11.02.2013 Views

Full document / COSOC-W-86-002 - the National Sea Grant Library

Full document / COSOC-W-86-002 - the National Sea Grant Library

Full document / COSOC-W-86-002 - the National Sea Grant Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

variables. This resulted in a set of month-by-month records for <strong>the</strong><br />

selected pollutants. We chose KGD as <strong>the</strong> standard unit for loadings and<br />

merged monthly pollutant records with monthly Flow records.<br />

A profile of point source pollution In Narragansett Bay<br />

For Narragansett Bay, AMS extracted data for 613 facilities in EPA<br />

Region I with PCS basin codes "0611." About 200 facilities 1n<br />

Massachusetts and Rhode Island had missing basin code values and <strong>the</strong>se<br />

facilities were consequently not Included In <strong>the</strong> working data subsets.<br />

Of <strong>the</strong> 613 facilities listed in PCS as discharging into Narragansett<br />

Bay, 123 have at least one corresponding Outfall record, 121 have at<br />

least one corresponding Limit record, and 103 have at least one<br />

corresponding Measurement record. Of <strong>the</strong> 3S4 total Outfall records, 340<br />

have a corresponding Limit record and 263 have a corresponding<br />

Measurement record. Of <strong>the</strong> 3,129 total Limit records, 1,926 have a<br />

corresponding Measurement record. In total, <strong>the</strong>re were 51,515<br />

measurement records that satisfied <strong>the</strong> criteria established for<br />

Inclusion Into <strong>the</strong> working data set.<br />

The analyses performed on <strong>the</strong>se data fall Into <strong>the</strong> following<br />

catagories:<br />

o Time series, based on monthly data from 1985 to present, help<br />

spot trends<br />

o Bar charts based on 1985 averages, rank sources and profile<br />

point sources of pollution in terns of pollutant type and<br />

facility<br />

o Bay Maps, based on 1985 averages, pinpoint facility locations<br />

and illustrate discharge levels in terms of circles related in<br />

size to KGO.<br />

Examples of <strong>the</strong>se analyses are provided in figures 6, 7, and 8.<br />

Conclusion<br />

The above examples show how Integrating estuarine and coastal zone<br />

information can Improve environmental deolon-making by providing<br />

pollutant profile results in an interactive framework that enables<br />

what-1f and sensitivity analyses. These results can be used to determine<br />

emission and risk Implications of alternative control options when<br />

comparing various pollutants and facilities. S1m1)ar1ly, <strong>the</strong>se analyses<br />

can assist In targeting <strong>the</strong> highest payoff control opportunities within<br />

a regulatory or standard setting context. One obvious application, for<br />

example, would be establishing an ambient monitoring station near <strong>the</strong><br />

Bethlehem Steel Plant to determine whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> high discharge levels of<br />

lead are detected in <strong>the</strong> water column of <strong>the</strong> Patapsco River. With this<br />

type of Information, <strong>the</strong> State of Maryland permit writers could better<br />

set parameter limits based on "real" Impact data. In <strong>the</strong> case of<br />

Narragansett Bay, <strong>the</strong> data base tools could be used to assist In<br />

targeting specific point sources of discharge to try and limit specific<br />

pollutant types (e.g. cadmium) or specific loading sources. These types<br />

449

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!