Immunotherapy for Infectious Diseases
Immunotherapy for Infectious Diseases Immunotherapy for Infectious Diseases
Passive Immunotherapy for HIV Infection 207 The anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody B4 was found to protect all three chimpanzees challenged intravenously with a primary HIV-1 isolate and three of four macaques challenged intravenously with SIV mac257 (72). Mascola et al. (105) studied the activity of combinations of antibodies in protecting macaques against intravenous challenge with an SHIV containing the envelope of the primary isolate HIV-89.6. Three of six animals given HIVIG together with the monoclonal antibodies 2F5 and 2G12 were protected from infection; one of three given 2F5 and 2G12 together were protected. The animals that became infected had lower viremias than IVIG-treated controls and maintained near normal CD4 counts. The three monkeys that received 2F5, 2G12, or HIVIG alone, respectively, developed high viremias but had slower falls in their CD4 cell counts and more benign clinical courses than controls (105). Protection was easier to achieve against vaginal challenge with SHIV89.6 (106). Four of five monkeys receiving HIV IG/2F5/2G12, two of five receiving 2F5/2G12, and two of four receiving 2G12 alone were completely protected from infection. Again, the six animals that became infected had lower plasma viral RNA levels and smaller declines in CD4 lymphocyte counts than control animals. Although the number of animals studied was small, and the progesterone-treated monkey model is not completely comparable to the natural human situation, these experiments suggest that antibody may be more protective against mucosal viral exposure than intravenous challenge (106). This suggestion is supported by the finding that neutralizing antibody inhibits HIV infection of dendritic cells and subsequent spread to T-cells (90). Since dendritic cells in the mucosa are likely to be the initial targets of HIV infection, antibody could play an important role in protecting against the initial establishment of infection (90). Antibody protection against mucosal infection was also demonstrated in an SHIVvpu� study in macaques (107). The triple monoclonal antibody combination of F105, 2F5, and 2G12 given 5 days before cesarean section and immediately after completely protected the infants of four pregnant macaques from an oral SHIV challenge. The four adult macaques were also protected from an intravenous SHIV challenge 3 days post partum. Since the monoclonal antibodies used in this experiment were of the IgG1 type, it appears that antibodies of the secretory IgA type are not necessary for mucosal protection from viral infection (107). Preexposure Studies in SCID Mice Severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) mice lack functional T- and B-lymphocytes (108). Human peripheral blood lymphocyte (hu-PBL-SCID) or fetal human thymic or lymph tissue (hu-thy-SCID or SCID-hu) can be engrafted into the peritoneum of these animals (109,110). The intraperitoneal injection of HIV-1 into hu-PBL-SCID mice leads to sustained infection of the human xenograft (111). Antibody given intraperitioneally rapidly distributes into the blood (112). Thus, the hu-PBL-SCID mouse provides a simple, inexpensive animal model to test passive antibody protection strategies. Large numbers of animals can be involved in these studies. On the other hand, the immunocompromised nature of these animals does not mimic the natural human state when humans are exposed to virus. Furthermore, most human infections occur via the intravenous or mucosal route, not intraperitoneally. Nonetheless, with these limitations in mind, several useful observations have been made.
208 Jacobson Several groups have demonstrated the effectiveness of anti-HIV-1 monoclonal antibodies in preventing infection after viral challenges in the hu-PBL-SCD mouse model. A murine monoclonal antibody targeting the principal neutralizing determinant (PND) of the V3 loop of HIV-1 IIIB (BAT123) and its mouse-human chimer (CGP 47 439), given in a dose of 40 mg/kg, completely protected six mice each against subsequent challenge with 10 MIDs of HIV-1 IIIB, a T-cell line (TCLA) strain. Five of the six animals given control murine antibody became infected (112). BAT123 was found to be 100% protective against HIV LAI in doses as low as 1 mg/kg (113). Another monoclonal antibody with neutralizing activity against the V3 loop of HIV-1, 694/98-D, was found to provide 50% preexposure prophylaxis against HIV LAI (a TCLA strain) when given at a dose of 1.32 mg/kg and 100% protection with a dose of 40 mg/kg (114). The higher concentrations required for complete protection against HIV LAI by MAb694/98-D compared with BAT123 may reflect in vitro neutralization data. Fifty percent in vitro