11.02.2013
•
Views
REFERENCES Federal Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, 16 U.S.C. 1451(a) New Jersey Statutes Annotated 12:5-3; 13:10-1; 7:7-2.4; 13:10-29; 13:10-1 New Jersey Department of Environmental, Division of Coastal Resources, Rules on Coastal Resources and Development, N.J.A.C. 7:7E-1.1 et. seq. New Jersey Hudson River Uaterfrnt Tally, Port Authority of N.Y. and N.J., Planning and Development Department, Summer 1986 New York State Environmental Conservalton Law, Articles 34, 40, 42 New York City Waterfront Revltallzatton Legislation, N.Y. City Charter, Section 197 New York City's Waterfront: A Plan For Development, New York City Public Development Corportatlon, July 1986 401
Estuarine and Coastal Management • Tootsof the Trade. Proceedingsof theTenthNationalConference of TheCoastal Society. October 12-15.1986. New Orleans. LA. Copyright by The Coastal Society 1987. LAND USE PLANNING UNDER THE GUISE OFCAMA IN NORTH CAROLINA Richard A. Stephenson Urbanand RegionalPlanning Program East CarolinaUniversity Greenville, NC 278344353 The Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) was ratified in the State of North Carolina in 1974. This was a last minute effort by the legis lature to interface with the federal legislation passed in 1971. Many planners felt that the difficulties In ratifying the legislation re vealed a low level of support by the people. While CAMA Is now accepted by many citizens, there are still some that have a problem with it. This is not uncommon with respect to land use controls, and CAMA is leg islation for guiding land and water use. As the bill states, "In the im plementation of the coastal area management plan, the public's opportu nity to enjoy the physical, esthetic, cultural, and recreational quali ties of the natural shorelines of the State shall be preserved to the greatest extent feasible; water resources shall be managed in order to preserve and enhance water quality and to provide optimum utilization of water resources; land resources shall be managed In order to guide growth and development and to minimize damage to the natural environ ment; and private property rights shall be preserved in accord with the Constitution of this State and of the United States" (NCAC, 1974). In the early 1970's only a few states had adopted applicable state wide land use regulatory systems (Cuernsey, 1972). Hawaii was the first state to adopt a comprehensive land use law in 1961. Wisconsin followed with legislation in 1966 to protect all shorelines. In 1970 Florida passed legislation for the purpose of developing a comprehensive plan for the protection, development and zoning of the coastal zone. Cali fornia began with some piecemeal efforts related to the coastal zone in 1968, but did not achieve a comprehensive land use planning effort until 1972. In 1969 the Texas legislation began to study coastal related prob lems, but the study was not completed until 1972. Generally, none of the coastal zone management and planning programs at the state level moved as fast nor as far as they needed to in order to resolve land use Issues and 403
-
Page 1 and 2:
HT 390 .C66 C66 1986 v.2 Thomas EBi
-
Page 3 and 4:
Copyright® 1987 The Coastal Societ
-
Page 5 and 6:
"PROPERTY OF NOAA COASTAL K_CE3 CEN
-
Page 7 and 8:
PLENARY SESSIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS
-
Page 9 and 10:
CHARACTERIZING A SYSTEM Choir. Char
-
Page 11 and 12:
TRACKING TOXICS Chair Susan Harvey
-
Page 13 and 14:
The Use ofthe NationalWater DataExc
-
Page 15 and 16:
The Site Selection Process foraChes
-
Page 17 and 18:
MANAGING LIVING RESOURCES Resource
-
Page 19 and 20:
Estuarine and CoastalManagement - T
-
Page 21 and 22:
398 the particular Interests, envir
-
Page 23:
400 data, a developer may discover
-
Page 27 and 28:
fortune to work with several coasta
-
Page 29 and 30:
growth economics, local feelings ab
-
Page 31 and 32:
410 unprotected coastal barriers wi
-
Page 33 and 34:
412 caveats. The greatest concerns
-
Page 35 and 36:
Estuarine and Coastal Management -
-
Page 37 and 38:
Model of Resort Evolution R. Initia
-
Page 39 and 40:
Pensacola Beach Like Fort Myers Bea
-
Page 41 and 42:
had again contributed to serious en
-
Page 43 and 44:
Estuarine andCoastal Management -To
-
Page 45 and 46:
High altitude and oblique aerial ph
-
Page 47 and 48:
Estuarineand Coastal Management•
-
Page 50 and 51:
432 system, the LEO system is start
-
Page 52 and 53:
434 b. Hind observations (Figure 5)
-
Page 54 and 55:
436 LEO PERCENT OCCURRENCE OF WAVE
-
Page 56 and 57:
438 Estuarine and Coastal Managemen
-
Page 58 and 59:
440 appropriate variables and param
-
Page 60 and 61:
STEPbTSB NBICHBOB SBCBDI CANDISC NE
-
Page 62 and 63:
Estuarineand Coastal Management Too
-
Page 64 and 65:
(figures 1 and 2). On a first order
-
Page 66 and 67:
variables. This resulted in a set o
-
Page 69 and 70:
Estuarine andCoastal Management •
-
Page 71 and 72:
help canaands and dictionaries are
-
Page 73 and 74:
Access to System All requests for a
-
Page 75 and 76:
460 Why Is NOAA Unarmed In ftnMfal
-
Page 77 and 78:
462 To test this procedure, a simpl
-
Page 79 and 80:
