearly east-west in orientation) trend <strong>of</strong> seismicity extending from the foothills <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Southern Alps to the Pacific coast to the east <strong>of</strong> the city <strong>of</strong> Christchurch. Understanding the<br />

relationships among the various fault segments, the regional geologic structure, and crustal<br />

stresses associated <strong>with</strong> regional plate interactions (further modified by the earthquakes) is key<br />

to placing these events into a context allowing their lessons to be applied elsewhere. Here we<br />

focus on the seismo-tectonics <strong>of</strong> the sequence in the year following the initial event to address<br />

the following: 1) How does the February 22 event’s fault relate to the September 3 fault system<br />

both physically and through stress conditions; 2) Where do the other larger aftershocks fit into<br />

the overall sequence; 3) Are there gaps in moment release between main rupture segments<br />

and what role have aftershocks played in modifying any gaps; 4) Are there other faults capable<br />

<strong>of</strong> hosting moderate but damaging earthquakes in the region and have the year <strong>of</strong> aftershocks<br />

identified these faults; and 5) Can we say anything about the potential for future events such as<br />

the February 22 earthquake; both nearby to Christchurch and regionally? This last point is the<br />

fundamental question that Christchurch residents would like answered and is diagnostic <strong>of</strong> the<br />

issues that mark the global significance <strong>of</strong> this and similar events.<br />

3-6 14:20 Rubin, Jeffrey N.<br />

HAZARD COMMUNICATION REQUIRES KNOWING “WHO” AS WELL AS “HOW”<br />

RUBIN, Jeffrey N., Tualatin Valley Fire & Rescue, 20665 SW Blanton St, Aloha, OR 97007,<br />

jeff.rubin@tvfr.com<br />

Geoscientists have an essential role in communicating natural hazard risk to the public, in<br />

order to generate timely, effective action. As <strong>with</strong> the internet use over the past ~ 15 years,<br />

excessive focus on the medium may be at the cost <strong>of</strong> the message itself and who receives it.<br />

Informing the public requires replacing largely tacit assumptions <strong>with</strong> active questions. Who is<br />

“the public” and what communities do we need to engage? Who are the best spokespeople<br />

to address those communities and what are the most appropriate media? Are we speaking<br />

to entire communities or to a subset (e.g., decision-makers)? What hazard are we trying<br />

to address and what is the desired outcome? With what daily priorities are we competing?<br />

Increasing knowledge and/or awareness (e.g., a specific telephone number), promoting an<br />

emergency action (e.g., immediate protective measures in an earthquake), and promoting preincident<br />

action (e.g., seismic mitigation) require different approaches and expertise. Audience<br />

classification is complex but may include age, sex, location, economic status, language(s),<br />

and hazard-specific vulnerabilities. Individuals tend to personalize risk, and actual hazard<br />

perception (and thus willingness to act) may diverge from expert assessment. Knowledge<br />

transfer may be an important outcome, but knowledge <strong>with</strong>out direction toward action may<br />

result in a smarter – but not safer – public.<br />

3-7 14:40 Okal, Emile<br />

ELEVEN TSUNAMIS FROM SUMATRA TO TOHOKU: HAVE WE BECOME WISER?<br />

OKAL, Emile, Department <strong>of</strong> Earth & Planetary Sciences, Northwestern University,<br />

Evanston, IL 60208, emile@earth.northwestern.edu<br />

The 2004 Sumatra earthquake was the biggest earthquake in at least 40 years, and its tsunami<br />

probably the deadliest in the history <strong>of</strong> mankind. Six years later, we examine its impact on our<br />

knowledge <strong>of</strong> Earth dynamics, on our approach to tsunami mitigation and warning and we<br />

review critically the performance and efficiency <strong>of</strong> warnings during the smaller tsunamis which<br />

have occurred since 2005. While awareness <strong>of</strong> tsunami hazard has undoubtedly been raised<br />

worldwide, and substantial funding appropriated, the development <strong>of</strong> tsunami centers and the<br />

improvement <strong>of</strong> warning algorithms remains occasionally chaotic, despite significant analytical<br />

progress, such as the generalization <strong>of</strong> W-phase inversions.<br />

