Pdf version (3.2 MB) - Kesko
Pdf version (3.2 MB) - Kesko
Pdf version (3.2 MB) - Kesko
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
INDEpENDENT assURaNCE REPORT<br />
(Translation from the Finnish Original)<br />
INDEpENDENT assuRaNCE<br />
REPORT<br />
TO THE MANAGEMENT OF KESKO<br />
CORPORATION<br />
We have been engaged by the Management<br />
of <strong>Kesko</strong> Corporation to perform a limited<br />
assurance engagement on the information<br />
on economic, social and environmental<br />
responsibility for the reporting period of<br />
January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011 disclosed<br />
in <strong>Kesko</strong> Corporation’s Corporate<br />
Responsibility Report 2011 (hereinafter “Corporate<br />
Responsibility information”).<br />
MANAGEMENT’S RESPONSIBILITy<br />
The Management of <strong>Kesko</strong> Corporation is<br />
responsible for preparing the Corporate<br />
Responsibility information according to the<br />
Reporting criteria as set out in <strong>Kesko</strong> Corporation’s<br />
corporate responsibility reporting<br />
instructions, the Sustainability Reporting<br />
Guidelines of the Global Reporting Initiative<br />
(<strong>version</strong> 3.0), as well as AA1000 Accountability<br />
Principles Standard 2008 issued by<br />
AccountAbility.<br />
PRACTITIONER’S RESPONSIBILITy<br />
Our responsibility is to express a conclusion<br />
on the Corporate Responsibility information<br />
based on our work performed. Our assurance<br />
report has been made in accordance<br />
with the terms of our engagement. We do<br />
not accept, or assume responsibility to anyone<br />
else, except to <strong>Kesko</strong> Corporation for our<br />
work, for this report, or for the conclusions<br />
that we have reached.<br />
We conducted our work in accordance<br />
with the International Standard on Assurance<br />
Engagements (ISAE) 3000 ‘Assurance<br />
engagements other than audits or reviews<br />
of historical financial information’. This<br />
Standard requires that we comply with<br />
ethical requirements and plan and perform<br />
the assurance engagement to obtain limited<br />
assurance whether any matters come to our<br />
attention that cause us to believe that the<br />
Corporate Responsibility information has<br />
92<br />
<strong>Kesko</strong> Corporate Responsibility Report 2011<br />
not been prepared, in all material respects,<br />
in accordance with the Reporting criteria.<br />
In addition, we have conducted our work<br />
in accordance with the AA1000 Assurance<br />
Standard 2008. For conducting a Type 2<br />
assurance engagement as agreed with <strong>Kesko</strong><br />
Corporation the AA1000 Assurance Standard<br />
2008 requires planning and performing of<br />
the assurance engagement to obtain limited<br />
assurance on whether any matters come to<br />
our attention that cause us to believe that<br />
<strong>Kesko</strong> Corporation does not adhere, in all<br />
material respects, to the AA1000 Accountability<br />
Principles (inclusivity, materiality<br />
and responsiveness) and that the Corporate<br />
Responsibility information is not reliable, in<br />
all material respects, based on the Reporting<br />
criteria.<br />
In a limited assurance engagement the<br />
evidence-gathering procedures are more<br />
limited than for a reasonable assurance<br />
engagement, and therefore less assurance<br />
is obtained than in a reasonable assurance<br />
engagement. An assurance engagement<br />
involves performing procedures to obtain<br />
evidence about the amounts and other<br />
disclosures in the Corporate Responsibility<br />
information. The procedures selected<br />
depend on the practitioner’s judgement,<br />
including an assessment of the risks of<br />
material misstatement of the Corporate<br />
Responsibility information. Our work consisted<br />
of, amongst others, the following<br />
procedures:<br />
■ Interviewing senior management of<br />
<strong>Kesko</strong> Corporation.<br />
■ Interviewing relevant employees from<br />
various organisational levels of <strong>Kesko</strong><br />
Corporation with regards to stakeholder<br />
expectations towards <strong>Kesko</strong> Corporation,<br />
the meeting of those expectations<br />
as well as stakeholder engagement.<br />
■ Assessing stakeholder engagement and<br />
responsiveness based on <strong>Kesko</strong> Corporation’s<br />
documentation and internal communication.<br />
■ Assessing <strong>Kesko</strong> Corporation’s defined<br />
material corporate responsibility<br />
aspects as well as assessing Corporate<br />
Responsibility information based on<br />
these aspects.<br />
■ Performing a media analysis and an<br />
internet search for references to <strong>Kesko</strong><br />
Corporation during the reporting<br />
period.<br />
■ Interviewing persons responsible for<br />
the collection and reporting of Corporate<br />
Responsibility information at group<br />
level as well as at site level in Russia.<br />
■ Assessing the systems and practices<br />
used for the collection and consolidation<br />
of quantitative information.<br />
■ Testing the accuracy of the information<br />
from original documents and systems<br />
on a sample basis.<br />
■ Testing the consolidation of information<br />
and performing recalculations on<br />
a sample basis.<br />
CONCLUSION<br />
Based on our limited assurance engagement<br />
nothing has come to our attention that<br />
causes us to believe that <strong>Kesko</strong> Corporation<br />
does not adhere, in all material respects, to<br />
the AA1000 Accountability Principles.<br />
Furthermore nothing has come to our<br />
attention that causes us to believe that<br />
<strong>Kesko</strong> Corporation’s Corporate Responsibility<br />
information has not been prepared,<br />
in all material respects, in accordance with<br />
the Reporting criteria, or that the Corporate<br />
Responsibility information is not reliable,<br />
in all material respects, based on the reporting<br />
criteria.<br />
Our assurance report should be read in<br />
conjunction with the inherent limitations<br />
of accuracy and completeness for Corporate<br />
Responsibility information. This independent<br />
assurance report should not be used for<br />
interpreting <strong>Kesko</strong> Corporation’s performance<br />
in relation to its corporate responsibility<br />
principles.