11.02.2013 Views

Full document / COSOC-W-86-002 - the National Sea Grant Library

Full document / COSOC-W-86-002 - the National Sea Grant Library

Full document / COSOC-W-86-002 - the National Sea Grant Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Estuarine andCoastal Management - Tools of<strong>the</strong> Abstract only<br />

Trade. Proceedings of ihe Tenth <strong>National</strong> Conference<br />

of TheCoastalSociety. October 12-15.19<strong>86</strong>. New<br />

Orleans.LA. Copyrightby TheCoastalSociety<br />

1987.<br />

THE USE OF ZONING REGULATIONS TO REDUCE<br />

COMPETITION BETWEEN COASTAL DEPENDENTUSES<br />

AND NON-COASTAL DEPENDENTUSES<br />

A. Kevin Crawfordand CharlesT. McCaffrey<br />

DepartmentofState<br />

Albany,NY 12231<br />

In New York State, as elsewherethroughout<strong>the</strong> nation,development pressurein coastal<br />

areasis substantialand increasing. The result is often to limit public access to, and recreationaluse<br />

of, <strong>the</strong> shore, as well as to drive out commercial and industrial operations which depend on a<br />

waterfront location. In New York, several types of development, but particularly residential<br />

development, compete with coastal dependent uses for waterfront land. Without regulatory<br />

controls and o<strong>the</strong>r government incentives, coastal dependent uses for increasingly scarce suitable<br />

waterfront sites.<br />

It is state policy in New York, as expressedin <strong>the</strong> State'sWaterfront Revitalizationand<br />

Coastal Resources Act and its Coastal Management Program, to promotepublicaccess,recreation,<br />

and coastaldependent uses. While <strong>the</strong> State has severalmeans for fur<strong>the</strong>ring this policy, local<br />

governments through<strong>the</strong>ir land use regulations arein <strong>the</strong> best positionto managethis competition<br />

between uses;and zoning is <strong>the</strong> most appropriate tool at <strong>the</strong>irdisposal.<br />

The range of approaches include single use zoning districts, e.g., a marine commercial<br />

districtwith all o<strong>the</strong>ruses prohibited, zoningdistricts which permita rangeof compatibleuses but<br />

not <strong>the</strong>principal competing uses,suchas residential development; zoning districts whichpermit<br />

competing uses but afford incentives in <strong>the</strong> form ofdevelopment bonuses to <strong>the</strong> desired coastal<br />

dependent uses; and zoning districts which require mixed use development, i.e., non-coastal<br />

dependent uses are permittedonly if <strong>the</strong>y also provide forcoastaldependent uses. The specific<br />

approach, or combination ofapproaches, a municipality shouldtake will depend upon <strong>the</strong> coastal<br />

dependent uses appropriate to its waterfront and, equally important, upon <strong>the</strong> degree of<br />

development pressurecoming from non-coastaldependent uses.<br />

Since implementing such regulations mayoften result inareduction in property values<br />

and be contraryto <strong>the</strong> development expectationsofpropertyowners, need forcarein draftingsuch<br />

zoning regulations is emphasized. The municipality must havea clearideaofpreciselywhat uses<br />

areto be promoted,as well as <strong>the</strong> nature of developmentpressures thatexist. It must particularly<br />

be able to draftregulations in a constitutional and legallyauthorizedmanner. The "due process"<br />

and "taking" issues must be considered.<br />

537

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!