Immunotherapy for Infectious Diseases

Immunotherapy for Infectious Diseases Immunotherapy for Infectious Diseases

ibvacunas.com
from ibvacunas.com More from this publisher
10.02.2013 Views

Passive Immunotherapy for HIV Infection 207 The anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody B4 was found to protect all three chimpanzees challenged intravenously with a primary HIV-1 isolate and three of four macaques challenged intravenously with SIV mac257 (72). Mascola et al. (105) studied the activity of combinations of antibodies in protecting macaques against intravenous challenge with an SHIV containing the envelope of the primary isolate HIV-89.6. Three of six animals given HIVIG together with the monoclonal antibodies 2F5 and 2G12 were protected from infection; one of three given 2F5 and 2G12 together were protected. The animals that became infected had lower viremias than IVIG-treated controls and maintained near normal CD4 counts. The three monkeys that received 2F5, 2G12, or HIVIG alone, respectively, developed high viremias but had slower falls in their CD4 cell counts and more benign clinical courses than controls (105). Protection was easier to achieve against vaginal challenge with SHIV89.6 (106). Four of five monkeys receiving HIV IG/2F5/2G12, two of five receiving 2F5/2G12, and two of four receiving 2G12 alone were completely protected from infection. Again, the six animals that became infected had lower plasma viral RNA levels and smaller declines in CD4 lymphocyte counts than control animals. Although the number of animals studied was small, and the progesterone-treated monkey model is not completely comparable to the natural human situation, these experiments suggest that antibody may be more protective against mucosal viral exposure than intravenous challenge (106). This suggestion is supported by the finding that neutralizing antibody inhibits HIV infection of dendritic cells and subsequent spread to T-cells (90). Since dendritic cells in the mucosa are likely to be the initial targets of HIV infection, antibody could play an important role in protecting against the initial establishment of infection (90). Antibody protection against mucosal infection was also demonstrated in an SHIVvpu� study in macaques (107). The triple monoclonal antibody combination of F105, 2F5, and 2G12 given 5 days before cesarean section and immediately after completely protected the infants of four pregnant macaques from an oral SHIV challenge. The four adult macaques were also protected from an intravenous SHIV challenge 3 days post partum. Since the monoclonal antibodies used in this experiment were of the IgG1 type, it appears that antibodies of the secretory IgA type are not necessary for mucosal protection from viral infection (107). Preexposure Studies in SCID Mice Severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) mice lack functional T- and B-lymphocytes (108). Human peripheral blood lymphocyte (hu-PBL-SCID) or fetal human thymic or lymph tissue (hu-thy-SCID or SCID-hu) can be engrafted into the peritoneum of these animals (109,110). The intraperitoneal injection of HIV-1 into hu-PBL-SCID mice leads to sustained infection of the human xenograft (111). Antibody given intraperitioneally rapidly distributes into the blood (112). Thus, the hu-PBL-SCID mouse provides a simple, inexpensive animal model to test passive antibody protection strategies. Large numbers of animals can be involved in these studies. On the other hand, the immunocompromised nature of these animals does not mimic the natural human state when humans are exposed to virus. Furthermore, most human infections occur via the intravenous or mucosal route, not intraperitoneally. Nonetheless, with these limitations in mind, several useful observations have been made.

208 Jacobson Several groups have demonstrated the effectiveness of anti-HIV-1 monoclonal antibodies in preventing infection after viral challenges in the hu-PBL-SCD mouse model. A murine monoclonal antibody targeting the principal neutralizing determinant (PND) of the V3 loop of HIV-1 IIIB (BAT123) and its mouse-human chimer (CGP 47 439), given in a dose of 40 mg/kg, completely protected six mice each against subsequent challenge with 10 MIDs of HIV-1 IIIB, a T-cell line (TCLA) strain. Five of the six animals given control murine antibody became infected (112). BAT123 was found to be 100% protective against HIV LAI in doses as low as 1 mg/kg (113). Another monoclonal antibody with neutralizing activity against the V3 loop of HIV-1, 694/98-D, was found to provide 50% preexposure prophylaxis against HIV LAI (a TCLA strain) when given at a dose of 1.32 mg/kg and 100% protection with a dose of 40 mg/kg (114). The higher concentrations required for complete protection against HIV LAI by MAb694/98-D compared with BAT123 may reflect in vitro neutralization data. Fifty percent in vitro neutralization of HIV LAI against PBL target cells was achieved with 0.6 �g/mL 694/98-D but only 0.09 �g/mL BAT123 (113,114), indicating that BAT123 may be more potent than 694/98D against HIV LAI. Studies of BAT123 were useful in correlating in vitro neutralization data with in vivo anti-HIV protective activity. Complete protection of hu-PBL-SCID mice was achieved with a serum concentration of 16 �g/mL of BAT123, close to the 15 �g/mL concentration needed to achieve �99% in vitro neutralization. Only 43% protection was obtained with a BAT123 concentration of 0.96 �g/mL, three times the 90% in vitro neutralization concentration of 0.32 �g/mL (113). These data suggest that nearly 100% in vitro neutralization concentrations of MAbs may be needed to provide complete protection against HIV-1 infection in vivo (113). However, it should be noted that the dose of HIV-1 that humans are exposed to is usually far less than the 10 MID 50s usually used to challenge hu-PBL-SCID mice (115). In any event, these concentrations of MAbs are achievable clinically, and certainly the doses employed are more feasible than the 100 to >1000 mg/kg doses of HIVIG required to protect 50% of hu-PBL-SCID mice from HIV-1 infection (116). It is now known that primary isolates of HIV-1 are not as easily neutralized by antibodies as are TCLA viruses (36,39). For example, BAT123 did not neutralize primary isolates in vitro and failed to protect hu-PBL-SCID mice from infections with primary isolates (113). IgG 1b12, a human monoclonal antibody directed against the CD4 binding site (CD4bs) of gp120, has shown neutralizing activity against �75% of primary HIV-1 isolates (40,48). Previously shown to protect hu-PBL-SCID mice against infection with HIV-1 LAI, this antibody (117), when given in a dose of 50 mg/kg, completely protected hu-PBL-SCID mice from challenge with the primary isolates HIV JR-CSF and HIV AD6 (118). Once again, this dose provided serum concentrations corresponding to levels giving 99% in vitro neutralization. Lower doses gave incomplete protection. Similar results were seen for this antibody against the TCLA strain HIV-1 LAI. Serum concentrations associated with 99% in vitro neutralization, provided by a dose of 10 mg/kg, were required for complete protection of hu-PBL-SCID mice. By contrast, HIVIG showed no effect in protecting hu-PBL-SCID mice in these experiments. Recently, a monoclonal antibody targeting the V3 loop of gp120 was found to protect hu-PBL-SCID mice and Thy/Liv SCID-hu mice from infection with primary isolates against which the antibody had in vitro neutralizing activity (119). HIV-induced

