11.02.2013 Views

Full document / COSOC-W-86-002 - the National Sea Grant Library

Full document / COSOC-W-86-002 - the National Sea Grant Library

Full document / COSOC-W-86-002 - the National Sea Grant Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

methodology being proposed - developing <strong>the</strong> linkage between <strong>the</strong>se major<br />

components of <strong>the</strong> Chesapeake Bay ecosystem.<br />

The linkage described also serves as a major tenet in <strong>the</strong> Environmental<br />

Protection Agency's concept of "Phase II" of Its mld-1980's Implemention<br />

Plan to restore <strong>the</strong> Bay's resources. Although o<strong>the</strong>r factors can<br />

strongly affect <strong>the</strong>se estuarine waters, eg., a climatic episode such as<br />

storm Agnea In 1972, <strong>the</strong>se may be uncontrollable by man. In many<br />

respects, "day-by-day" water quality is largely determined by <strong>the</strong><br />

activities of humans, however. In <strong>the</strong> case of Chesapeake Bay, a rapidly<br />

expanding surrounding human population has Indisputably degraded <strong>the</strong><br />

waters, and in turn <strong>the</strong> living resources. Degradation having <strong>the</strong>se<br />

origins can be reduced.<br />

EPA produced in 1981 a valuable<br />

segmentation map, shown at left.<br />

Using historical data and also some<br />

data from its <strong>the</strong>n-ongoing research<br />

phase of Chesapeake Bay Program work<br />

(1977-1983), <strong>the</strong> agency characterized<br />

In specific ways water quality la <strong>the</strong><br />

various segments shown on <strong>the</strong> map.<br />

Theso baseline data are valuable for<br />

at least two reasons. They can be<br />

used to match up with known<br />

historical and geographical<br />

information about living resources,<br />

in order to determine how <strong>the</strong><br />

degraded (or clean) water may be<br />

affecting <strong>the</strong> organisms In question.<br />

The CIA process mentioned earlier can<br />

assist tn such comparisons and<br />

analyses.<br />

For instance, an EPA segment might be<br />

known from field data to have high<br />

levels of DDT metabolites In its<br />

sediments. This could <strong>the</strong>n be<br />

correlated with lack of breeding<br />

success of osprey, eagles or even<br />

breeding black ducks known to attempt<br />

to reproduce In <strong>the</strong> area.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> especially Important area of toxics, knowing which toxicants are<br />

located where, and In what concentration, will be vital Information in<br />

determining both a key organism's "health", and also <strong>the</strong> strategy or<br />

water quality goal to effect improvements. For heavy metals<br />

EPA has developed toxicity indices for areas of <strong>the</strong> Bay, and also a<br />

standard sediment "Contaminant Index" which will be useful to this end.<br />

Similar work is needed for organic toxicants.<br />

The second way in which earlier baseline water quality data will be<br />

useful will be in <strong>the</strong> comparison with <strong>the</strong> comprehensive Bay monitoring<br />

program set up in 1984 by EPA and <strong>the</strong> States. The voluminous data now<br />

549

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!