464 Cowardln, L.M.. V. Carter, F.C.
-
Page 81 and 82:
466 between the participating indiv
-
Page 83 and 84:
468 Data Search Assistance Through
-
Page 85 and 86:
470 Additional Information For addi
-
Page 87 and 88:
472 Estuarine andCoastal Management
-
Page 89 and 90:
474 FIGURE 2 OPDIN RESOURCES NMPIS
-
Page 91 and 92:
476 means ot access, determination
-
Page 93 and 94:
478 NMPPO. 1985b. Inventory of Non-
-
Page 95 and 96:
480 Estuarine andCoastal Management
-
Page 97 and 98:
EDUCATING DECISIONMAKERS William Ei
-
Page 99 and 100:
prediction of the effects of changi
-
Page 101 and 102:
Management Oommittee did slightly r
-
Page 103 and 104:
The causes of the degradation of wa
-
Page 105 and 106:
quality. For a commission to adopt
-
Page 107 and 108:
494 Estuarine and Coastal Managemen
-
Page 109 and 110:
496 authorities prior to any land d
-
Page 111 and 112:
498 boon based largely on ono piece
-
Page 113 and 114:
500 Interstate Agreement on Chesape
-
Page 115 and 116:
Estuarine and Coastal Management -T
-
Page 117 and 118:
In general, though, these relations
-
Page 119 and 120:
meetings. Their recommendations ver
-
Page 121 and 122:
etveen any other academic departmen
-
Page 123 and 124:
Many of these same demands vere mad
-
Page 125 and 126:
Estuarineand Coastal Management- To
-
Page 127 and 128:
The private sector The motivation f
-
Page 129 and 130:
It's more and more obvious: those w
-
Page 131 and 132:
The Center's role is limited to ide
-
Page 133 and 134:
Estuarine and Coastal Management -
-
Page 135 and 136:
County. The resulting roport, "Cons
-
Page 137 and 138:
and shellflshing; to provide open s
-
Page 139 and 140:
The COD is innovative as a performa
-
Page 141 and 142:
Estuarine andCoastal Management - T
-
Page 143 and 144:
provide adequate information for a
-
Page 145 and 146:
Aquaculture project The most recent
-
Page 147 and 148:
Estuarine andCoastal Management - T
-
Page 149 and 150:
CHESAPEAKEBAY VirginiaTippie,Chair
-
Page 151 and 152:
542 program with an investment of 2
-
Page 153 and 154:
544 Estuarine andCoastal Management
-
Page 155 and 156:
Estuarine andCoastalManagement - To
-
Page 157 and 158:
methodology being proposed - develo
-
Page 159 and 160:
major sections of the 1972 Clean Wa
-
Page 161 and 162:
Prioritizing makes best use of the
-
Page 163 and 164:
Degradation of the Bay has taken a
-
Page 165 and 166:
558 federal agencies, additional tr
-
Page 167 and 168:
560 ing system 1t would be helpful
-
Page 169 and 170:
Estuarine and Coastal Management -
-
Page 171 and 172:
obtained, or shoreline changes-were
-
Page 173 and 174:
SAV was sighted as well as water co
-
Page 175 and 176:
canadensis and Zannlchelia palustri
-
Page 177 and 178:
greatest percent increases occurrin
-
Page 179 and 180:
Orth, R.J., K.L. Heck, Jr. and J. v
-
Page 181 and 182:
Estuarineand Coastal Management- To
-
Page 183 and 184:
Bromley (1978) considered (1) propo
-
Page 185 and 186:
2. Rnyulntorv nrogram-i A number of
-
Page 187 and 188:
private nuisance is an interference
-
Page 189 and 190:
property rule. If Congress passed s
-
Page 191 and 192:
nonpoint source water pollution con
-
Page 193 and 194:
Estuarineand CoastalManagement - To
-
Page 195 and 196:
cannot be granted unless there is u
-
Page 197 and 198:
ecomes subject to cancellation. An
-
Page 199 and 200:
REFERENCES Morrison, M.D. and M.K.
