Full document / COSOC-W-86-002 - the National Sea Grant Library
Full document / COSOC-W-86-002 - the National Sea Grant Library Full document / COSOC-W-86-002 - the National Sea Grant Library
we entertain their suggestions for judicious use of the dredge material. Southwest Pass. We first started creating marsh with dredged material along Southwest Pass of the Hisslsslppi Elver. There we discovered that If we kept the initial height of the material below six feet, it would generally compact and settle into the Intertldal zone and marsh grasses would colonize it. Moving the dredge pipe more often would probably create more marsh. However, with our limited maintenance budget, this Is not possible. We have chosen an enclosed area on the South side of the pass and applied for money under Section 150 of the Water Resources and Development Act of 1976. We would use the money to keep the initial height at five feet and monitor this to see if more marsh is created. We are presently dealing with the leasors of the land to attempt to work out Institutional problens. Harsh Creation. Table 1 indicates the acres of marsh we have created by TABLE 1 ACRES OF MARSH CREATED Location Land Ownership Harsh Hud Flats !/ KR-GO jetties State 30 140 MR-GO inland Private 20 Tiger Pass State 230 Avoca Lake Private 600 Sweet Lake State 90 Sabine NWR Federal refuge 200 Atachafalaya Delta State mgmt area 60 300 V These will probably become marsh once we place dredged material on them again. carefully choosing disposal sites and moving the dredge pipe as often as practical. As can be seen, we have tried to build marsh on public lands as often as possible and have built it in state water bottoms in other cases. Occasionally ve have no choice but to place the material in 4to 6-foot deep open water. It takes more than one dredging cycle to create marsh In such areas and much material Is lost. The Ideal area for marsh creation consists of nearly totally enclosed ponds that are 1-3 feet deep. The utilization of sediment Is more efficient In such areas. In order to estimate the Initial height of the dredged material, it is necessary to take into account such variables aa consolidation, subsidence, erosion, accretion, water depth, and sediment type. As we become more experienced we became more accurate in our estimates. In 1981, we created 600 acres of marsh in Avoca Lake by diking the area and limiting Initial height to 3.0 HLG feet. Now over half of this marsh is gone. In our maintenance dredging this year, we will increase initial height of the material. 737
738 Future Harsh Creation. We are now authorized to dredge the Hisslsslppi River to -55 NGVD. When we do so, we will move 57 million cubic yards of material during construction and 30 million cubic yards each year. We have calculated that we could create 55 square miles of marsh If all this material is used. In this project, we have Included funds to control initial height and to monitor and refine our marsh creation efforts. We have also completed the environmental documentation to create 500 acres of marsh on Baratarla Bay Waterway. Conclusion In summary, marsh Is more valuable than shallow open water. When we use dredged sediments to build marsh, some toxicants may enter the ecosystem, but concentrations should not be much above background levels. And since we are losing SO sq. mi. per year (and have lost one acre in the 16 minutes you have taken to read this paper) the benefits outweigh the losses. Literature Cited McCauley, J.E., D.R. Hancock, and R.A. Parr, "Maintenance Dredging and Four Polychaete Worms." Proceedings of Spocial Conference on Dredging and its Environmental Effects. Published by ASCE. 1976. Mlnello, T.J. end R.J. Zimmerman, "Fish Predatlon of Juvenile Brown Shrimp, Penaeus qztecus. Ives: The Effect of Simulated Spartlna Structure on Predatlon Rates." J. Exp. Marine Biol. Ecology 72:211-231. 1983. Odua, W.E. and J.C. Zleman, "The Importance of Vascular Plant Detritus to Estuaries." Pages 91-114, Proceedings 2nd Symposium on Coastal Harsh and Estuarine Management. Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, 1972. Oliver, J.S. and P.N. Slattery, "Effects of Dredging and Disposal on Some Benthos at Monterey Bay, California", Technical Paper 76-15. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Coastal Eng. Res. Center, 1976. Stlckney, R.R., "Effects of Intrscoastal Waterway Dredging on Icthyofauna and Benthic Hacrolnvertebrates", Skldaway Institute of Oceanography, Savannah, GA, Technical Report Scries No. 72-74. 1972. Turner, R.E., "Louisiana's Coastal Fisheries and Changing Environmental Conditions", pages 363-370. Proceedings of 3rd Coastal Harsh and Estuary Management Symposium. Louisiana State university, Division of Continuing Education, Baton Rouge, 1979.
