Immunotherapy for Infectious Diseases

Immunotherapy for Infectious Diseases Immunotherapy for Infectious Diseases

ibvacunas.com
from ibvacunas.com More from this publisher
10.02.2013 Views

INTRODUCTION From: Immunotherapy for Infectious Diseases Edited by: J. M. Jacobson © Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ 237 13 Gene Therapy for HIV-1 Infection Ralph Dornburg and Roger J. Pomerantz Since the discovery that AIDS is caused by a retrovirus, HIV-1, enormous efforts have been made to develop new drugs that will combat this infectious disease. Although new conventional drugs have been found to block the replication of this virus efficiently, new mutant strains continuously arise, which escape the inhibitory effect of such drugs. Furthermore, since HIV-1 integrates its genome into that of the host cell, dormant viruses persist in infected individuals over long periods. Thus, great efforts are currently being made in many laboratories to develop alternative genetic approaches to inhibit the replication of this virus. With growing insight into the mechanism and regulation of HIV-1 replication, in the past decade, many strategies have been developed and proposed for clinical application to block HIV-1 replication inside the cell. Such strategies use either antiviral RNAs or proteins (for some recent reviews, see refs. 1–4). Antiviral strategies that employ RNAs have the advantage that they are less likely to be immunogenic than protein-based antiviral agents. However, protein-based systems have been engineered using inducible promoters that only become active upon HIV-1 infection. Although such antivirals have been proved to be very effective in vitro, their beneficial effect in vivo is very difficult to evaluate and still remains to be shown. In particular, the long latent period from infection to the onset of AIDS (up to 10 years or longer) makes it very difficult to evaluate the efficacy of a new drug. Another obstacle is the transduction of therapeutic genes into the patient’s immune cells. Although a large variety of gene transfer tools exist, which allow efficient transduction of genes in tissue culture, it becomes more and more evident that ex vivo transduced cells do not survive long in vivo. No efficient gene delivery tools are available at this point that would allow robust delivery to the actual target cell in vivo. This chapter summarizes experimental genetic approaches toward blocking HIV-1 replication and current gene delivery techniques for transducing therapeutic genes into the precise target cells. HIV-1 LIFE-CYCLE AND POTENTIAL TARGETS FOR GENETIC ANTIVIRALS HIV-1 primarily infects and destroys cells of the human immune system, in particular CD4� T-lymphocytes and macrophages. The destruction of such cells leads to a severe immunodeficiency, e.g., the inability to fight other infectious agents or tumor

238 Dornburg and Pomerantz cells (5). Thus, AIDS patients usually die from secondary infections (e.g., tuberculosis, pneumonia) or cancer (e.g., Kaposi’s sarcoma). To prevent the destruction of the cells of the immune system, a diverse array of efforts is now under way to make such cells resistant to HIV-1 infection. This approach has been termed intracellular immunization (6). HIV-1 replicates via a classic retroviral life cycle (Fig. 1). Virus entry is mediated by the binding of the viral envelope protein to a specific receptor, termed CD4, which is expressed on the cell surface of T-lymphocytes and certain monocyte/macrophage populations. However, in contrast to other retroviruses, other receptors are also required for cell entry. Such coreceptors (e.g., CXCR-4 and CCR5) have been found to be chemokine receptors. Efforts are being made to develop genetic antivirals, which interfere with the first step of viral infection (Fig. 2). After entry into the cell, the viral RNA is reverse-transcribed into viral DNA by the viral reverse transcriptase (RT). The resulting preintegration complex is then actively transported across the nuclear membrane. Thus, in contrast to C-type retroviruses, HIV- 1 is capable of infecting quiescent cells. Many attempts are now also under way to endow immune cells with genes that would prevent reverse transcription and/or integration (Fig. 2). Lentiviruses also express a number of critical regulatory genes from multiplyspliced mRNAs. Thus, a series of studies are currently under way to test the potential of genetic antivirals directed not only against the structural core and envelope proteins (e.g., matrix proteins, RT, integrase, protease) but also against some regulatory proteins, which are specific and essential for the life cycle of lentiviruses. HIV-1 contains six regulatory genes, which are involved in the complex pathogenesis. For example, the Tat gene is the major transcriptional transactivator of HIV-1 and is essential for activity of the long terminal repeat (LTR) promoter. The Tat protein stimulates HIV-1 transcription via an RNA intermediate called the transactivation response (TAR) region, which is found just downstream of the 5� LTR. The product of the Rev gene ensures the transport of unspliced viral RNA from the nucleus to the cytoplasm. Tat and Rev are absolutely essential for HIV-1 replication, and therefore became major targets for the development of genetic antivirals. Such antivirals attack the virus after integration into the chromosomes of the host and are aimed at preventing or reducing particle formation and/or release from infected cells (Fig. 2). Other critical accessory proteins include Vpr (which leads to G2 arrest in the cell cycle of infected cells), Nef (which stimulates viral production and activation of infected cells), Vpu (which stimulates viral release), and Vif (which seems to augment viral production in either early or late steps in the viral life cycle. These regulatory proteins may be somewhat less crucial to viral load and replication in comparison with Tat and Rev. Consequently, antiviral agents, which attack these proteins, are less likely to significantly prevent infection and/or the spread of the virus. Potential genetic inhibitors of virus replication should have four features, which overcome the shortcomings of conventional treatments: First, they should be directed against a highly conserved moiety in HIV-1, which is absolutely essential for virus replication, eliminating the chance that new mutant variants may arise that can escape this attack. Second, they must be highly effective and must greatly reduce or, ideally, completely block the production of progeny virus. Third, they must be nontoxic. A