-
Page 201 and 202:
598 other agencies are Involved in
-
Page 203 and 204:
600 requirements for dumping of ves
-
Page 205 and 206:
602 oatorlal in the future. The oil
-
Page 207 and 208:
Estuarineand Coastal Management- To
-
Page 209 and 210:
Application of the doctrine of Impl
-
Page 211:
oundaries of the dry sand area and
-
Page 214 and 215:
Estuarineand Coastal Management- To
-
Page 216 and 217:
compilation of existing data. Areas
-
Page 218 and 219:
To rank areas based on observed con
-
Page 220 and 221:
In spatial coverage of previous stu
-
Page 222 and 223:
Estuarineand Coastal Management- To
-
Page 224 and 225:
satellites to the reserve system, a
-
Page 226 and 227:
types of geomorphological features
-
Page 228 and 229:
Manao-gmgnr conaldpratH onn — The
-
Page 230 and 231:
productivity. The National Estuarin
-
Page 232 and 233:
Estuarine and Coastal Management To
-
Page 234 and 235:
equired to validate the sensitivity
-
Page 236 and 237:
goal, an uncertainty analysis was c
-
Page 238 and 239:
Precision of the sediment quality v
-
Page 240 and 241:
Estuarine andCoastal Management -To
-
Page 242 and 243:
Independent variable that is assume
-
Page 244 and 245:
Possible outcomes of the experiment
-
Page 246 and 247:
PREPARING FOR EMERGENCIES James McQ
-
Page 248 and 249:
648 The evacuation of more than 500
-
Page 250 and 251:
650 terminal; $220,000 for an oil s
-
Page 252 and 253:
652 U.S. Highway 98 damage estimate
-
Page 254 and 255:
654 Spangenbcrg, T. 1986. Personal
-
Page 256 and 257:
LOUISIANA'S BATTLEWITH THE SEA; ITS
-
Page 258 and 259:
Estuarineand Coastal Management- To
-
Page 260 and 261:
Qco ISLES DERltt^ km & Figure 2. Hi
-
Page 262 and 263:
Objectives The first objective of t
-
Page 264 and 265:
STATION NUMBER STATION NAME TABLE 1
-
Page 266 and 267:
The St. Petersburg tide gauge stati
-
Page 268 and 269:
STATION NUMBER STATION NAME TABLE 2
-
Page 270 and 271:
elative sea level rise is 0.33 cm/y
-
Page 272 and 273:
References Byrne, P., Borengasser,
-
Page 274 and 275:
Estuarineand Coastal Management- To
-
Page 276 and 277:
these times that the increase in vu
-
Page 278 and 279:
econstruction projects. Conclusion
-
Page 280 and 281:
RESOLVING CONFLICTS/ASSESSING RISKS
-
Page 282 and 283:
686 lightering is estimated at $69
-
Page 284 and 285:
BEACH EVOLUTION AFTER CAUSEWAY CONS
-
Page 286 and 287:
690 and overriding the facility. Ic
-
Page 288 and 289:
Estuarine andCoastal Management - T
-
Page 290 and 291:
Inextricably wound up with religion
-
Page 292 and 293:
ethics is that advocated by Leopold
-
Page 294 and 295:
laboratory animals, lower animals a
-
Page 296 and 297:
Estuarine andCoastal Management-Too
-
Page 298 and 299:
Estuarine and Coastal Management To
-
Page 300 and 301:
708 these projects. Our criteria fo
-
Page 302 and 303:
710 S. alternlflora established on
-
Page 304 and 305:
712 Additional compensation by ropl
-
Page 306 and 307:
714 to the question of placement (l
-
Page 308 and 309:
716 criteria adequate to achieve th
-
Page 310 and 311:
718 Nixon, S. W. 1980. Between coas
-
Page 312 and 313:
720 of them because of this distanc
-
Page 314:
722 Light penetration Is probably o
-
Page 317 and 318:
Estuarine and CoastalManagement-Too
-
Page 319 and 320:
management emphasis Is now affectin
-
Page 321 and 322:
Estuarine andCoastal Management - T
-
Page 323 and 324:
734 assemblages; Juvenile fish and
-
Page 325 and 326:
-J 736 The heavy material falls out
-
Page 327 and 328:
738 Future Harsh Creation. We are n
-
Page 329 and 330:
740 Estuarine and Coastal Managemen
-
Page 331 and 332:
Estuarine andCoastal Management -To
-
Page 333 and 334:
This site also satisfied several ot
-
Page 335 and 336:
successful implementation of such a
-
Page 337 and 338:
750 I.C.R.R Fig. I
-
Page 339 and 340:
752 More lumber companieslaunched o
-
Page 341 and 342:
754 the track. When ties nasoed rep
-
Page 343 and 344:
756 Schlleder spared no expense, no
-
Page 345 and 346:
758 Stover, j. F. 1955. The Railroa
-
Page 347 and 348:
Estuarine and Coastal Management -
-
Page 349 and 350:
Estuarineand Coastal Management•
-
Page 351 and 352:
contain detailed Information about
-
Page 353 and 354:
production Is uncertain. Thus, the
-
Page 355 and 356:
Estuarine and Coastal Management To
-
Page 357 and 358:
MANAGING LIVING RESOURCES
-
Page 359 and 360:
776 seagrasses and associated biota
-
Page 361 and 362:
778 FLORIDA BIG BEND SEAGRASS HABIT
-
Page 363 and 364:
780 Barle, S. A. 1972. Benthic alga
-
Page 365 and 366:
Estuarine andCoastal Management-Too
-
Page 367 and 368:
The Florida alligator nuisance prog
-
Page 369 and 370:
In Louisiana, a computer simulation
-
Page 371 and 372:
Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish C
-
Page 373 and 374:
Estuarine and CoastalManagement - T
-
Page 375 and 376:
794 Mississippi Born * Island Petit
-
Page 377 and 378:
796" important means of preserving
-
Page 379:
f 798 man-modified environments. Th
Change language