the impact of hiv/aids on the education sector in tanzania
the impact of hiv/aids on the education sector in tanzania the impact of hiv/aids on the education sector in tanzania
Table 2.3 Distribution
2.3 The HIV/AIDS situation in
- Page 1: MoEC Government of
- Page 5: FOREWORD THE COLLABORATIVE ACTION R
- Page 8 and 9: References 43 Appendices 45 1 A lis
- Page 11: LIST OF TABLES 2.1 The global situa
- Page 14 and 15: The education sector is one <strong
- Page 17 and 18: 1.1 Introduction 1. BACKGROUND The
- Page 19 and 20: parliamentarians are supportive in
- Page 21 and 22: HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, long-term f
- Page 23 and 24: 1.6.2 Study samples Structured and
- Page 25 and 26: 2.1 The global picture 2. MAGNITUDE
- Page 27 and 28: cases in Mbeya Region (see Figure 2
- Page 29: Figure 2.1 Cumulative AIDS cases in
- Page 33 and 34: 3. EVOLUTION OF THE HIV/AID INTERVE
- Page 35 and 36: Table 3.1 Education sector HIV/AIDS
- Page 37 and 38: Table 3.2 The evolution of<
- Page 39 and 40: overall implementation, coordinatio
- Page 41 and 42: HIV/AIDS IEC materials for schools
- Page 43 and 44: Uzazi na Malezi Bora Tanzania (UMAT
- Page 45 and 46: Furthermore, <stro
- Page 47 and 48: 4. LEADERSHIP AND ADVOCACY 4.1 Inte
- Page 49 and 50: � failure to use existing radio p
- Page 51 and 52: 5.1 Policy 5. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOM
- Page 53 and 54: shortage of key pe
- Page 55 and 56: REFERENCES Amani, H.K.R. 2003. HIV/
- Page 57: APPENDIX 1 A LIST OF PEOPLE INTERVI
- Page 61: APPENDIX 3 TANZANIA RESEARCH AND RE
Table 2.3 Distributi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> reported AIDS cases by age and sex, Tanzania<br />
2001<br />
Age<br />
group<br />
18<br />
Male Female Unknown Total<br />
No. % No. % No. % No. %<br />
0-4 198 3.2 186 2.4 4 10.0 388 2.7<br />
5-9 116 1.9 101 1.3 6 15.0 223 1.6<br />
10-14 66 1.1 91 1.2 0 0.0 157 1.1<br />
15-19 139 2.2 418 5.4 1 2.5 558 4.0<br />
20-24 479 7.7 1,095 14.0 8 20.0 1,582 11.2<br />
25-29 894 14.3 1,656 21.2 2 5.0 2,552 18.1<br />
30-34 1,247 19.9 1,710 21.9 6 15.0 2,963 21.0<br />
35-39 1,131 18.1 1,135 14.5 4 10.0 2,270 16.1<br />
40-44 809 12.9 662 8.5 3 7.5 1,474 10.4<br />
45-49 479 7.7 346 4.4 2 5.0 827 5.9<br />
50-54 306 4.9 191 2.4 4 10.0 501 3.6<br />
55-59 157 2.5 91 1.2 0 0.0 248 1.8<br />
60-64 123 2.0 59 0.8 0 0.0 182 1.3<br />
65+ 85 1.4 22 0.3 0 0.0 107 0.8<br />
Unknown 32 0.5 48 0.6 0 0.0 80 0.6<br />
Total 6,261 100.0 1 7,811 100.0 40 100.0 14,112 100.0<br />
Source: Tanzania MoH, 2001<br />
However, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re are signs <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> hope that this devastat<strong>in</strong>g epidemic can be brought under<br />
c<strong>on</strong>trol. In countries such as Uganda and South Africa <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> situati<strong>on</strong> does seem to be<br />
improv<strong>in</strong>g. In several regi<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Uganda, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> HIV <strong>in</strong>fecti<strong>on</strong>s appears to be <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
decl<strong>in</strong>e: <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re is a steady drop <strong>in</strong> HIV prevalence am<strong>on</strong>g 15-19 year-old pregnant women<br />
(Rugalema and Khanye, 2002). In South Africa HIV prevalence rates am<strong>on</strong>g pregnant women<br />
under 20 fell from 21 per cent <strong>in</strong> 1998 to 15.4 per cent <strong>in</strong> 2001, although overall growth rates<br />
are still <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g. In Tanzania <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> challenge is how to susta<strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> low prevalence rates <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
some regi<strong>on</strong>s, whilst decreas<strong>in</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> current high prevalence rates <strong>in</strong> o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rs (e.g. Mbeya, Dar<br />
es Salaam and Kilimanjaro). NACP documents <strong>in</strong>dicate that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> pattern <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>in</strong>fecti<strong>on</strong> is also<br />
chang<strong>in</strong>g, as a result <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> greater coverage <strong>in</strong> Voluntary Counsell<strong>in</strong>g and Test<strong>in</strong>g (VCT),<br />
coupled with <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>in</strong>creased use <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> antiretroviral (ARV) <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rapy and higher levels <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>dom<br />
use.<br />
1 If <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> percentages given here are added up, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> total percentage comes to 100.3. However, this is because <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
figures have been rounded to 1 d.p., ra<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r than because <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> any <strong>in</strong>accuracy <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> statistics. For this reas<strong>on</strong>, all <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> total percentages have been given as 100.0.