neutralization of HIV LAI against PBL target cells was achieved with 0.6 �g/mL 694/98-D but only 0.09 �g/mL BAT123 (113,114), indicating that BAT123 may be more potent than 694/98D against HIV LAI. Studies of BAT123 were useful in correlating in vitro neutralization data with in vivo anti-HIV protective activity. Complete protection of hu-PBL-SCID mice was achieved with a serum concentration of 16 �g/mL of BAT123, close to the 15 �g/mL concentration needed to achieve �99% in vitro neutralization. Only 43% protection was obtained with a BAT123 concentration of 0.96 �g/mL, three times the 90% in vitro neutralization concentration of 0.32 �g/mL (113). These data suggest that nearly 100% in vitro neutralization concentrations of MAbs may be needed to provide complete protection against HIV-1 infection in vivo (113). However, it should be noted that the dose of HIV-1 that humans are exposed to is usually far less than the 10 MID 50s usually used to challenge hu-PBL-SCID mice (115). In any event, these concentrations of MAbs are achievable clinically, and certainly the doses employed are more feasible than the 100 to >1000 mg/kg doses of HIVIG required to protect 50% of hu-PBL-SCID mice from HIV-1 infection (116). It is now known that primary isolates of HIV-1 are not as easily neutralized by antibodies as are TCLA viruses (36,39). For example, BAT123 did not neutralize primary isolates in vitro and failed to protect hu-PBL-SCID mice from infections with primary isolates (113). IgG 1b12, a human monoclonal antibody directed against the CD4 binding site (CD4bs) of gp120, has shown neutralizing activity against �75% of primary HIV-1 isolates (40,48). Previously shown to protect hu-PBL-SCID mice against infection with HIV-1 LAI, this antibody (117), when given in a dose of 50 mg/kg, completely protected hu-PBL-SCID mice from challenge with the primary isolates HIV JR-CSF and HIV AD6 (118). Once again, this dose provided serum concentrations corresponding to levels giving 99% in vitro neutralization. Lower doses gave incomplete protection. Similar results were seen for this antibody against the TCLA strain HIV-1 LAI. Serum concentrations associated with 99% in vitro neutralization, provided by a dose of 10 mg/kg, were required for complete protection of hu-PBL-SCID mice. By contrast, HIVIG showed no effect in protecting hu-PBL-SCID mice in these experiments. Recently, a monoclonal antibody targeting the V3 loop of gp120 was found to protect hu-PBL-SCID mice and Thy/Liv SCID-hu mice from infection with primary isolates against which the antibody had in vitro neutralizing activity (119). HIV-induced
- Page 168 and 169: Immunopathogenesis of HIV Disease 1
- Page 170 and 171: Immunopathogenesis of HIV Disease 1
- Page 172: Immunopathogenesis of HIV Disease 1
- Page 175 and 176: 164 Connick counts ranged from 73 t
- Page 177 and 178: 166 Connick retinitis in an individ
- Page 179 and 180: 168 Connick A novel method of ident
- Page 181 and 182: 170 Connick occurs quite early in i
- Page 183 and 184: 172 Connick 2. Delta Coordinating C
- Page 185 and 186: 174 Connick 39. Hurni MA, Bohlen L,
- Page 187 and 188: 176 Connick 76. Dolan M.J., Clerici
- Page 189 and 190: 178 Connick 114. Komanduri KV, Visw
- Page 192 and 193: From: Immunotherapy for Infectious
- Page 194 and 195: Active Immunization for HIV Infecti
- Page 196 and 197: Active Immunization for HIV Infecti
- Page 198 and 199: Active Immunization for HIV Infecti
- Page 200 and 201: Active Immunization for HIV Infecti
- Page 202 and 203: Active Immunization for HIV Infecti
- Page 204 and 205: Active Immunization for HIV Infecti
- Page 206 and 207: Active Immunization for HIV Infecti
- Page 208: Active Immunization for HIV Infecti
- Page 211 and 212: 200 Jacobson changes of gp120 alter
- Page 213 and 214: 202 Jacobson is reduced (54,55). A
- Page 215 and 216: 204 Jacobson Table 2 Potential Prot
- Page 217: 206 Jacobson from the SIV/17E-Cl-in
- Page 221 and 222: 210 Jacobson HUMAN STUDIES Polyclon
- Page 223 and 224: 212 Jacobson clinical isolates, whi
- Page 225 and 226: 214 Jacobson 22. Beasley RP, Hwang
- Page 227 and 228: 216 Jacobson 59. Yoshiyama H, Mo H,
- Page 229 and 230: 218 Jacobson 95. Prince AM, Reesink
- Page 231 and 232: 220 Jacobson 133. Stiehm ER, Lamber
- Page 233 and 234: 222 Kilby and Bucy Although clinica
- Page 235 and 236: 224 Kilby and Bucy can infect human
- Page 237 and 238: 226 Kilby and Bucy the proinflammat
- Page 239 and 240: 228 Kilby and Bucy CD3/CD28, and th
- Page 241 and 242: 230 Kilby and Bucy of viral replica
- Page 243 and 244: 232 Kilby and Bucy 21. Cao Y, Qin L
- Page 245 and 246: 234 Kilby and Bucy 64. Pantaleo G,
- Page 247 and 248: 236 Kilby and Bucy 101. Clements-Ma
- Page 249 and 250: 238 Dornburg and Pomerantz cells (5
- Page 251 and 252: 240 Dornburg and Pomerantz Fig. 2.
