Serengeti General Management Plan
Serengeti General Management Plan
Serengeti General Management Plan
- TAGS
- serengeti
- www.zgf.de
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Serengeti</strong> National Park <strong>General</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />
Context<br />
This <strong>General</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> (GMP) is the third management plan to be written for the<br />
<strong>Serengeti</strong> National Park (SENAPA), and covers the 10-year period from 2006 to 2016.<br />
The earliest SENAPA management plan (1991-1995), provided for the first time in a single<br />
document, details of the policies guiding SENAPA’s management and management objectives<br />
for the Park as a whole as well as for individual SENAPA departments. Task priorities<br />
and schedules were laid out for establishing a comprehensive park-wide zoning scheme as<br />
well as for addressing the management issues facing each department. The main weaknesses<br />
encountered in the implementation of the plan were firstly, that the departmental objectives<br />
and activities were not clearly formulated, structured, nor linked to the overall Park<br />
objectives and secondly, that practical considerations, such as financial constraints, were not<br />
accounted for.<br />
The second SENAPA management plan was the <strong>Management</strong> Zone <strong>Plan</strong> (1996-2000),<br />
which provided a comprehensive coverage of the management issues, with management<br />
objectives grouped by theme, and management actions and prescriptions established for<br />
each zone. However, there was a lack of higher-level objectives to provide an overall framework,<br />
with the result that some of the stated management objectives were unachievable or<br />
beyond the scope of SENAPA management, whilst others were present at inappropriate levels<br />
or missing completely.<br />
The lessons learnt from implementing these previous plans have provided a few key lessons<br />
for developing this current plan. The principal lesson being the importance of using a Logical<br />
Framework Approach for developing an effective and actionable plan; with clearly defined<br />
and distinct objectives at various levels, and with explicit linkages between them. Another<br />
key lesson is that zoning should be a management tool, not a planning tool per se, and that<br />
therefore this GMP should not be primarily organised according to zones.<br />
Function and structure<br />
This GMP is intended to guide and facilitate the management of park resources, the uses<br />
permitted within the area, and the infrastructure development needed to support that management<br />
and use. An important underpinning of the GMP is the establishment of long-term<br />
strategies and management objectives and targets for addressing SENAPA’s management<br />
problems and issues and for achieving a desired future state over the 10-year duration<br />
of the plan. These objectives in turn provide the framework for determining what management<br />
actions need to be implemented, when to take them, and the human and other resource<br />
requirements needed to implement them. These management actions and the specific<br />
activities needed to accomplish them will be re-developed every three years according<br />
to the changing Park management needs.<br />
The SENAPA GMP follows the generic GMP structure established by TANAPA, as described<br />
in the TANAPA Strategic <strong>Plan</strong>ning Process Manual (1995a). However, the SENAPA Core<br />
<strong>Plan</strong>ning Team has made several adjustments to the planning process and plan structure to<br />
take into account lessons learnt on previous TANAPA park planning exercises, and the special<br />
needs of SENAPA. In particular, emphasis has been placed on making the plan more<br />
relevant to the day-to-day management needs of SENAPA park managers. The plan structure,<br />
as illustrated in Figure A.1 below, defines the main sections of the plan. Below are described<br />
some key aspects of the plan structure adopted for the <strong>Serengeti</strong> GMP.<br />
2