Full document / COSOC-W-86-002 - the National Sea Grant Library
Full document / COSOC-W-86-002 - the National Sea Grant Library Full document / COSOC-W-86-002 - the National Sea Grant Library
SHAPING SHORELINE USES J. Kevin Sullivan, Chair
Estuarine and CoastalManagement - Tooti of the Trade. Proceedingsofthe Took NationalConference of TheCoastal Society. October12-15.1936. New Orleans.LA. Copyrightby TheCoastalSociety 1987. MARYLAND CRITICAL AREA PROGRAM SarahTaylor and J. Kevin Sullivan Chesapeake Bay CriticalAreas Commission Department of Natural Resources Tawes State Office Building Annapolis. MD 21401 Abstract only The Chesapeake Bay CriticalArea ProtectionLaw (Natural Resources Article 8-1801 - 8- 1816)was passedby the GeneralAssembly in 1984becauseofconcernaboutthe declineofcertain natural resources of the Chesapeake Bay. Recent studies by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency andothershave shown thatthis declineis relatedto the intensityofhumanactivities within the watershedofthe Bay. In orderto begin to addressthese sourcesof impact, the GeneralAssembly designated a geographical areaaroundthe tidal watersofthe ChesapeakeBay and its tributaries as the "Critical Area." It directedthatnew developmentin this area be suchas to minimize impactson the Bay's water quality and plant, fish, and wildlife habitat. Pursuant to the requirements of the Law, the ChesapeakeBay CriticalAreaCommission was established to develop criteriafor guiding local jurisdictionsin developing programs forCritical Area. The processof approval for thesecriteria as con be imagined,was fraught with political pitfalls and enhancements - all of which resultedin a set of landmark land-useguidelines for developmentaroundthe Bay which passedGeneralAssembly scrutinyin April of 1986. At this time, theCommissionwill seek to work with60 jurisdictions in helpingthem use thecriteria in the development of theirlocal Critical AreaProtection Programs. 395
- Page 1 and 2: HT 390 .C66 C66 1986 v.2 Thomas EBi
- Page 3 and 4: Copyright® 1987 The Coastal Societ
- Page 5 and 6: "PROPERTY OF NOAA COASTAL K_CE3 CEN
- Page 7 and 8: PLENARY SESSIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS
- Page 9 and 10: CHARACTERIZING A SYSTEM Choir. Char
- Page 11 and 12: TRACKING TOXICS Chair Susan Harvey
- Page 13 and 14: The Use ofthe NationalWater DataExc
- Page 15 and 16: The Site Selection Process foraChes
- Page 17: MANAGING LIVING RESOURCES Resource
- Page 21 and 22: 398 the particular Interests, envir
- Page 23 and 24: 400 data, a developer may discover
- Page 25 and 26: Estuarine and Coastal Management
- Page 27 and 28: fortune to work with several coasta
- Page 29 and 30: growth economics, local feelings ab
- Page 31 and 32: 410 unprotected coastal barriers wi
- Page 33 and 34: 412 caveats. The greatest concerns
- Page 35 and 36: Estuarine and Coastal Management -
- Page 37 and 38: Model of Resort Evolution R. Initia
- Page 39 and 40: Pensacola Beach Like Fort Myers Bea
- Page 41 and 42: had again contributed to serious en
- Page 43 and 44: Estuarine andCoastal Management -To
- Page 45 and 46: High altitude and oblique aerial ph
- Page 47 and 48: Estuarineand Coastal Management•
- Page 50 and 51: 432 system, the LEO system is start
- Page 52 and 53: 434 b. Hind observations (Figure 5)
- Page 54 and 55: 436 LEO PERCENT OCCURRENCE OF WAVE
- Page 56 and 57: 438 Estuarine and Coastal Managemen
- Page 58 and 59: 440 appropriate variables and param
- Page 60 and 61: STEPbTSB NBICHBOB SBCBDI CANDISC NE
- Page 62 and 63: Estuarineand Coastal Management Too
- Page 64 and 65: (figures 1 and 2). On a first order
- Page 66 and 67: variables. This resulted in a set o
SHAPING SHORELINE USES<br />
J. Kevin Sullivan, Chair
Change language