We review eleven post-Sumatra tsunamis (from Nias, 2005 to Tohoku, 2011) and assign<br />

them a color-coded wisdom index, on a scale from red (bad) to gold (excellent), depending<br />

on an [admittedly subjective] evaluation <strong>of</strong> the performance <strong>of</strong> the warning centers and <strong>of</strong> the<br />

response <strong>of</strong> the populations involved. The results are mixed, <strong>with</strong> a generally positive attitude <strong>of</strong><br />

coastal inhabitants possessing the reflex <strong>of</strong> self-evacuation, but a frequent failure <strong>of</strong> centralized<br />

warning centers and government agencies, which in particular, have repeatedly failed to<br />

mitigate against, and recognize in real time, the so-called “tsunami earthquakes” characterized<br />

by slow rupture and enhanced tsunami generation.<br />

3-8 15:30 Lauterjung, Joern<br />

TSUNAMI EARLY WARNING FOR THE INDIAN OCEAN - LESSONS LEARNED<br />

LAUTERJUNG, Joern, GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Telegrafenberg,<br />

Haus A40, Potsdam 14473 Germany, lau@gfz-potsdam.de<br />

Indonesia is located along the most prominent active continental margin in the Indian Ocean,<br />

the so-called Sunda Arc and, therefore, is one <strong>of</strong> the most threatened regions <strong>of</strong> the world in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> natural hazards such as earthquakes, volcanoes, and tsunamis. On 26 December<br />

2004 the third largest earthquake ever instrumentally recorded (magnitude 9.3) occurred<br />

<strong>of</strong>f-shore northern Sumatra and triggered a mega-tsunami affecting the whole Indian Ocean.<br />

Almost a quarter <strong>of</strong> a million people were killed, as the region was not prepared either in terms<br />

<strong>of</strong> early-warning or in terms <strong>of</strong> disaster response.<br />

In order to be able to provide, in future, a fast and reliable warning procedure for the<br />

population, Germany, immediately after the catastrophe, <strong>of</strong>fered during the UN World<br />

Conference on Disaster Reduction in Kobe, Hyogo/Japan in January 2005 technical support<br />

for the development and installation <strong>of</strong> a tsunami early warning system for the Indian Ocean<br />

in addition to assistance in capacity development in particular for local communities. This<br />

<strong>of</strong>fer was accepted by Indonesia but also by other countries like Sri Lanka, the Maldives and<br />

some East-African countries. Anyhow the main focus <strong>of</strong> the activities has been carried out<br />

in Indonesia as the main source <strong>of</strong> tsunami threat for the entire Indian Ocean. Challenging<br />

for the technical concept <strong>of</strong> this warning system are the extremely short warning times<br />

for Indonesia, due to its vicinity to the Sunda Arc. For this reason the German Indonesian<br />

Tsunami Early Warning System (GITEWS) integrates different modern and new scientific<br />

monitoring technologies, analysis methods and modelling approaches for tsunami propagation,<br />

inundation and risk assessment. Core <strong>of</strong> the system is a state <strong>of</strong> the art decision support<br />

system. Furthermore respective strategies and tools for disaster mitigation, preparedness and<br />

evacuation for local communities have been implemented.<br />

SESSION NO. 4<br />

3-9 15:50 Blewitt, Ge<strong>of</strong>frey<br />

A PROTOTYPE SYSTEM FOR TSUNAMI EARLY WARNING BASED ON REAL-TIME GPS<br />

BLEWITT, Ge<strong>of</strong>frey1 , BAR-SEVER, Yoaz2 , GROSS, Richard2 , HAMMOND,<br />

William Charles1 , HUDNUT, Kenneth W. 3 , KHACHIKYAN, Robert2 , PLAG, Hans-Peter1 ,<br />

