Full document / COSOC-W-86-002 - the National Sea Grant Library
Full document / COSOC-W-86-002 - the National Sea Grant Library Full document / COSOC-W-86-002 - the National Sea Grant Library
516 There is an urgent and unprecedented need for management policies that will arrest the resulting environmental problems before marine systems are irreversibly degraded and their valuable resources irretrievably lost and multiple dwelling units elbow out recreational opportunities and natural habitats while asphalt substitutes for ambiance. Framework for Managing Entuariw Preservaticn Protection of the nation's estuaries has been identified as a national priority. Congress has charged the Environmental Protection Agency with the responsibilities for restoring water quality and living resources through improved estuary management. To carry out the Congressional authorization, EPA established the national Estuary Program (NEP) within the Office of Marine and Estuarine Protection (OMEP). One national program is implemented through the EPA Regional Offices under the guidance of the OMEP. To provide assurance of strong scientific support Congress has charged the National Oceanographic Atmospheric Administration (N.O.A.A.) through the National Estuarine Management Office to take responsibility for research into living resources and habitat protection. The U.S. Pish and Wildlife Service and the Army Corps of Engineers make up the remainder of the responsible agencies of the federal government. Host states bordering our nation's estuaries have established environmental management structures to deal with coastal and estuarine systems. For example: Some states have taken the initiative to deal directly with the critical land areas within 1000 feet of shore. Towns and cities bordering coastal areas and bays have recognized their role as the first line of defense against estuarine degradation. Ccrmunity and municipal officials have the direct responsibility for sewage treatment, land use planning, zoning and agricultural practices. In some states, officials from towns and cities at the headwaters of rivers and streams have recognized their role in the restoration and preservation effort and have begun to address the problem of deforestation and land conversion on bays and estuaries many miles down stream. This formal institutional structure is held responsible for defining the problem, developing a framework for action, setting goals and designing mechanises for achieving those goals. Some way trust be found for the these institutions and the people who man them to sustain the will and the necessary resources for the decades required to achieve water quality and habitat protection goals.
The private sector The motivation for restoring and preserving our estuaries, has come, as well, from an aroused public. The ultimate success of any cleanup effort depends upon the public remaining concerned. Government efforts at estuarine protection must be monitored and participated in by the public to ensure that water quality goals are achieved. The public must build and sustain the constituency to help government environmental managers maintain the needed resources to complete the restoration effort. "Users' of the estuary and of resources that affect estuarine quality — fishermen, boaters, the merchant marine, industries, farmers, tourists and the residents of the coorainities connected to the coast by land or streams abutting the coast must find ways to build comprehensive coalitions to support the needed action to restore and protect the coastal environment. Tha scientific cctrtrunlty GOTernment-spcnsored science and research is revealing the status of water quality and living resources in major estuarine watersheds. However, baseline data has not been established for every estuary. The ultimate success of any restoration effort will depend upon the extent of the data base and the quality of research facilities focused on the estuary. The purpose of this paper is to recognize how the traditional tools of regulation and enforcement are being employed by environmental managers today to find ways to manage the restoration and preservation effort and consider some new tools available to them which recognize the realities of today's "Nobody's in Charge Society". Beyond that we present for consideration what government decision makers will need to do to make environmental management decisions that stick as they get used totheir leadership role in a world of "upside-down pyramids". Leadership of the Tnfonwd He are indebted to Harlan Cleveland, Dean of the Hubert Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs, University of Minnesota, for clarifying the problem for us in a speech at the World Future Society Conference, New York, July 1986, and in his book entitled: The Knowledge Executive — Leadership in an Information Snclpfy. I will excerpt bis principal points: Shortly after the attempted assassination of President Reagan in 1981, Secretary of State Alexander Haig announced on television from the White Bouse that "I am in control here...." That statement produced neither reassurance nor anger from the American people: rather, the response was nervous laughter, as 517
- Page 75 and 76: 460 Why Is NOAA Unarmed In ftnMfal
- Page 77 and 78: 462 To test this procedure, a simpl
- Page 79 and 80: 464 Cowardln, L.M.. V. Carter, F.C.
