Pdf version (3.2 MB) - Kesko

GRI GUIDELINES KESKO'S REPORT
Code GRI content Included Page Further information
4.5 Linkage between compensation for members of the Board and
the management, and the organisation's corporate
responsibility performance
4.6 Processes in place for the Board to ensure conflicts of interest
are avoided
4.7 Qualifications and expertise of the Board members for
strategic management and corporate responsibility
4.8 Mission, values, codes of conduct and principles, and the
status of their implementation
4.9 Procedures of the Board for overseeing the organisation's
management of economic, environmental and social
performance, including risk management
51, 81, 83 Presented in Kesko's Annual Report 2011,
pages 49–51.
51 Kesko complies with the Finnish Corporate
Governance Code for listed companies.
Presented in Kesko's Annual Report 2011,
pages 46–49.
51 Presented in Kesko's Annual Report 2011,
pages 47–49 and 55–57.
50, 54
51–53 Presented in Kesko's Annual Report 2011,
page 47.
4.10 Processes for evaluating the Board's own performance 51
4.11 Explanation of how the precautionary principle is addressed 48–49, 51–53
4.12 Externally developed economic, environmental and social
initiatives to which the organisation endorses
54
4.13 Memberships in associations and advocacy organisations 14–15 www.kesko.fi/responsibility
4.14 Stakeholder groups engaged by the organisation 53–54
4.15 Basis for identification and selection of stakeholders 53–54
4.16 Approaches to stakeholder engagement 53–54
4.17 Key topics and concerns raised through stakeholder
15, 53–54, 83,
engagement
89
5. MANAGEMENT APPROACH AND PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
gRI INdEX
ECONOMIC REspONsIbIlITy
MANAGEMENT APPROACH TO ECONOMIC RESPONSIBILITy 54–59 x
Economic performance indicators
EC1* Direct economic value generated and distributed 65–66
EC2* Financial implications and other risks and opportunities for the
organisation's activitiesdue to climate change
67–68 x
EC3* Coverage of the organisation's defined benefit plan
obligations
69
EC4* Financial assistance received from government 69 No assistance in 2011.
EC5 Standard entry level wages compared to local minimum wages
Finland, Sweden and Norway have collective
at organisation's significant locations of operations
agreements, in other countries at least
statutory minimum wages. The ratio
between wages not available.
EC6* Spending on locally-based suppliers 14, 58, 69–70
EC7* Procedures for local hiring 15, 70 x
EC8* Infrastructure investments and services provided for public
benefit
70
EC9 Significant indirect economic impacts, including the extent of
impacts
44–45, 70
ENvIRONMENTal REspONsIbIlITy
MANAGEMENT APPROACH TO ENvIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITy 54–59 x
Environmental performance indicators
EN1* Materials used 71 Packaging materials supplied to the market.
No information available from countries
outside Finland.
x
EN2* Materials used that are recycled input materials 71, 78 Recycling of packaging plastic used in
transportation in reported.
EN3* Direct energy consumption 71–73 x
EN4* Indirect energy consumption 71–73 x
EN5 Energy saved due to conservation and efficiency
improvements
24–26, 73–74 Energy savings achieved not reported. x
EN6 Energy-efficient or renewable energy-based products and
services
24–29, 74 Energy savings achieved not reported. x
EN7 Initiatives to reduce indirect energy consumption and
reductions achieved
24–25, 74 Energy savings achieved not reported. x
Global
Compact
Kesko Corporate Responsibility Report 2011 61