- Page 253 and 254: 242 Dornburg and Pomerantz domains
- Page 255 and 256: 244 Dornburg and Pomerantz GENETIC
- Page 257 and 258: 246 Dornburg and Pomerantz Fig. 5.
- Page 259 and 260: 248 Dornburg and Pomerantz 6. Balti
- Page 262 and 263: From: Immunotherapy for Infectious
- Page 264 and 265: Viral Infections Other than HIV 253
- Page 266 and 267: Viral Infections Other than HIV 255
Passive <strong>Immunotherapy</strong> <strong>for</strong> HIV Infection 207<br />
The anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody B4 was found to protect all three chimpanzees<br />
challenged intravenously with a primary HIV-1 isolate and three of four macaques<br />
challenged intravenously with SIV mac257 (72).<br />
Mascola et al. (105) studied the activity of combinations of antibodies in protecting<br />
macaques against intravenous challenge with an SHIV containing the envelope of the<br />
primary isolate HIV-89.6. Three of six animals given HIVIG together with the monoclonal<br />
antibodies 2F5 and 2G12 were protected from infection; one of three given 2F5<br />
and 2G12 together were protected. The animals that became infected had lower viremias<br />
than IVIG-treated controls and maintained near normal CD4 counts. The three monkeys<br />
that received 2F5, 2G12, or HIVIG alone, respectively, developed high viremias<br />
but had slower falls in their CD4 cell counts and more benign clinical courses than controls<br />
(105).<br />
Protection was easier to achieve against vaginal challenge with SHIV89.6 (106).<br />
Four of five monkeys receiving HIV IG/2F5/2G12, two of five receiving 2F5/2G12,<br />
and two of four receiving 2G12 alone were completely protected from infection. Again,<br />
the six animals that became infected had lower plasma viral RNA levels and smaller<br />
declines in CD4 lymphocyte counts than control animals. Although the number of animals<br />
studied was small, and the progesterone-treated monkey model is not completely<br />
comparable to the natural human situation, these experiments suggest that antibody<br />
may be more protective against mucosal viral exposure than intravenous challenge<br />
(106). This suggestion is supported by the finding that neutralizing antibody inhibits<br />
HIV infection of dendritic cells and subsequent spread to T-cells (90). Since dendritic<br />
cells in the mucosa are likely to be the initial targets of HIV infection, antibody could<br />
play an important role in protecting against the initial establishment of infection (90).<br />
Antibody protection against mucosal infection was also demonstrated in an SHIVvpu�<br />
study in macaques (107). The triple monoclonal antibody combination of F105,<br />
2F5, and 2G12 given 5 days be<strong>for</strong>e cesarean section and immediately after completely<br />
protected the infants of four pregnant macaques from an oral SHIV challenge. The four<br />
adult macaques were also protected from an intravenous SHIV challenge 3 days post<br />
partum. Since the monoclonal antibodies used in this experiment were of the IgG1<br />
type, it appears that antibodies of the secretory IgA type are not necessary <strong>for</strong> mucosal<br />
protection from viral infection (107).<br />
Preexposure Studies in SCID Mice<br />
Severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) mice lack functional T- and B-lymphocytes<br />
(108). Human peripheral blood lymphocyte (hu-PBL-SCID) or fetal human thymic or<br />
lymph tissue (hu-thy-SCID or SCID-hu) can be engrafted into the peritoneum of these<br />
animals (109,110). The intraperitoneal injection of HIV-1 into hu-PBL-SCID mice leads<br />
to sustained infection of the human xenograft (111). Antibody given intraperitioneally<br />
rapidly distributes into the blood (112). Thus, the hu-PBL-SCID mouse provides a simple,<br />
inexpensive animal model to test passive antibody protection strategies. Large numbers<br />
of animals can be involved in these studies.<br />
On the other hand, the immunocompromised nature of these animals does not mimic<br />
the natural human state when humans are exposed to virus. Furthermore, most human<br />
infections occur via the intravenous or mucosal route, not intraperitoneally. Nonetheless,<br />
with these limitations in mind, several useful observations have been made.