INTRODUCTION<br />

From: <strong>Immunotherapy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Infectious</strong> <strong>Diseases</strong><br />

Edited by: J. M. Jacobson © Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ<br />

237<br />

13<br />

Gene Therapy <strong>for</strong> HIV-1 Infection<br />

Ralph Dornburg and Roger J. Pomerantz<br />

Since the discovery that AIDS is caused by a retrovirus, HIV-1, enormous ef<strong>for</strong>ts<br />

have been made to develop new drugs that will combat this infectious disease. Although<br />

new conventional drugs have been found to block the replication of this virus efficiently,<br />

new mutant strains continuously arise, which escape the inhibitory effect of<br />

such drugs. Furthermore, since HIV-1 integrates its genome into that of the host cell,<br />

dormant viruses persist in infected individuals over long periods. Thus, great ef<strong>for</strong>ts are<br />

currently being made in many laboratories to develop alternative genetic approaches to<br />

inhibit the replication of this virus. With growing insight into the mechanism and regulation<br />

of HIV-1 replication, in the past decade, many strategies have been developed<br />

and proposed <strong>for</strong> clinical application to block HIV-1 replication inside the cell. Such<br />

strategies use either antiviral RNAs or proteins (<strong>for</strong> some recent reviews, see refs. 1–4).<br />

Antiviral strategies that employ RNAs have the advantage that they are less likely to<br />

be immunogenic than protein-based antiviral agents. However, protein-based systems<br />

have been engineered using inducible promoters that only become active upon HIV-1<br />

infection. Although such antivirals have been proved to be very effective in vitro, their<br />

beneficial effect in vivo is very difficult to evaluate and still remains to be shown. In<br />

particular, the long latent period from infection to the onset of AIDS (up to 10 years<br />

or longer) makes it very difficult to evaluate the efficacy of a new drug.<br />

Another obstacle is the transduction of therapeutic genes into the patient’s immune<br />

cells. Although a large variety of gene transfer tools exist, which allow efficient transduction<br />

of genes in tissue culture, it becomes more and more evident that ex vivo transduced<br />

cells do not survive long in vivo. No efficient gene delivery tools are available at this point<br />

that would allow robust delivery to the actual target cell in vivo. This chapter summarizes<br />

experimental genetic approaches toward blocking HIV-1 replication and current gene<br />

delivery techniques <strong>for</strong> transducing therapeutic genes into the precise target cells.<br />

HIV-1 LIFE-CYCLE AND POTENTIAL<br />

TARGETS FOR GENETIC ANTIVIRALS<br />

HIV-1 primarily infects and destroys cells of the human immune system, in particular<br />

CD4� T-lymphocytes and macrophages. The destruction of such cells leads to a<br />

severe immunodeficiency, e.g., the inability to fight other infectious agents or tumor

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!