Immunotherapy for Infectious Diseases
Immunotherapy for Infectious Diseases Immunotherapy for Infectious Diseases
73 Fig. 7. Technologies for stable expression of human monoclonal antibodies. EBV, Epstein-Barr virus; PCR, polymerase chain reaction.
74 Kunert and Katinger persons of any age (17,18). Different preparations of hyperimmune sera are also available against rabies for application after rabies exposure (19,20). Anti-thymocyte globulin is extensively used in the treatment and prophylaxis of rejection episodes in renal transplantations (21). Furthermore, these preparations are used in different bone marrow recipients (22) and non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas (23) to reduce CD3-bearing lymphocytes. Other kinds of hyperimmune sera are the antitoxins and antitoxoids. With digoxin, the antibody Fab fragments are prepared by immunizing sheep with digoxin coupled to serum albumin as an adjuvant. Digoxin-immune Fab is then purified from sheep blood and used in the neutralization of digitalis toxin (24,25). The protein was approved by the FDA in 1986. Problems Concerning Naturally Occurring Antibodies: Non-ADE-Inducing Monoclonal Antibodies Because of their polyclonality, it is expected that antisera have the entire set of effector functions. Polyclonal antisera can prevent viral infections by different means. Binding of antibody to virus-infected cells can trigger phagocytosis or ADCC or can induce lysis via complement activation. However, a major question concerning the general utility of polyclonal human hyperimmune sera was raised by the discovery of antibodydependent enhancement (ADE) in various viral infections through the binding of the Fc to Fc�RI� and Fc�RII� cells (26). Although the exact mechanisms of the ADE phenomenon have not been determined, it is assumed that the virus/antibody complex on the Fc receptor triggers signals that are relevant for increased cell infectivity. It is also hypothesized that the virus/antibody complex is internalized via Fc/receptor interaction and thus promotes increased infectivity. As found with different Flaviviriadeae like dengue, yellow fever, Wesselsbron, West Nile, and tick-borne encephalitis viruses ADE can modify cell susceptibility through virus-reactive antibodies (27,28). Especially in asymptomatic HIV-1 patients, such antibodies with enhancing properties on homologous and heterologous HIV-1 isolates have been found (29), and up to 95% of sera of HIV-infected persons revealed ADE (30). In other studies the phenomenon of ADE could be assigned to distinct monoclonal antibodies (31,32). These findings raise worries both for the establishment of a vaccine against HIV as well as for the therapy of HIV-1 with HIVIG. Alternatively, these risks could be reduced by using monoclonal antibodies as tools for mapping of non-ADE epitopes in vaccine design or by using non-ADE-inducing monoclonal antibodies (or characterized cocktails) for immunotherapy. Monoclonal Antibodies in Therapy Currently many “small synthetic molecules” are synthesized as drugs, which more or less specifically inhibit the activity of targets such as enzymes or block ligand/ receptor-mediated pathways. This category of small-molecule drugs is often highly efficient in the treatment of particular diseases and is relatively cheap to manufacture. However, short half-lives as well as undesired and more or less severe adverse effects are observed. More recently highly specific monoclonal antibodies have been established, which will allow the pursuit of comparable therapeutic strategies with the expectation of increased half-life and reduced toxicity. Some of these antibodies have
- Page 34 and 35: Some Basic Cellular Immunology Prin
- Page 36 and 37: Cellular Immunology Principles 25 i
- Page 38 and 39: Cellular Immunology Principles 27 s
- Page 40 and 41: Cellular Immunology Principles 29 d
- Page 42 and 43: Cellular Immunology Principles 31 f
- Page 44 and 45: Cellular Immunology Principles 33 F
- Page 46 and 47: Cellular Immunology Principles 35 R
- Page 48 and 49: Cellular Immunology Principles 37 1
- Page 50 and 51: INTRODUCTION Immune Defense at Muco
- Page 52 and 53: Immune Defense at Mucosal Surfaces
- Page 54 and 55: Immune Defense at Mucosal Surfaces
- Page 56 and 57: Immune Defense at Mucosal Surfaces
- Page 58 and 59: Immune Defense at Mucosal Surfaces
- Page 60 and 61: Immune Defense at Mucosal Surfaces
- Page 62 and 63: Immune Defense at Mucosal Surfaces
- Page 64 and 65: Immune Defense at Mucosal Surfaces
- Page 66 and 67: Immune Defense at Mucosal Surfaces
- Page 68 and 69: Immune Defense at Mucosal Surfaces
- Page 70 and 71: Immune Defense at Mucosal Surfaces
- Page 72: II Molecular Basis for Immunotherap
- Page 75 and 76: 64 Kunert and Katinger IMMUNOGLOBUL
- Page 77 and 78: 66 Fig. 2. Monomeric, dimeric, and
- Page 79 and 80: 68 Kunert and Katinger Fig. 4. Humo
- Page 81 and 82: 70 Kunert and Katinger remove prote
- Page 83: 72 Kunert and Katinger Fig. 6. Diff
- Page 87 and 88: 76 Kunert and Katinger that so-call
