Immunotherapy for Infectious Diseases
Immunotherapy for Infectious Diseases Immunotherapy for Infectious Diseases
INTRODUCTION From: Immunotherapy for Infectious Diseases Edited by: J. M. Jacobson © Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ 237 13 Gene Therapy for HIV-1 Infection Ralph Dornburg and Roger J. Pomerantz Since the discovery that AIDS is caused by a retrovirus, HIV-1, enormous efforts have been made to develop new drugs that will combat this infectious disease. Although new conventional drugs have been found to block the replication of this virus efficiently, new mutant strains continuously arise, which escape the inhibitory effect of such drugs. Furthermore, since HIV-1 integrates its genome into that of the host cell, dormant viruses persist in infected individuals over long periods. Thus, great efforts are currently being made in many laboratories to develop alternative genetic approaches to inhibit the replication of this virus. With growing insight into the mechanism and regulation of HIV-1 replication, in the past decade, many strategies have been developed and proposed for clinical application to block HIV-1 replication inside the cell. Such strategies use either antiviral RNAs or proteins (for some recent reviews, see refs. 1–4). Antiviral strategies that employ RNAs have the advantage that they are less likely to be immunogenic than protein-based antiviral agents. However, protein-based systems have been engineered using inducible promoters that only become active upon HIV-1 infection. Although such antivirals have been proved to be very effective in vitro, their beneficial effect in vivo is very difficult to evaluate and still remains to be shown. In particular, the long latent period from infection to the onset of AIDS (up to 10 years or longer) makes it very difficult to evaluate the efficacy of a new drug. Another obstacle is the transduction of therapeutic genes into the patient’s immune cells. Although a large variety of gene transfer tools exist, which allow efficient transduction of genes in tissue culture, it becomes more and more evident that ex vivo transduced cells do not survive long in vivo. No efficient gene delivery tools are available at this point that would allow robust delivery to the actual target cell in vivo. This chapter summarizes experimental genetic approaches toward blocking HIV-1 replication and current gene delivery techniques for transducing therapeutic genes into the precise target cells. HIV-1 LIFE-CYCLE AND POTENTIAL TARGETS FOR GENETIC ANTIVIRALS HIV-1 primarily infects and destroys cells of the human immune system, in particular CD4� T-lymphocytes and macrophages. The destruction of such cells leads to a severe immunodeficiency, e.g., the inability to fight other infectious agents or tumor
238 Dornburg and Pomerantz cells (5). Thus, AIDS patients usually die from secondary infections (e.g., tuberculosis, pneumonia) or cancer (e.g., Kaposi’s sarcoma). To prevent the destruction of the cells of the immune system, a diverse array of efforts is now under way to make such cells resistant to HIV-1 infection. This approach has been termed intracellular immunization (6). HIV-1 replicates via a classic retroviral life cycle (Fig. 1). Virus entry is mediated by the binding of the viral envelope protein to a specific receptor, termed CD4, which is expressed on the cell surface of T-lymphocytes and certain monocyte/macrophage populations. However, in contrast to other retroviruses, other receptors are also required for cell entry. Such coreceptors (e.g., CXCR-4 and CCR5) have been found to be chemokine receptors. Efforts are being made to develop genetic antivirals, which interfere with the first step of viral infection (Fig. 2). After entry into the cell, the viral RNA is reverse-transcribed into viral DNA by the viral reverse transcriptase (RT). The resulting preintegration complex is then actively transported across the nuclear membrane. Thus, in contrast to C-type retroviruses, HIV- 1 is capable of infecting quiescent cells. Many attempts