Immunotherapy for Infectious Diseases

Immunotherapy for Infectious Diseases Immunotherapy for Infectious Diseases

ibvacunas.com
from ibvacunas.com More from this publisher
10.02.2013 Views

From: Immunotherapy for Infectious Diseases Edited by: J. M. Jacobson © Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ 3 1 Humoral Immunity Peter L. Nara INTRODUCTION It has been almost 100 years since Emil von Behring and Shibasaburo Kitasato received the first Nobel Prize for the discovery of passive immunotherapy. In 1888 Emile Roux and Alexandre Yersin isolated a soluble toxin from cultures of diphtheria. The bacterium itself is only found in the throat, but its destructive effects are found throughout the body. Clearly, the bacteria must be sending out an invisible factor, most likely chemical in nature, to cause the body-wide destruction. This idea was the hypothesis of Roux and Yersin. They filtered diphtheria cultures to remove the bacteria and then injected the remaining fluid filtrate (which we call the supernatant) into healthy animals. As expected, the animals showed diphtheria lesions but without any obvious presence of bacteria. They then took serum from animals infected with diphtheria and injected it into healthy animals. When these animals were later inoculated with diphtheria, they were found to be resistant to infection. We now know this method of conferring infection resistance as passive immunity. This first demonstration of defense against infection was described as mediated by antitoxin. (1). It was clear to von Behring and Kitasato (2) that the antitoxin was specific only for diphtheria; it did not confer any defense against other forms of infection. We now know that this antitoxin is composed of antibodies produced specifically against the diphtheria microbe. In 1897, Rudolf Kraus first visualized the reaction of antitoxins to bacteria by simply adding serum from infected animals to a culture of the bacteria and seeing a cloudy precipitate develop as the antibodies bound the bacteria together. Other scientists took different approaches and revealed serum-based responses toward bacteria and their products. Initially these serum properties were given a range of different names, such as precipitins, bacteriolysins, and agglutinins. Immunologic research would have to wait until 1930 before these subtly different properties were unified and recognized as a single entity. Long before antibodies were actually isolated and identified in serum, Paul Erlich had put forward his hypothesis for the formation of antibodies. The words antigen and antibody (intentionally loose umbrella terms) were first used in 1900. It was clear to Erlich and others that a specific antigen elicited production of a specific antibody that apparently did not react to other antigens.

4 Nara Erlich introduced a number of ideas that were later to be proved correct. He hypothesized that antibodies were distinct molecular structures with specialized receptor areas. He believed that specialized cells encountered antigens and bound to them via receptors on the cell surface. This binding of antigen then triggered a response and production of antibodies to be released from the cell to attack the antigen. He understood that antigen and antibody would fit together like a “lock and key.” A different key would not fit the same lock and vice versa. However, he did get two important points wrong. First, he suggested that the cells that produced antibody could make any type of antibody. He saw the cell as capable of reading the structure of the antigen bound to its surface and then making an antibody receptor to it in whatever shape was required to bind the antigen. He also suggested that the antigen-antibody interaction took place by chemical bonding rather than physically, like pieces of a jigsaw puzzle. Thus, by 1900, the medical world was aware that the body had a comprehensive defense system against infection based on the production of antibodies. They did not know what these antibodies looked like, and they knew little about their molecular interaction with antigens; however, another major step on the road had been made. We can see that the antibody system of defense was ultimately a development of the ancient Greek system of medicine that believed in imbalances in the body humors. The antibody response later became known as the humoral arm of the immune system. The term humoral (from the Latin word humors) refers to the fluids that pass through the body like the blood plasma and lymph. The blood plasma is the noncellular portion of the blood, and the lymph is the clear fluid that drains via lymph ducts to the lymph glands and finally into the venous circulation. These fluids carry the antibodies, which mediate the humoral immune response (Fig. 1). BASIC STRUCTURE OF ANTIBODIES Antibodies (immunoglobulins, abbreviated Ig) are proteins of molecular weight 150,000–900,000 kD. They are made up of a series of domains of related amino acid sequence, which possess a common secondary and tertiary structure. This conserved structure is frequently found in proteins involved in cell-cell interactions and is especially important in immunology. Some examples of other members of the immunoglobulin supergene family are the T-cell receptor; the adhesion molecules intercellular cell adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1, -2, and -3 and vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM); the coreceptors CD4 and CD8; the costimulatory pairs CD28, CTLA4, B7.1, and B7.2; and all or parts of many other proteins. The proteins utilizing this structure are members of the immunoglobulin supergene family. All antibodies have a similar overall structure, with two light and two heavy chains. These are linked by both covalent (disulphide bridges) and noncovalent forces. One end of the Ig binds to antigens (the Fab portion, so called because it is the fragment of the molecule that is antigen binding); the other end which is crystallizable, and therefore called Fc, is responsible for effector functions (Fig. 2). There are five classes (isotypes) of Ig: IgM, IgG, IgA, IgD, and IgE, plus four subtypes of IgG (IgG1–4) and two subtypes of IgA (IgA1 and IgA2). Light chains exist in two classes, � and �. Each antibody molecule has either � or � light chains, not both. Igs are found in serum and in secretions from mucosal surfaces. They are produced and

