Immunotherapy for Infectious Diseases

Immunotherapy for Infectious Diseases Immunotherapy for Infectious Diseases

ibvacunas.com
from ibvacunas.com More from this publisher
10.02.2013 Views

Passive Immunotherapy for HIV Infection 209 atrophy of the thymic transplants in the SCID-hu mice was prevented by the prior administration of antibody. It should be noted that in an acute human to mouse xenograft model in which donated human monocytes and lymphocytes are in an activated state, monoclonal antibodies with demonstrated in vitro neutralizing activity against primary isolates failed to provide in vivo protection against infection (120). Since activated cells are more supportive of HIV infection, this animal model is a more difficult one for neutralizing antibodies to demonstrate activity. Postexposure Studies in SCID Mice To study the potential role of antibodies in postexposure protection against HIV infection, the antibodies can be administered at several time points after the hu-PBL-SCID mice are challenged with virus. Anti-V3, anti-CD4-BS, anti-gp41, and other antibodies affect the virus-host cell interaction subsequent to gp120-CD4 binding (121,122). Thus, they might be effective at preventing the establishment of infection even after virus challenge. The anti-V3 BAT123 antibody was found to protect hu-PBL-SCID mice from infection when given up to 4 hours after HIV-1LAI challenge (115). It was 62% effective when given 5 hours after challenge and 33% effective when given 6 hours or more after challenge. Anti-CD4-BS IgGb12 provided complete protection against laboratory-adapted (HIV-1LAI) and primary (HIV-1JR-CSF and HIV-1AD6) isolates when given within 6 hours of HIV-1 challenge and partial protection when given at 8 and 24 hours after challenge (118). When viral breakthrough occurred, both BAT123 and IgGb12 had no effect on subsequent viral burden. By contrast, HIVIG had to be given within 1 hour of viral challenge to be effective (116). The anti-V3 antibody 694/98-D achieved 100% protection when given 15 minutes after HIVLAI challenge and was 50% effective when given 1 hour after challenge (114). The anti-CD4 B4 antibody protected mice for up to 4 hours after challenge with a primary HIV-1 isolate (72). Role of Antibody-Dependent Cellular Cytotoxicity and Complement Aside from potency, monoclonal antibodies may differ in their ability to effect ADCC and complement-mediated antiviral effects. BAT123 has been shown to mediate ADCC (115). Replacing the murine Fc domain of BAT123 with a human IgG1 Fc domain eliminated the postexposure prophylactic effectiveness of this antibody in the hu- PBL-SCID mouse model (123). In addition, giving the mice cobra venom factor to inactivate serum complement activity also interfered with the postexposure prophylactic effect of BAT123 (123). Thus, the complement system is important for the anti-HIV activity of BAT123 and probably other antibodies. On the other hand, providing complement did not change 694/98-D’s activity in providing postexposure prophylaxis (114). Escape Mutation In an important study, HIV-1LAI virus isolated from one hu-PBL-SCID mouse 3 weeks after receiving antibody 694/98-D as preexposure prophylaxis was found to be resistant to neutralization by 694/98-D (114). Sequence analysis of the V3 region of this virus demonstrated amino acid changes in the epitope recognized by 694/98-D and in one amino acid nearby. Thus, mutation leading to escape from neutralization is a risk of therapy with one monoclonal antibody and supports the need for studying combinations of antibodies.

210 Jacobson HUMAN STUDIES Polyclonal Antibody Preparations A number of preliminary clinical studies have been performed to evaluate HIVspecific passive immunization as treatment for HIV infection. In 1988, Jackson et al. (124) reported infusing plasma containing high levels of anti-p24 antibodies into six patients with advanced HIV infection. The infusions resulted in losses of plasma p24 antigen, fewer patients with positive plasma and lymphocyte HIV cultures, a reduction in opportunistic infections, better symptom and Karnofsky performance scores, and gains in weight (124). Karpas et al. (125) gave monthly infusions of anti-HIV hyperimmune plasma to 10 patients with advanced HIV infection. Plasma p24 antigen and HIV DNA were reduced (125). However, the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay used to measure plasma HIV DNA was invalidated in a later study (126). Jacobson et al. (127), in a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial of hyperimmune plasma pools prepared in the same manner as Karpas et al. (126), followed in 63 patients with advanced HIV infection. Plasma donors were asymptomatic HIV-infected individuals who had CD4 cell counts � 400/mm 3 and were p24 antigen-negative. Plasma recipients received either 250 mL of anti-HIV hyperimmune plasma or control non-HIV-infected plasma every 4 weeks. No effects were seen on CD4 lymphocyte counts or plasma and cell HIV culture titers. However, statistically nonsignificant trends toward delayed time to opportunistic infection and time to death were noted. No effects on weight, Karnofsky performance score, or serum �2-microglobulin levels were seen (127). Vittecoq et al. (128) infused single-donor plasma containing high titers of p24 antibody at 2-week intervals into nine subjects with advanced HIV infection (CD4 cell counts �100/mm 3 ). This was a nonblinded, randomized controlled study. HIV p24 antigen became nondetectable in all patients receiving hyperimmune plasma. Fewer opportunistic infections were observed in the treated patients. No effects on CD4 lymphocyte count, weight, or Karnofsky performance score were seen (128). Levy et al. (129) performed a double-blind, randomized, controlled study of anti- HIV hyperimmune plasma in 220 patients with advanced HIV disease. These patients received either 250 or 500 mL of the hyperimmune plasma or albumin once a month for 1 year. The hyperimmune plasma was pooled from HIV-infected donors with high titers of anti-p24 antibodies. No benefit of treatment was seen in the study population as a whole. However, subset analysis of patients with CD4 lymphocyte counts between 50 and 200/mm 3 who received the 500-mL/month dose of hyperimmune plasma showed them to have statistically significant improvements in CD4 cell counts and trends toward longer survival and lower serum HIV p24 antigen levels. No effects on the occurrence of opportunistic infections or serum �2-microglobulin were seen (129). These studies were performed prior to the availability of the current techniques to measure plasma HIV load by RNA levels. Subsequently, Vittecoq et al. (130) performed a double-blind, controlled trial of single-donor hyperimmune plasma versus HIV-negative plasma in 82 patients with CD4 lymphocyte counts �200 cells/mm 3 . Plasma was given in doses of 300 mL every 2 weeks for 1 year. Treatment resulted in delayed occurrence of opportunistic infection. A nonsignificant trend toward improved survival was seen. There was no effect of treatment on CD4 lymphocyte counts (130).