are now also under way to endow immune cells with genes that would prevent reverse transcription and/or integration (Fig. 2). Lentiviruses also express a number of critical regulatory genes from multiplyspliced mRNAs. Thus, a series of studies are currently under way to test the potential of genetic antivirals directed not only against the structural core and envelope proteins (e.g., matrix proteins, RT, integrase, protease) but also against some regulatory proteins, which are specific and essential for the life cycle of lentiviruses. HIV-1 contains six regulatory genes, which are involved in the complex pathogenesis. For example, the Tat gene is the major transcriptional transactivator of HIV-1 and is essential for activity of the long terminal repeat (LTR) promoter. The Tat protein stimulates HIV-1 transcription via an RNA intermediate called the transactivation response (TAR) region, which is found just downstream of the 5� LTR. The product of the Rev gene ensures the transport of unspliced viral RNA from the nucleus to the cytoplasm. Tat and Rev are absolutely essential for HIV-1 replication, and therefore became major targets for the development of genetic antivirals. Such antivirals attack the virus after integration into the chromosomes of the host and are aimed at preventing or reducing particle formation and/or release from infected cells (Fig. 2). Other critical accessory proteins include Vpr (which leads to G2 arrest in the cell cycle of infected cells), Nef (which stimulates viral production and activation of infected cells), Vpu (which stimulates viral release), and Vif (which seems to augment viral production in either early or late steps in the viral life cycle. These regulatory proteins may be somewhat less crucial to viral load and replication in comparison with Tat and Rev. Consequently, antiviral agents, which attack these proteins, are less likely to significantly prevent infection and/or the spread of the virus. Potential genetic inhibitors of virus replication should have four features, which overcome the shortcomings of conventional treatments: First, they should be directed against a highly conserved moiety in HIV-1, which is absolutely essential for virus replication, eliminating the chance that new mutant variants may arise that can escape this attack. Second, they must be highly effective and must greatly reduce or, ideally, completely block the production of progeny virus. Third, they must be nontoxic. A
- Page 198 and 199: Active Immunization for HIV Infecti
- Page 200 and 201: Active Immunization for HIV Infecti
- Page 202 and 203: Active Immunization for HIV Infecti
- Page 204 and 205: Active Immunization for HIV Infecti
- Page 206 and 207: Active Immunization for HIV Infecti
- Page 208: Active Immunization for HIV Infecti
- Page 211 and 212: 200 Jacobson changes of gp120 alter
- Page 213 and 214: 202 Jacobson is reduced (54,55). A
- Page 215 and 216: 204 Jacobson Table 2 Potential Prot
- Page 217 and 218: 206 Jacobson from the SIV/17E-Cl-in
- Page 219 and 220: 208 Jacobson Several groups have de
- Page 221 and 222: 210 Jacobson HUMAN STUDIES Polyclon
- Page 223 and 224: 212 Jacobson clinical isolates, whi
- Page 225 and 226: 214 Jacobson 22. Beasley RP, Hwang
- Page 227 and 228: 216 Jacobson 59. Yoshiyama H, Mo H,
- Page 229 and 230: 218 Jacobson 95. Prince AM, Reesink
- Page 231 and 232: 220 Jacobson 133. Stiehm ER, Lamber
- Page 233 and 234: 222 Kilby and Bucy Although clinica
- Page 235 and 236: 224 Kilby and Bucy can infect human
- Page 237 and 238: 226 Kilby and Bucy the proinflammat
- Page 239 and 240: 228 Kilby and Bucy CD3/CD28, and th
- Page 241 and 242: 230 Kilby and Bucy of viral replica
- Page 243 and 244: 232 Kilby and Bucy 21. Cao Y, Qin L
- Page 245 and 246: 234 Kilby and Bucy 64. Pantaleo G,
- Page 247: 236 Kilby and Bucy 101. Clements-Ma
- Page 251 and 252: 240 Dornburg and Pomerantz Fig. 2.
- Page 253 and 254: 242 Dornburg and Pomerantz domains
- Page 255 and 256: 244 Dornburg and Pomerantz GENETIC
- Page 257 and 258: 246 Dornburg and Pomerantz Fig. 5.