SONG, Y. Tony 2 , WEBB, Frank H. 2 , and SIMONS, Mark4 , (1) Nevada Bureau <strong>of</strong> Mines and<br />

Geology and Nevada Seismological Laboratory, University <strong>of</strong> Nevada, Reno, Reno, NV<br />

89557, gblewitt@unr.edu, (2) Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology,<br />

Pasadena, CA 91109, (3) U. S. <strong>Geological</strong> Survey, 525 S. Wilson Ave, Pasadena, CA<br />

91106, (4) Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Geological</strong> and Planetary Sciences, California Institute <strong>of</strong><br />

Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125<br />

Reliable tsunami early warning requires a rapid assessment <strong>of</strong> the tsunamigenic potential <strong>of</strong> an<br />

earthquake as well as a prediction <strong>of</strong> the likely propagation pattern <strong>of</strong> the tsunami. Low-latency<br />

availability <strong>of</strong> the coseismic Earth’s surface displacements can support the assessment <strong>of</strong> the<br />

tsunamigenic potential <strong>of</strong> an earthquake and improve predictions <strong>of</strong> the propagation pattern <strong>of</strong><br />

the tsunami.<br />

Here we present the GREAT Alert, which is a NASA-sponsored, real-time prototype<br />

system designed to enhance tsunami warning capability. The system takes advantage <strong>of</strong> the<br />

increasingly available global and regional real-time GPS data, as well as advanced fault and<br />

ocean dynamics models to enable more accurate and timely assessment <strong>of</strong> the magnitude and<br />

mechanism <strong>of</strong> large earthquakes, and the magnitude and direction <strong>of</strong> resulting tsunamis. We<br />

will describe the prototype operational system being developed in a multi-agency collaboration.<br />

The key system components are:<br />

(1) the operational real-time estimation <strong>of</strong> site coordinates from hundreds <strong>of</strong> GPS sites using<br />

a precise point positioning algorithm;<br />

(2) the application <strong>of</strong> data filtering and quality control techniques to the real-time site position<br />

time series in order to enhance the accurate retrieval <strong>of</strong> co-seismic site motions;<br />

(3) usage <strong>of</strong> either an empirical inversion model or a “fingerprint” model, which maps slip<br />

on a fault segment to surface displacement, for the rapid determination <strong>of</strong> the earthquake<br />

displacement field from the GPS-based records at each station;<br />

(4) the input <strong>of</strong> detected and modeled seafloor displacements into a special ocean dynamics<br />

model to determine tsunami source energy and scales, and estimate the tsunami propagation;<br />

(5) the dissemination <strong>of</strong> the results to the responsible agencies to help in their decision<br />

making processes.<br />

We will discuss the actual and predicted performance <strong>of</strong> the system, particularly in light <strong>of</strong><br />

recent great earthquakes around the globe, and in view <strong>of</strong> the rapid development <strong>of</strong> real time<br />

GPS stations being used to monitor the Cascadia subduction zone near the Pacific coast <strong>of</strong> the<br />

United States.<br />

3-10 16:10 Miller, Meghan<br />

GEODYNAMIC INTERACTIONS BETWEEN THE LITHOSPHERE, CRYOSPHERE,<br />

ATMOSPHERE AND HYDROSPHERE, AS REVEALED BY MODERN SPACE GEODESY<br />

MILLER, Meghan, UNAVCO, 6350 Nautilus Drive, Boulder, CO 80301, meghan@<br />

unavco.org<br />

Transformational scientific discoveries stem from the recent growth <strong>of</strong> integrated geophysical<br />

observatories and networks that are operated by facilities on behalf <strong>of</strong> US university consortia.<br />

UNAVCO is one such consortium, facilitating geoscience research and education using<br />

geodesy. The technology revolution yields increasingly sophisticated and precise geodetic<br />

techniques.<br />

Individually and through partnerships such as <strong>with</strong> those EarthScope and JPL, UNAVCO<br />

operates geodetic networks around the world <strong>with</strong> core sponsorship from NSF and NASA.<br />

