Immunotherapy for Infectious Diseases

Immunotherapy for Infectious Diseases Immunotherapy for Infectious Diseases

ibvacunas.com
from ibvacunas.com More from this publisher
10.02.2013 Views

Passive Immunotherapy for HIV Infection 201 Table 1 Targets of Anti-HIV Monoclonal Antibodies CD4 binding site of gp120 V3 loop of gp120 gp41 Discontinuous gp120 epitopes CD4 CCR5 CXCR4 Antibody Combinations Monoclonal antibodies targeting different HIV epitopes can have additive or synergistic neutralizing activity. This was first demonstrated using laboratory-adapted HIV isolates by combining monoclonal antibodies targeting the V3 loop with antibodies against the CD4 binding domain (49–51). Synergy also has been shown using three monoclonal antibody combinations with individual antibody activities against V2, V3, and the CD4 binding domain (52). Li et al. (53) studied 14 different anti-HIV monoclonal antibodies and two hyperimmune polyclonal anti-HIV immunoglobulin (HIVIG) preparations individually and in combination for their neutralizing effects on simian/human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV)-vpu � ,a chimeric virus that expresses the laboratory-adapted HIV-1 IIIB strain envelope glycoproteins on a simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) backbone (53). Alone, the antibodies 2F5, 2G12, and b12 were the most potent. Synergistic or additive effects were detected when two antibodies targeting different epitopes were combined. Two antibody combinations involving b12, 2F5, 2G12, and 694/98D (anti-V3) were most active. Using the monoclonal antibody F105 as an anti-CD4 binding domain antibody, the monoclonal antibody 694/98D to target V3, the antibody 2F5, and the antibody 2G12, SHIV-vpu � was found to be synergistically neutralized by three and four antibody combinations (54). The monoclonal antibodies 2F5 and 2G12 combined with a hyperimmune polyclonal anti-HIVIG were demonstrated to be synergistic at neutralizing clinical HIV isolates (55). The hyperimmune anti-HIVIG was created from the plasma of HIV-infected persons with CD4 lymphocyte counts � 400/�L and high anti-p24 antibody titers (56). The synergistic effects seen in these studies are probably related to their complementary activities at different epitope targets. In addition, antigen-antibody binding involving one antibody may cause conformational changes in the HIV envelope that makes the second or third epitope target more accessible to neutralization by another antibody (46,51,57). The anti-HIV antibodies are considerably less potent than neutralizing antibodies against other viruses. The anti-CD4 binding domain antibodies are as much as 10 4 less effective than antibodies against poliovirus (23). The b12 antibody is 10-fold less potent than the best antibodies against poliovirus and influenza A (23). Thus, by using combinations of antibodies, neutralization of virus is made more efficient, and the doses of antibodies needed to achieve maximum virus inhibition are reduced. In addition, a broader array of clinical HIV isolates is made susceptible to neutralization, and the likelihood of selecting for antibody-resistant mutants

202 Jacobson is reduced (54,55). A single amino acid change in an epitope can result in escape from antibody neutralization (58–60). Given the high rate of mutation of HIV, this is a significant risk. CD4-Immunoglobulin Fusion Compounds Similar to antibody neutralization, the concentrations of recombinant soluble CD4 (rsCD4) required for in vitro inhibition of clinical HIV-1 isolates are 200–2700 times greater than those required for inhibition of laboratory strains (61,62). Intravenous doses of rsCD4 need to achieve serum concentrations associated with 90–95% in vitro inhibition of the particular clinical isolate to have an in vivo antiviral effect, as measured by quantitative plasma viral cultures (63). One CD4-immunoglobulin product, created by the fusion of rsCD4 with the heavy chain of IgG had no detectable antiviral activity in one clinical study (64), but concentrations able to neutralize most clinical isolates may not have been achieved. A CD4-IgG2 fusion protein, with the Fv portions of both heavy and light chains of the IgG2 molecule replaced by the V1 and V2 domains of CD4, has been found to neutralize most clinical HIV-1 isolates, with inhibitory concentration of 90% (IC90) values less than 40 �g/mL for 26 of 28 isolates tested (47). CD4-IgG2 protected 20 of 21 hu-PBL-SCID mice from challenge with the laboratory isolate HIV-1LAI and the clinical isolates HIV-1JR-CSF and HIV-1AD6 (65). Phase I clinical studies of this preparation are under way. Anti-Receptor and Anti-Coreceptor Antibodies An alternate approach for using antibodies to inhibit HIV replication is to create monoclonal antibodies targeting the CD4 receptor and the chemokine CCR5 and CXCR4 coreceptors used by HIV for cell fusion and entry. Anti-CD4 monoclonal antibodies inhibit HIV infection of lymphocytes and macrophages at both CD4-gp120 binding and postbinding steps and block HIV-induced cell-cell fusion and syncytium formation (66–68). A murine monoclonal antibody (mu5A8), subsequently humanized, has been developed against the second domain of CD4 (69,70). Its antiviral activity is synergistic with anti-gp120 antibodies (71). The epitope on the second domain of CD4 targeted by this antibody is not involved in MHC class II-mediated immune functions, and the antibody does not promote clearance of CD4 cells in vivo (69,70). Thus, this potential treatment appears safe and is likely to proceed to clinical trials. The monoclonal antibody B4 also targets the CD4 molecule, and its binding to CD4 is enhanced in the presence of chemokine receptor peptides (72). Hence, its binding to the CD4 receptor on the T-cell surface may be affected by coreceptor interactions (72). It neutralizes against infection with primary HIV-1 isolates (72). Similarly, it is possible to design anti-CCR5 antibodies that interfere with HIV binding but do not inhibit chemokine binding and intracellular signaling (73). HIV-1 and chemokines bind to different sites on CCR5 (73). Monoclonal antibodies targeting the N-terminus region and the second extracellular loop of CCR5 inhibit HIV infection of cells but not chemokine activity (73). Whether antibodies that target CXCR4 safely can be developed has yet to be shown. Antibody-Dependent Cellular Cytotoxicity Another mechanism whereby humoral immunity could affect the course of HIV infection is through ADCC (74,75). This process consists of programming of mononuclear cells to lyse HIV-infected cells bound to HIV-specific antibody. A different mech-

