Serengeti General Management Plan
Serengeti General Management Plan
Serengeti General Management Plan
- TAGS
- serengeti
- www.zgf.de
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Serengeti</strong> National Park <strong>General</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />
agement targets or in certain cases are not addressed by actions, but simply monitored under<br />
Objective 2.<br />
Target 1.1: Human impacts threatening the Migration minimised<br />
The growing human populations and changing land use practices are having an increasing<br />
impact on wildlife migration routes outside the Park. The greatest impact is in the northwest,<br />
where villages directly border the Park boundary, forming a ‘hard edge’ (see Figure C.3 below).<br />
These villages, which are in <strong>Serengeti</strong> and Tarime Districts, have had higher than average<br />
population growth as a result of immigrants drawn to the park edge by opportunities for<br />
hunting, the availability of better agricultural land, and access to a range of other natural resources.<br />
Such ‘hard edge’ areas represent a challenging management issue, as it is in these areas<br />
that people have the greatest adverse impact on the wildlife values of the ecosystem –<br />
through hunting and land-use conversion to agriculture, and also where the ecosystem’s<br />
wildlife imposes the greatest costs on people through, for example, wildlife crop damage.<br />
Resident wildlife both within the Park and in the uncultivated areas immediately to the west is<br />
under substantial hunting pressure, and populations appear to be much reduced. In addition,<br />
there is a substantial offtake of wildlife when the migration passes through or close to these<br />
villages.<br />
Figure C.3: Settlement distribution around <strong>Serengeti</strong> National Park<br />
32