11.02.2013 Views

Full document / COSOC-W-86-002 - the National Sea Grant Library

Full document / COSOC-W-86-002 - the National Sea Grant Library

Full document / COSOC-W-86-002 - the National Sea Grant Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Estuarine and Coastal Management -Tools of<strong>the</strong><br />

Trade. Proceedings of<strong>the</strong> Tenth <strong>National</strong> Conference<br />

of The CoastalSociety. October 12-15.19<strong>86</strong>. New<br />

Orleans. LA, Copyright byThe Coastal Society<br />

1987.<br />

DEVELOPING A TECHNICAL PROGRAM TO SUPPORT<br />

ESTUARINE MANAGEMENT: A COMPARISON OF<br />

THREE NORTHEASTERN ESTUARIES<br />

The Technical Advisory Process<br />

Michael S. Connor<br />

Batteue Ocean Sciences Technology Department<br />

Duxbory.MA 02332<br />

The design of mechanisms to promote effective transmission of outside<br />

scientific advice to governmental decision makers has generated a number of<br />

approaches (Robinson, 1980). Much of <strong>the</strong> emphasis has focused at <strong>the</strong> national<br />

level; hovover technical advisory boards havo become a common feature of<br />

governmental studies at <strong>the</strong> federal, regional, state, and local level. At <strong>the</strong><br />

national level alone, <strong>the</strong>re vere more than 1,300 national advisory boards with<br />

22,000 members in <strong>the</strong> mid-1970s (Spohn, 1983). Despite <strong>the</strong>ir widespread use<br />

at all levels of government, very little is known about what mechanisms<br />

maximize <strong>the</strong> most effective use of non-governmental scientists, nor, in fact,<br />

have any criteria been developed to determine such effectiveness.<br />

The role of scientists Is particularly troublesome because of <strong>the</strong> triad of<br />

roles <strong>the</strong>y serve as (1) arbiters of <strong>the</strong> technical feasibility of a project,<br />

(2) a separate political constituency, and (3) potential contractors for <strong>the</strong><br />

work which needs to be done. Scientists are often asked to review <strong>the</strong><br />

technical morlts of a proposed project, although in polarized situations few<br />

scientists are perceived as unbiased (Reich, 1983). In addition, <strong>the</strong><br />

scientists asked to evaluate a project's technical feasibility nay later be<br />

contracted to perform <strong>the</strong> work. The participation of scientists in <strong>the</strong> "Star<br />

Wars" debate is a recent example of <strong>the</strong>se overlapping roles, where scientists<br />

opposed to <strong>the</strong> political ramifications of <strong>the</strong> project have refused to seek<br />

research funding while characterizing <strong>the</strong> program as technically unfeasible<br />

(Smith, 198S).<br />

503

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!