- Page 89 and 90: 78 Kunert and Katinger whereas sele
- Page 91 and 92: 80 Kunert and Katinger Different pr
- Page 93 and 94: 82 Kunert and Katinger HUMAN/MOUSE
- Page 95 and 96: 84 Kunert and Katinger are expresse
- Page 97 and 98: 86 Kunert and Katinger missing meta
- Page 99 and 100: 88 Kunert and Katinger Fig. 8. Sche
- Page 101 and 102: 90 Kunert and Katinger include a se
- Page 103 and 104: 92 Kunert and Katinger 32. Lee S, e
- Page 105 and 106: 94 Kunert and Katinger 72. Abbs IC,
- Page 107 and 108: 96 Kunert and Katinger 117. Wright
- Page 110 and 111: From: Immunotherapy for Infectious
- Page 112 and 113: Dendritic Cells 101 several organis
- Page 114 and 115: Dendritic Cells 103 tion that infec
- Page 116 and 117: Dendritic Cells 105 chaperones such
- Page 118 and 119: Dendritic Cells 107 CD8� CTLs, th
- Page 120 and 121: Dendritic Cells 109 complete tumor
- Page 122 and 123: Dendritic Cells 111 19. Holland SM,
- Page 124 and 125: Dendritic Cells 113 mouse pneumonit
- Page 126 and 127: Dendritic Cells 115 dendritic cells
- Page 128 and 129: INTRODUCTION Cytokines, Cytokine An
- Page 130 and 131: Cytokines, Cytokine Antagonists, an
- Page 132 and 133: Cytokines, Cytokine Antagonists, an
74 Kunert and Katinger<br />
persons of any age (17,18). Different preparations of hyperimmune sera are also available<br />
against rabies <strong>for</strong> application after rabies exposure (19,20). Anti-thymocyte globulin<br />
is extensively used in the treatment and prophylaxis of rejection episodes in renal<br />
transplantations (21). Furthermore, these preparations are used in different bone<br />
marrow recipients (22) and non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas (23) to reduce CD3-bearing<br />
lymphocytes.<br />
Other kinds of hyperimmune sera are the antitoxins and antitoxoids. With digoxin,<br />
the antibody Fab fragments are prepared by immunizing sheep with digoxin coupled<br />
to serum albumin as an adjuvant. Digoxin-immune Fab is then purified from sheep<br />
blood and used in the neutralization of digitalis toxin (24,25). The protein was approved<br />
by the FDA in 1986.<br />
Problems Concerning Naturally Occurring Antibodies:<br />
Non-ADE-Inducing Monoclonal Antibodies<br />
Because of their polyclonality, it is expected that antisera have the entire set of effector<br />
functions. Polyclonal antisera can prevent viral infections by different means. Binding<br />
of antibody to virus-infected cells can trigger phagocytosis or ADCC or can induce<br />
lysis via complement activation. However, a major question concerning the general<br />
utility of polyclonal human hyperimmune sera was raised by the discovery of antibodydependent<br />
enhancement (ADE) in various viral infections through the binding of the<br />
Fc to Fc�RI� and Fc�RII� cells (26). Although the exact mechanisms of the ADE<br />
phenomenon have not been determined, it is assumed that the virus/antibody complex<br />
on the Fc receptor triggers signals that are relevant <strong>for</strong> increased cell infectivity. It is<br />
also hypothesized that the virus/antibody complex is internalized via Fc/receptor interaction<br />
and thus promotes increased infectivity. As found with different Flaviviriadeae<br />
like dengue, yellow fever, Wesselsbron, West Nile, and tick-borne encephalitis viruses<br />
ADE can modify cell susceptibility through virus-reactive antibodies (27,28).<br />
Especially in asymptomatic HIV-1 patients, such antibodies with enhancing properties<br />
on homologous and heterologous HIV-1 isolates have been found (29), and up to<br />
95% of sera of HIV-infected persons revealed ADE (30). In other studies the phenomenon<br />
of ADE could be assigned to distinct monoclonal antibodies (31,32). These findings<br />
raise worries both <strong>for</strong> the establishment of a vaccine against HIV as well as <strong>for</strong><br />
the therapy of HIV-1 with HIVIG. Alternatively, these risks could be reduced by using<br />
monoclonal antibodies as tools <strong>for</strong> mapping of non-ADE epitopes in vaccine design or<br />
by using non-ADE-inducing monoclonal antibodies (or characterized cocktails) <strong>for</strong><br />
immunotherapy.<br />
Monoclonal Antibodies in Therapy<br />
Currently many “small synthetic molecules” are synthesized as drugs, which more<br />
or less specifically inhibit the activity of targets such as enzymes or block ligand/<br />
receptor-mediated pathways. This category of small-molecule drugs is often highly<br />
efficient in the treatment of particular diseases and is relatively cheap to manufacture.<br />
However, short half-lives as well as undesired and more or less severe adverse effects<br />
are observed. More recently highly specific monoclonal antibodies have been established,<br />
which will allow the pursuit of comparable therapeutic strategies with the<br />
expectation of increased half-life and reduced toxicity. Some of these antibodies have