11.02.2013 Views

Full document / COSOC-W-86-002 - the National Sea Grant Library

Full document / COSOC-W-86-002 - the National Sea Grant Library

Full document / COSOC-W-86-002 - the National Sea Grant Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

occurs because a negligent Inspection Is not In compliance with <strong>the</strong><br />

terms and conditions of <strong>the</strong> permit.<br />

There are certain risks involved in construction and maintenance stages<br />

that should be considered in planning a reef. The area Involved and<br />

<strong>the</strong> type of material used must be matched so that <strong>the</strong> materials are<br />

suitable, a requirement of <strong>the</strong> NFEA. Materials must also be free of<br />

pollutants in order to meet <strong>the</strong> suitability requirement.<br />

If a state or one of Its political subdivisions (a county or<br />

municipality) is <strong>the</strong> permittee, it may be able to assert <strong>the</strong> doctrine<br />

of sovereign immunity. The immunity, if applicable, is absolute and<br />

will operate to defeat <strong>the</strong> claim of <strong>the</strong> Injured party. States are<br />

generally Immune from all types of negligence actions, although state<br />

officials have only a limited privilege of individual immunity. In <strong>the</strong><br />

typical reef scenario, Individual official actions can be divided into<br />

those that arc discretionary in nature and those that are ministerial.<br />

Discretionary decisions are normally covered by Immunity, while<br />

nlnlsterlal actions are not. Discretionary decisions would Include <strong>the</strong><br />

initial decision to construct a reef and <strong>the</strong> choice of location and<br />

materials. Ministerial actions would Include <strong>the</strong> placement of <strong>the</strong><br />

materials and <strong>the</strong> maintenance of <strong>the</strong> reef, including negligent<br />

inspections.<br />

The Immunity of a county or municipality of a state is derivative, and<br />

<strong>the</strong>refore is not as strong as <strong>the</strong> state's Immunity. Sovereign immunity<br />

can be explained by characterizing <strong>the</strong> actions of such entities as<br />

governmental or proprietary. Governmental actions are generally those<br />

considered to be necessary to <strong>the</strong> public welfare, while proprietary<br />

actions are those not actually necessary, even though <strong>the</strong>y do benefit<br />

<strong>the</strong> public. An artificial reef would fall in <strong>the</strong> latter category.<br />

Thus, in those Instances where a permittee is not protected by <strong>the</strong><br />

provision concerning actions required to bo undertaken by <strong>the</strong> permit,<br />

normal rules of negligence apply. Sovereign inounlty is one defense<br />

that may be available, a strong defense In <strong>the</strong> case of a state as <strong>the</strong><br />

permittee, but a weaker possibility when a county or city is <strong>the</strong><br />

permittee.<br />

603

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!