Serengeti General Management Plan

Table H.3: Community Outreach Programme Monitoring Plan
Management
Target
Potential impacts
(Positive and
Negative)
Indicator
H. Plan Monitoring
Source of
Information
Objective 1: Neighbouring community and local government support for conservation
strengthened
1.1: Park-
Increased community Incidences of poach- Protection Departcommunitycoop-
awareness of SENAPA ing within SENAPA ment records
eration,commu- rules and regulations
nication and conflict
resolution
mechanisms enhanced
Reduced conflict between
SENAPA and
surrounding communities
Incidences of Parkcommunity
conflict
Outreach Department
records
Knowledge, attitudes
and practices
surveys (c.f. Action
1.1.2)
Park outreach activities Community contribu- Outreach Depart-
are better targeted to tions to park outment records
community priority reach activities (i.e.
needs and aspirations labour or resources)
1.2: Community Increased value and SENAPA SCIP con- Park accounts
benefits from importance of
tributions
SENAPA enhanced
and costs
reduced
SENAPA to Parkadjacent
communities
Income derived from
economic activities
linking communities
Community based
organisations/ Outreach
Department
to SENAPA
records
Employment of local Park accounts and
people by Park Outreach Depart-
stakeholders ment records
Ranking of commu- Knowledge, attinity
value placed on tudes and practices
SENAPA against surveys (c.f. Action
other community resources
1.1.2)
Reduced costs of wild- Incidents of human- Outreach Departlife
to Park-adjacent wildlife conflicts in ment records (c.f.
communities
communities adjacent
to the Park
Action 1.2.3)
Increased immigration Trends in population Direct observation
into areas surrounding growth and immigra- and District records
SENAPA
tion in Park adjacent
areas
Benefits from IGAs are Number of recipients Community based
unfairly captured by and beneficiaries of organisations/ Out-
wealthy/ powerful schemes
reach Department
community members
records
SENAPA’s high quality Visitor satisfaction Visitor use and sat-
tourism product de- and feedback isfaction surveys
graded by inappropri-
(c.f. Tourism Manate
initiatives or activiagementProtiesgramme
Action
4.1.3)
155