11.02.2013 Views

Full document / COSOC-W-86-002 - the National Sea Grant Library

Full document / COSOC-W-86-002 - the National Sea Grant Library

Full document / COSOC-W-86-002 - the National Sea Grant Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Bromley (1978) considered (1) proporty rules, (2) liability<br />

rules, and (3) inalienability rules as tho rule3 by which rights<br />

are protected. His framework is as follows. Given two parties,<br />

A and B, if: 1) A owns tha »ntttl«m«nt-- When A is protected by<br />

a property rule, A may interforo with B and can only bo stopped<br />

if B buys off A. When A is protoctod by a liability rule, B may<br />

stop A from interfering but must coaponsato A. 2) B ssms. <strong>the</strong><br />

nntltlemant— When B is protectod by a property rulo, A may not<br />

interfere with B without B's consent. When B is protected by a<br />

liability rule, A may Interfere with B but must compensate B.<br />

Whan B is protected by inalienability, A may not interfere with B<br />

under any circumstances and tho stopping does not imply<br />

compensation. Bromley (1978) also notes that transactions costs<br />

will be higher when entitlomonts aro protected undor proporty<br />

rules ra<strong>the</strong>r than liability rulos bocauso tho property rule<br />

requires a prior agreement among tho partios. He suggests that,<br />

as a result, Interference will likely bo greater undor tho<br />

latter.<br />

Property mflhts and Nonpoint gojllfia Pollution Control<br />

The allocation of property rights to wator and its use is not<br />

explicitly defined. Thoro is precedent to suggest that <strong>the</strong>se<br />

rights are owned in most casos by tbo farmers. Indeed, under tho<br />

current program of voluntary BHP implementation, it can bo argued<br />

that farmers have been ondowed with tho rights to <strong>the</strong> "use" of<br />

water. With tho current program, those rights are protected<br />

under a property rule, and may bo "purchased" by <strong>the</strong> public if<br />

farmers choose to exchange thoir rights to create nonpoint source<br />

pollution for cost sharing assistance in controlling <strong>the</strong><br />

pollution.<br />

Altni-nflttvn Programs<br />

Along with <strong>the</strong> questions regarding <strong>the</strong> effectivonoss of <strong>the</strong><br />

current nonpoint control program have como suggestions for<br />

alternative programs.<br />

Major Program Alternatives includo:<br />

(1) Cross compliance • government farm program;<br />

(2) Regulatory schemes - BHPs • required by law;<br />

(3) Soil loss tax;<br />

(ft) Tax credit, tax deduction, tax oxpendituro;<br />

(5) Enforcement of common law;<br />

(6) Purchase of rights.<br />

579

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!