From: <strong>Immunotherapy</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Infectious</strong> <strong>Diseases</strong><br />

Edited by: J. M. Jacobson © Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ<br />

3<br />

1<br />

Humoral Immunity<br />

Peter L. Nara<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

It has been almost 100 years since Emil von Behring and Shibasaburo Kitasato<br />

received the first Nobel Prize <strong>for</strong> the discovery of passive immunotherapy. In 1888<br />

Emile Roux and Alexandre Yersin isolated a soluble toxin from cultures of diphtheria.<br />

The bacterium itself is only found in the throat, but its destructive effects are found<br />

throughout the body. Clearly, the bacteria must be sending out an invisible factor, most<br />

likely chemical in nature, to cause the body-wide destruction. This idea was the hypothesis<br />

of Roux and Yersin. They filtered diphtheria cultures to remove the bacteria and<br />

then injected the remaining fluid filtrate (which we call the supernatant) into healthy<br />

animals. As expected, the animals showed diphtheria lesions but without any obvious<br />

presence of bacteria.<br />

They then took serum from animals infected with diphtheria and injected it into<br />

healthy animals. When these animals were later inoculated with diphtheria, they were<br />

found to be resistant to infection. We now know this method of conferring infection<br />

resistance as passive immunity. This first demonstration of defense against infection<br />

was described as mediated by antitoxin. (1). It was clear to von Behring and Kitasato<br />

(2) that the antitoxin was specific only <strong>for</strong> diphtheria; it did not confer any defense<br />

against other <strong>for</strong>ms of infection. We now know that this antitoxin is composed of antibodies<br />

produced specifically against the diphtheria microbe. In 1897, Rudolf Kraus<br />

first visualized the reaction of antitoxins to bacteria by simply adding serum from<br />

infected animals to a culture of the bacteria and seeing a cloudy precipitate develop as<br />

the antibodies bound the bacteria together.<br />

Other scientists took different approaches and revealed serum-based responses<br />

toward bacteria and their products. Initially these serum properties were given a range<br />

of different names, such as precipitins, bacteriolysins, and agglutinins. Immunologic<br />

research would have to wait until 1930 be<strong>for</strong>e these subtly different properties were<br />

unified and recognized as a single entity. Long be<strong>for</strong>e antibodies were actually isolated<br />

and identified in serum, Paul Erlich had put <strong>for</strong>ward his hypothesis <strong>for</strong> the <strong>for</strong>mation<br />

of antibodies. The words antigen and antibody (intentionally loose umbrella terms)<br />

were first used in 1900. It was clear to Erlich and others that a specific antigen elicited<br />

production of a specific antibody that apparently did not react to other antigens.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!