- Page 259 and 260: 248 Dornburg and Pomerantz 6. Balti
- Page 262 and 263: From: Immunotherapy for Infectious
- Page 264 and 265: Viral Infections Other than HIV 253
- Page 266 and 267: Viral Infections Other than HIV 255
- Page 268 and 269: Viral Infections Other than HIV 257
- Page 270 and 271: From: Immunotherapy for Infectious
- Page 272 and 273: Virus-Associated Malignancies 261 c
- Page 274 and 275: Virus-Associated Malignancies 263 o
- Page 276 and 277: Virus-Associated Malignancies 265 I
- Page 278 and 279: Virus-Associated Malignancies 267 R
- Page 280 and 281: Virus-Associated Malignancies 269 T
- Page 282 and 283: Virus-Associated Malignancies 271 1
- Page 284 and 285: Virus-Associated Malignancies 273 5
- Page 286 and 287: From: Immunotherapy for Infectious
- Page 288 and 289: Bacterial Infections and Sepsis 277
- Page 290 and 291: Bacterial Infections and Sepsis 279
- Page 292: Bacterial Infections and Sepsis 281
- Page 295 and 296: 284 Wallis and Johnson replication
- Page 297 and 298: 286 Wallis and Johnson Several stud
INTRODUCTION<br />
From: <strong>Immunotherapy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Infectious</strong> <strong>Diseases</strong><br />
Edited by: J. M. Jacobson © Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ<br />
237<br />
13<br />
Gene Therapy <strong>for</strong> HIV-1 Infection<br />
Ralph Dornburg and Roger J. Pomerantz<br />
Since the discovery that AIDS is caused by a retrovirus, HIV-1, enormous ef<strong>for</strong>ts<br />
have been made to develop new drugs that will combat this infectious disease. Although<br />
new conventional drugs have been found to block the replication of this virus efficiently,<br />
new mutant strains continuously arise, which escape the inhibitory effect of<br />
such drugs. Furthermore, since HIV-1 integrates its genome into that of the host cell,<br />
dormant viruses persist in infected individuals over long periods. Thus, great ef<strong>for</strong>ts are<br />
currently being made in many laboratories to develop alternative genetic approaches to<br />
inhibit the replication of this virus. With growing insight into the mechanism and regulation<br />
of HIV-1 replication, in the past decade, many strategies have been developed<br />
and proposed <strong>for</strong> clinical application to block HIV-1 replication inside the cell. Such<br />
strategies use either antiviral RNAs or proteins (<strong>for</strong> some recent reviews, see refs. 1–4).<br />
Antiviral strategies that employ RNAs have the advantage that they are less likely to<br />
be immunogenic than protein-based antiviral agents. However, protein-based systems<br />
have been engineered using inducible promoters that only become active upon HIV-1<br />
infection. Although such antivirals have been proved to be very effective in vitro, their<br />
beneficial effect in vivo is very difficult to evaluate and still remains to be shown. In<br />
particular, the long latent period from infection to the onset of AIDS (up to 10 years<br />
or longer) makes it very difficult to evaluate the efficacy of a new drug.<br />
Another obstacle is the transduction of therapeutic genes into the patient’s immune<br />
cells. Although a large variety of gene transfer tools exist, which allow efficient transduction<br />
of genes in tissue culture, it becomes more and more evident that ex vivo transduced<br />
cells do not survive long in vivo. No efficient gene delivery tools are available at this point<br />
that would allow robust delivery to the actual target cell in vivo. This chapter summarizes<br />
experimental genetic approaches toward blocking HIV-1 replication and current gene<br />
delivery techniques <strong>for</strong> transducing therapeutic genes into the precise target cells.<br />
HIV-1 LIFE-CYCLE AND POTENTIAL<br />
TARGETS FOR GENETIC ANTIVIRALS<br />
HIV-1 primarily infects and destroys cells of the human immune system, in particular<br />
CD4� T-lymphocytes and macrophages. The destruction of such cells leads to a<br />
severe immunodeficiency, e.g., the inability to fight other infectious agents or tumor