The geodetic component <strong>of</strong> EarthScope, the Plate Boundary Observatory (PBO), is an<br />

integrated network <strong>of</strong> complementary geodetic techniques that sample at seconds (GPS and<br />

strain meters) to millennia (geodetic imaging). Other integrated, open geodetic data sets are<br />

emerging from around the world: Greenland, Antarctica, Latin <strong>America</strong>, and Africa.<br />

The international research community actively mines and integrates open archives and data<br />

sets to support new applications and discoveries, advancing understanding <strong>of</strong> the complex<br />

interactions that drive geodynamics. Ocean loading effects detected by GPS constrains<br />

refinements to mantle structure and rheology on the US Pacific seaboard, integration <strong>of</strong><br />

GPS and accelerometer records yield full displacement seismograms, atmospheric pressure<br />

correlates to near-fault deformation in Taiwan, ocean and solid Earth tides modulate slow<br />

slip events in Cascadia, the Tohoku tsunami <strong>of</strong> 2011 registered on strain meters across the<br />

Pacific, combinations <strong>of</strong> GPS and InSAR provide deeper insights into earthquake and volcano<br />

deformation than previously possible, annual and inter-annual structure in the GPS time<br />

series can now be strongly correlated to ground deformation related to changes in snow load,<br />

aquifers, and surface water reservoirs.<br />

This synthesis <strong>of</strong> recent community science contributions reveals the influence <strong>of</strong> the<br />

atmosphere, hydrosphere, and tides in modulating tectonic and glacial processes that are<br />

fundamental to understanding natural hazards.<br />

SESSION NO. 4, 11:00<br />

Monday, 5 September 2011<br />

T7A. Earth Surface in the Anthropocene<br />

Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, A 016<br />

4-1 11:00 Friedrich, Jana<br />

DATING OF COASTAL MARINE SEDIMENTS: 210PB AND 137CS IN DANUBE-INFLUENCED<br />

BLACK SEA SHELF SEDIMENTS<br />

FRIEDRICH, Jana, Marine Geochemistry, Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine<br />

Research, Am Handelshafen 12, Bremerhaven, 27570, Germany, jana.friedrich@<br />

awi.de, LAPTEV, Gennady, Center for Monitoring Studies and Environmental Technology,<br />

Ukrainian Scientific and Research Institute for Hydrometeorology, 37 Prospekt Nauki,<br />

Kiev, 03028, Ukraine, and LIEBETRAU, Volker, Marine Biogeochemistry, IFM-GEOMAR,<br />

Wischh<strong>of</strong>str. 1-3, Kiel, 24148, Germany<br />

Coastal marine sediments are natural archives <strong>of</strong> environmental change due to anthropogenic<br />

impact and natural variability in aquatic ecosystems, e.g. coastal erosion, changing river<br />

discharge, marine productivity and pollution. Dating <strong>of</strong> those sediments is a prerequisite for<br />

recovering records <strong>of</strong> change. The natural occurring radionuclide 210Pb and the artificial fallout<br />

radionuclides 137Cs and 241Am are applied in dating <strong>of</strong> recent sediments, i.e. deposited since the<br />

beginning <strong>of</strong> the industrial period. 137Cs serves as an independent time marker for end <strong>of</strong> the<br />

atmospheric bomb test fallout in 1963 and the Chernobyl accident in 1986. Due to its chemical<br />

mobility in sediments, the 137Cs signal is <strong>of</strong>ten weakened. Complementary, the less mobile<br />

241 241 241 Am may be used. Am originates from decay <strong>of</strong> the bomb fallout <strong>of</strong> Pu, and is used as a<br />

second time marker <strong>of</strong> the 1963 event.<br />

The northwestern shelf ecosystem <strong>of</strong> the Black Sea has been hit by eutrophication and<br />

pollution from the late 1960’s to the mid-1990’s, largely triggered by Danube River input <strong>of</strong><br />

Munich, Germany A5<br />

Monday

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!