202 Jacobson<br />

is reduced (54,55). A single amino acid change in an epitope can result in escape<br />

from antibody neutralization (58–60). Given the high rate of mutation of HIV, this is<br />

a significant risk.<br />

CD4-Immunoglobulin Fusion Compounds<br />

Similar to antibody neutralization, the concentrations of recombinant soluble CD4<br />

(rsCD4) required <strong>for</strong> in vitro inhibition of clinical HIV-1 isolates are 200–2700 times<br />

greater than those required <strong>for</strong> inhibition of laboratory strains (61,62). Intravenous doses of<br />

rsCD4 need to achieve serum concentrations associated with 90–95% in vitro inhibition of<br />

the particular clinical isolate to have an in vivo antiviral effect, as measured by quantitative<br />

plasma viral cultures (63). One CD4-immunoglobulin product, created by the fusion of<br />

rsCD4 with the heavy chain of IgG had no detectable antiviral activity in one clinical study<br />

(64), but concentrations able to neutralize most clinical isolates may not have been achieved.<br />

A CD4-IgG2 fusion protein, with the Fv portions of both heavy and light chains of the IgG2 molecule replaced by the V1 and V2 domains of CD4, has been found to neutralize most<br />

clinical HIV-1 isolates, with inhibitory concentration of 90% (IC90) values less than 40<br />

�g/mL <strong>for</strong> 26 of 28 isolates tested (47). CD4-IgG2 protected 20 of 21 hu-PBL-SCID mice<br />

from challenge with the laboratory isolate HIV-1LAI and the clinical isolates HIV-1JR-CSF and HIV-1AD6 (65). Phase I clinical studies of this preparation are under way.<br />

Anti-Receptor and Anti-Coreceptor Antibodies<br />

An alternate approach <strong>for</strong> using antibodies to inhibit HIV replication is to create monoclonal<br />

antibodies targeting the CD4 receptor and the chemokine CCR5 and CXCR4 coreceptors<br />

used by HIV <strong>for</strong> cell fusion and entry. Anti-CD4 monoclonal antibodies inhibit HIV<br />

infection of lymphocytes and macrophages at both CD4-gp120 binding and postbinding<br />

steps and block HIV-induced cell-cell fusion and syncytium <strong>for</strong>mation (66–68). A murine<br />

monoclonal antibody (mu5A8), subsequently humanized, has been developed against the<br />

second domain of CD4 (69,70). Its antiviral activity is synergistic with anti-gp120 antibodies<br />

(71). The epitope on the second domain of CD4 targeted by this antibody is not<br />

involved in MHC class II-mediated immune functions, and the antibody does not promote<br />

clearance of CD4 cells in vivo (69,70). Thus, this potential treatment appears safe and is<br />

likely to proceed to clinical trials. The monoclonal antibody B4 also targets the CD4 molecule,<br />

and its binding to CD4 is enhanced in the presence of chemokine receptor peptides<br />

(72). Hence, its binding to the CD4 receptor on the T-cell surface may be affected by coreceptor<br />

interactions (72). It neutralizes against infection with primary HIV-1 isolates (72).<br />

Similarly, it is possible to design anti-CCR5 antibodies that interfere with HIV binding<br />

but do not inhibit chemokine binding and intracellular signaling (73). HIV-1 and<br />

chemokines bind to different sites on CCR5 (73). Monoclonal antibodies targeting the<br />

N-terminus region and the second extracellular loop of CCR5 inhibit HIV infection of<br />

cells but not chemokine activity (73). Whether antibodies that target CXCR4 safely can<br />

be developed has yet to be shown.<br />

Antibody-Dependent Cellular Cytotoxicity<br />

Another mechanism whereby humoral immunity could affect the course of HIV<br />

infection is through ADCC (74,75). This process consists of programming of mononuclear<br />

cells to lyse HIV-infected cells bound to HIV-specific antibody. A different mech-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!