- Page 81 and 82: 466 between the participating indiv
- Page 83 and 84: 468 Data Search Assistance Through
- Page 85 and 86: 470 Additional Information For addi
- Page 87 and 88: 472 Estuarine andCoastal Management
- Page 89 and 90: 474 FIGURE 2 OPDIN RESOURCES NMPIS
- Page 91 and 92: 476 means ot access, determination
- Page 93 and 94: 478 NMPPO. 1985b. Inventory of Non-
- Page 95 and 96: 480 Estuarine andCoastal Management
- Page 97 and 98: EDUCATING DECISIONMAKERS William Ei
- Page 99 and 100: prediction of the effects of changi
- Page 101 and 102: Management Oommittee did slightly r
- Page 103 and 104: The causes of the degradation of wa
- Page 105 and 106: quality. For a commission to adopt
- Page 107 and 108: 494 Estuarine and Coastal Managemen
- Page 109 and 110: 496 authorities prior to any land d
- Page 111 and 112: 498 boon based largely on ono piece
- Page 113 and 114: 500 Interstate Agreement on Chesape
- Page 115 and 116: Estuarine and Coastal Management -T
- Page 117 and 118: In general, though, these relations
- Page 119 and 120: meetings. Their recommendations ver
- Page 121 and 122: etveen any other academic departmen
- Page 123 and 124: Many of these same demands vere mad
- Page 125: Estuarineand Coastal Management- To
- Page 129 and 130: It's more and more obvious: those w
- Page 131 and 132: The Center's role is limited to ide
- Page 133 and 134: Estuarine and Coastal Management -
- Page 135 and 136: County. The resulting roport, "Cons
- Page 137 and 138: and shellflshing; to provide open s
- Page 139 and 140: The COD is innovative as a performa
- Page 141 and 142: Estuarine andCoastal Management - T
- Page 143 and 144: provide adequate information for a
- Page 145 and 146: Aquaculture project The most recent
- Page 147 and 148: Estuarine andCoastal Management - T
- Page 149 and 150: CHESAPEAKEBAY VirginiaTippie,Chair
- Page 151 and 152: 542 program with an investment of 2
- Page 153 and 154: 544 Estuarine andCoastal Management
- Page 155 and 156: Estuarine andCoastalManagement - To
- Page 157 and 158: methodology being proposed - develo
- Page 159 and 160: major sections of the 1972 Clean Wa
- Page 161 and 162: Prioritizing makes best use of the
- Page 163 and 164: Degradation of the Bay has taken a
- Page 165 and 166: 558 federal agencies, additional tr
- Page 167 and 168: 560 ing system 1t would be helpful
- Page 169 and 170: Estuarine and Coastal Management -
- Page 171 and 172: obtained, or shoreline changes-were
- Page 173 and 174: SAV was sighted as well as water co
- Page 175 and 176: canadensis and Zannlchelia palustri
516<br />
There is an urgent and unprecedented need for management policies<br />
that will arrest <strong>the</strong> resulting environmental problems before marine<br />
systems are irreversibly degraded and <strong>the</strong>ir valuable resources<br />
irretrievably lost and multiple dwelling units elbow out<br />
recreational opportunities and natural habitats while asphalt<br />
substitutes for ambiance.<br />
Framework for Managing Entuariw Preservaticn<br />
Protection of <strong>the</strong> nation's estuaries has been identified as a<br />
national priority. Congress has charged <strong>the</strong> Environmental<br />
Protection Agency with <strong>the</strong> responsibilities for restoring water<br />
quality and living resources through improved estuary management.<br />
To carry out <strong>the</strong> Congressional authorization, EPA established <strong>the</strong><br />
national Estuary Program (NEP) within <strong>the</strong> Office of Marine and<br />
Estuarine Protection (OMEP). One national program is implemented<br />
through <strong>the</strong> EPA Regional Offices under <strong>the</strong> guidance of <strong>the</strong> OMEP.<br />
To provide assurance of strong scientific support Congress has<br />
charged <strong>the</strong> <strong>National</strong> Oceanographic Atmospheric Administration<br />
(N.O.A.A.) through <strong>the</strong> <strong>National</strong> Estuarine Management Office to take<br />
responsibility for research into living resources and habitat<br />
protection.<br />
The U.S. Pish and Wildlife Service and <strong>the</strong> Army Corps of Engineers<br />
make up <strong>the</strong> remainder of <strong>the</strong> responsible agencies of <strong>the</strong> federal<br />
government.<br />
Host states bordering our nation's estuaries have established<br />
environmental management structures to deal with coastal and<br />
estuarine systems. For example:<br />
Some states have taken <strong>the</strong> initiative to deal directly with <strong>the</strong><br />
critical land areas within 1000 feet of shore. Towns and cities<br />
bordering coastal areas and bays have recognized <strong>the</strong>ir role as <strong>the</strong><br />
first line of defense against estuarine degradation. Ccrmunity and<br />
municipal officials have <strong>the</strong> direct responsibility for sewage<br />
treatment, land use planning, zoning and agricultural practices.<br />
In some states, officials from towns and cities at <strong>the</strong> headwaters of<br />
rivers and streams have recognized <strong>the</strong>ir role in <strong>the</strong> restoration and<br />
preservation effort and have begun to address <strong>the</strong> problem of<br />
deforestation and land conversion on bays and estuaries many miles<br />
down stream.<br />
This formal institutional structure is held responsible for defining<br />
<strong>the</strong> problem, developing a framework for action, setting goals and<br />
designing mechanises for achieving those goals. Some way trust be<br />
found for <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>se institutions and <strong>the</strong> people who man <strong>the</strong>m to<br />
sustain <strong>the</strong> will and <strong>the</strong> necessary resources for <strong>the</strong> decades<br />
required to achieve water quality and habitat protection goals.