- Page 276 and 277: these times that the increase in vu
- Page 278 and 279: econstruction projects. Conclusion
- Page 280 and 281: RESOLVING CONFLICTS/ASSESSING RISKS
- Page 282 and 283: 686 lightering is estimated at $69
- Page 284 and 285: BEACH EVOLUTION AFTER CAUSEWAY CONS
- Page 286 and 287: 690 and overriding the facility. Ic
- Page 288 and 289: Estuarine andCoastal Management - T
- Page 290 and 291: Inextricably wound up with religion
- Page 292 and 293: ethics is that advocated by Leopold
- Page 294 and 295: laboratory animals, lower animals a
- Page 296 and 297: Estuarine andCoastal Management-Too
- Page 298 and 299: Estuarine and Coastal Management To
- Page 300 and 301: 708 these projects. Our criteria fo
- Page 302 and 303: 710 S. alternlflora established on
- Page 304 and 305: 712 Additional compensation by ropl
- Page 306 and 307: 714 to the question of placement (l
- Page 308 and 309: 716 criteria adequate to achieve th
- Page 310 and 311: 718 Nixon, S. W. 1980. Between coas
- Page 312 and 313: 720 of them because of this distanc
- Page 314: 722 Light penetration Is probably o
- Page 317 and 318: Estuarine and CoastalManagement-Too
- Page 319 and 320: management emphasis Is now affectin
- Page 321 and 322: Estuarine andCoastal Management - T
- Page 323 and 324: 734 assemblages; Juvenile fish and
- Page 325: -J 736 The heavy material falls out
- Page 329 and 330: 740 Estuarine and Coastal Managemen
- Page 331 and 332: Estuarine andCoastal Management -To
- Page 333 and 334: This site also satisfied several ot
- Page 335 and 336: successful implementation of such a
- Page 337 and 338: 750 I.C.R.R Fig. I
- Page 339 and 340: 752 More lumber companieslaunched o
- Page 341 and 342: 754 the track. When ties nasoed rep
- Page 343 and 344: 756 Schlleder spared no expense, no
- Page 345 and 346: 758 Stover, j. F. 1955. The Railroa
- Page 347 and 348: Estuarine and Coastal Management -
- Page 349 and 350: Estuarineand Coastal Management•
- Page 351 and 352: contain detailed Information about
- Page 353 and 354: production Is uncertain. Thus, the
- Page 355 and 356: Estuarine and Coastal Management To
- Page 357 and 358: MANAGING LIVING RESOURCES
- Page 359 and 360: 776 seagrasses and associated biota
- Page 361 and 362: 778 FLORIDA BIG BEND SEAGRASS HABIT
- Page 363 and 364: 780 Barle, S. A. 1972. Benthic alga
- Page 365 and 366: Estuarine andCoastal Management-Too
- Page 367 and 368: The Florida alligator nuisance prog
- Page 369 and 370: In Louisiana, a computer simulation
- Page 371 and 372: Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish C
- Page 373 and 374: Estuarine and CoastalManagement - T
- Page 375 and 376: 794 Mississippi Born * Island Petit
we entertain <strong>the</strong>ir suggestions for judicious use of <strong>the</strong> dredge<br />
material.<br />
Southwest Pass. We first started creating marsh with dredged material<br />
along Southwest Pass of <strong>the</strong> Hisslsslppi Elver. There we discovered that<br />
If we kept <strong>the</strong> initial height of <strong>the</strong> material below six feet, it would<br />
generally compact and settle into <strong>the</strong> Intertldal zone and marsh grasses<br />
would colonize it. Moving <strong>the</strong> dredge pipe more often would probably<br />
create more marsh. However, with our limited maintenance budget, this<br />
Is not possible. We have chosen an enclosed area on <strong>the</strong> South side of<br />
<strong>the</strong> pass and applied for money under Section 150 of <strong>the</strong> Water Resources<br />
and Development Act of 1976. We would use <strong>the</strong> money to keep <strong>the</strong> initial<br />
height at five feet and monitor this to see if more marsh is created.<br />
We are presently dealing with <strong>the</strong> leasors of <strong>the</strong> land to attempt to work<br />
out Institutional problens.<br />
Harsh Creation. Table 1 indicates <strong>the</strong> acres of marsh we have created<br />
by<br />
TABLE 1<br />
ACRES OF MARSH CREATED<br />
Location Land Ownership Harsh Hud Flats !/<br />
KR-GO jetties State 30 140<br />
MR-GO inland Private 20<br />
Tiger Pass State 230<br />
Avoca Lake Private 600<br />
Sweet Lake State 90<br />
Sabine NWR Federal refuge 200<br />
Atachafalaya Delta State mgmt area 60 300<br />
V These will probably become marsh once we place dredged material on<br />
<strong>the</strong>m again.<br />
carefully choosing disposal sites and moving <strong>the</strong> dredge pipe as often as<br />
practical. As can be seen, we have tried to build marsh on public lands<br />
as often as possible and have built it in state water bottoms in o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
cases. Occasionally ve have no choice but to place <strong>the</strong> material in 4to<br />
6-foot deep open water. It takes more than one dredging cycle to<br />
create marsh In such areas and much material Is lost. The Ideal area<br />
for marsh creation consists of nearly totally enclosed ponds that are<br />
1-3 feet deep. The utilization of sediment Is more efficient In such<br />
areas. In order to estimate <strong>the</strong> Initial height of <strong>the</strong> dredged material,<br />
it is necessary to take into account such variables aa consolidation,<br />
subsidence, erosion, accretion, water depth, and sediment type. As we<br />
become more experienced we became more accurate in our estimates. In<br />
1981, we created 600 acres of marsh in Avoca Lake by diking <strong>the</strong> area and<br />
limiting Initial height to 3.0 HLG feet. Now over half of this marsh is<br />
gone. In our maintenance dredging this year, we will increase initial<br />
height of <strong>the</strong> material.<br />
737