Passive <strong>Immunotherapy</strong> <strong>for</strong> HIV Infection 207<br />

The anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody B4 was found to protect all three chimpanzees<br />

challenged intravenously with a primary HIV-1 isolate and three of four macaques<br />

challenged intravenously with SIV mac257 (72).<br />

Mascola et al. (105) studied the activity of combinations of antibodies in protecting<br />

macaques against intravenous challenge with an SHIV containing the envelope of the<br />

primary isolate HIV-89.6. Three of six animals given HIVIG together with the monoclonal<br />

antibodies 2F5 and 2G12 were protected from infection; one of three given 2F5<br />

and 2G12 together were protected. The animals that became infected had lower viremias<br />

than IVIG-treated controls and maintained near normal CD4 counts. The three monkeys<br />

that received 2F5, 2G12, or HIVIG alone, respectively, developed high viremias<br />

but had slower falls in their CD4 cell counts and more benign clinical courses than controls<br />

(105).<br />

Protection was easier to achieve against vaginal challenge with SHIV89.6 (106).<br />

Four of five monkeys receiving HIV IG/2F5/2G12, two of five receiving 2F5/2G12,<br />

and two of four receiving 2G12 alone were completely protected from infection. Again,<br />

the six animals that became infected had lower plasma viral RNA levels and smaller<br />

declines in CD4 lymphocyte counts than control animals. Although the number of animals<br />

studied was small, and the progesterone-treated monkey model is not completely<br />

comparable to the natural human situation, these experiments suggest that antibody<br />

may be more protective against mucosal viral exposure than intravenous challenge<br />

(106). This suggestion is supported by the finding that neutralizing antibody inhibits<br />

HIV infection of dendritic cells and subsequent spread to T-cells (90). Since dendritic<br />

cells in the mucosa are likely to be the initial targets of HIV infection, antibody could<br />

play an important role in protecting against the initial establishment of infection (90).<br />

Antibody protection against mucosal infection was also demonstrated in an SHIVvpu�<br />

study in macaques (107). The triple monoclonal antibody combination of F105,<br />

2F5, and 2G12 given 5 days be<strong>for</strong>e cesarean section and immediately after completely<br />

protected the infants of four pregnant macaques from an oral SHIV challenge. The four<br />

adult macaques were also protected from an intravenous SHIV challenge 3 days post<br />

partum. Since the monoclonal antibodies used in this experiment were of the IgG1<br />

type, it appears that antibodies of the secretory IgA type are not necessary <strong>for</strong> mucosal<br />

protection from viral infection (107).<br />

Preexposure Studies in SCID Mice<br />

Severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) mice lack functional T- and B-lymphocytes<br />

(108). Human peripheral blood lymphocyte (hu-PBL-SCID) or fetal human thymic or<br />

lymph tissue (hu-thy-SCID or SCID-hu) can be engrafted into the peritoneum of these<br />

animals (109,110). The intraperitoneal injection of HIV-1 into hu-PBL-SCID mice leads<br />

to sustained infection of the human xenograft (111). Antibody given intraperitioneally<br />

rapidly distributes into the blood (112). Thus, the hu-PBL-SCID mouse provides a simple,<br />

inexpensive animal model to test passive antibody protection strategies. Large numbers<br />

of animals can be involved in these studies.<br />

On the other hand, the immunocompromised nature of these animals does not mimic<br />

the natural human state when humans are exposed to virus. Furthermore, most human<br />

infections occur via the intravenous or mucosal route, not intraperitoneally. Nonetheless,<br />

with these limitations in mind, several useful observations have been made.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!