210 Jacobson<br />

HUMAN STUDIES<br />

Polyclonal Antibody Preparations<br />

A number of preliminary clinical studies have been per<strong>for</strong>med to evaluate HIVspecific<br />

passive immunization as treatment <strong>for</strong> HIV infection. In 1988, Jackson et al.<br />

(124) reported infusing plasma containing high levels of anti-p24 antibodies into six<br />

patients with advanced HIV infection. The infusions resulted in losses of plasma p24<br />

antigen, fewer patients with positive plasma and lymphocyte HIV cultures, a reduction<br />

in opportunistic infections, better symptom and Karnofsky per<strong>for</strong>mance scores, and<br />

gains in weight (124).<br />

Karpas et al. (125) gave monthly infusions of anti-HIV hyperimmune plasma to 10<br />

patients with advanced HIV infection. Plasma p24 antigen and HIV DNA were reduced<br />

(125). However, the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay used to measure plasma<br />

HIV DNA was invalidated in a later study (126).<br />

Jacobson et al. (127), in a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial of hyperimmune<br />

plasma pools prepared in the same manner as Karpas et al. (126), followed in 63 patients<br />

with advanced HIV infection. Plasma donors were asymptomatic HIV-infected individuals<br />

who had CD4 cell counts � 400/mm 3 and were p24 antigen-negative. Plasma recipients<br />

received either 250 mL of anti-HIV hyperimmune plasma or control non-HIV-infected<br />

plasma every 4 weeks. No effects were seen on CD4 lymphocyte counts or plasma and<br />

cell HIV culture titers. However, statistically nonsignificant trends toward delayed time to<br />

opportunistic infection and time to death were noted. No effects on weight, Karnofsky per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />

score, or serum �2-microglobulin levels were seen (127).<br />

Vittecoq et al. (128) infused single-donor plasma containing high titers of p24 antibody<br />

at 2-week intervals into nine subjects with advanced HIV infection (CD4 cell<br />

counts �100/mm 3 ). This was a nonblinded, randomized controlled study. HIV p24<br />

antigen became nondetectable in all patients receiving hyperimmune plasma. Fewer<br />

opportunistic infections were observed in the treated patients. No effects on CD4 lymphocyte<br />

count, weight, or Karnofsky per<strong>for</strong>mance score were seen (128).<br />

Levy et al. (129) per<strong>for</strong>med a double-blind, randomized, controlled study of anti-<br />

HIV hyperimmune plasma in 220 patients with advanced HIV disease. These patients<br />

received either 250 or 500 mL of the hyperimmune plasma or albumin once a month<br />

<strong>for</strong> 1 year. The hyperimmune plasma was pooled from HIV-infected donors with high<br />

titers of anti-p24 antibodies. No benefit of treatment was seen in the study population<br />

as a whole. However, subset analysis of patients with CD4 lymphocyte counts between<br />

50 and 200/mm 3 who received the 500-mL/month dose of hyperimmune plasma showed<br />

them to have statistically significant improvements in CD4 cell counts and trends<br />

toward longer survival and lower serum HIV p24 antigen levels. No effects on the<br />

occurrence of opportunistic infections or serum �2-microglobulin were seen (129).<br />

These studies were per<strong>for</strong>med prior to the availability of the current techniques to<br />

measure plasma HIV load by RNA levels. Subsequently, Vittecoq et al. (130) per<strong>for</strong>med<br />

a double-blind, controlled trial of single-donor hyperimmune plasma versus<br />

HIV-negative plasma in 82 patients with CD4 lymphocyte counts �200 cells/mm 3 .<br />

Plasma was given in doses of 300 mL every 2 weeks <strong>for</strong> 1 year. Treatment resulted in<br />

delayed occurrence of opportunistic infection. A nonsignificant trend toward improved<br />

survival was seen. There was no effect of treatment on CD4 lymphocyte counts (130).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!