10.02.2013 Views

Immunotherapy for Infectious Diseases

Immunotherapy for Infectious Diseases

Immunotherapy for Infectious Diseases

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Fungal Infections 305<br />

Table 2<br />

Categories of Immunotherapies under Development or in Current Use<br />

Replacement<br />

Granulocyte transfusions<br />

IVIG<br />

Nonspecific augmentative<br />

Granulocyte transfusions from CSF-stimulated donors<br />

G-CSF<br />

GM-CSF<br />

M-CSF<br />

IFN-�<br />

Specific augmentative<br />

Vaccines<br />

Specific antibody<br />

Fungal extract<br />

Transfer factor<br />

Abbreviations: CSF, colony-stimulating factor; G, granulocyte; IFN-�, interferon-�; IVIG, intravenous<br />

immunoglobulin; M, macrophage.<br />

stimulate immune function against specific pathogens by eliciting new immune responses<br />

or augmenting existing responses. The different types of immune therapies described in<br />

this chapter are listed in Table 2. However, the distinctions between the various <strong>for</strong>ms of<br />

immune therapy are blurred by the complexity and redundancy of the immune system. For<br />

example, replacement immune therapies can augment the immune system, whereas specific<br />

immunotherapy can have nonspecific effects. Administration of colony-stimulating<br />

factors (CSFs) to neutropenic patients <strong>for</strong> the purpose of stimulating bone marrow recovery<br />

may also enhance the function of host effector cells, and such therapy has both replacement<br />

and augmentative qualities. Hence, categorization of immune therapies as<br />

replacement, augmentative, specific, and nonspecific is done with the knowledge that these<br />

labels may need revision as we learn more about the complex interrelationships between<br />

the components of the immune system.<br />

At this time there are no immunotherapies <strong>for</strong> fungal infections that are part of standard<br />

antifungal therapeutic protocols. Most, if not all, immunotherapies <strong>for</strong> fungal<br />

infections can be characterized under the label of experimental therapy. Nevertheless,<br />

this is an area of intense interest, and the field is evolving rapidly. For other recent<br />

reviews on the subject of immunotherapy <strong>for</strong> fungal infections see refs. 1–7.<br />

IMMUNOCOMPROMISED HOSTS AND FUNGAL INFECTIONS<br />

When evaluating therapies, it is important to consider two features of fungal infections:<br />

(1) fungal pathogens are highly diverse organisms; and (2) susceptibility to individual<br />

fungal infections usually depends on the type of immune defect present. Fungal<br />

pathogens are free-living organisms that are acquired from either the environment or<br />

the endogenous flora. The mechanisms of pathogenesis differ <strong>for</strong> the various fungal<br />

pathogens. For example, Aspergillus sp. produce powerful hydrolytic enzymes that<br />

destroy tissue, whereas Cryptococcus neo<strong>for</strong>mans cells classically elicit a weak inflammatory<br />

response. Differences in pathogenic strategies used by the different fungal

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!