09.02.2013 Views

growers@sgcotton.com.au Roger Tomkins - Greenmount Press

growers@sgcotton.com.au Roger Tomkins - Greenmount Press

growers@sgcotton.com.au Roger Tomkins - Greenmount Press

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Evaluation of insecticides for<br />

controlling pale cotton stainer bug<br />

■ Moazzem Khan and Kristy Byers, DAFF Queensland<br />

WITH the increased adoption of Bollgard II cotton in<br />

recent years, higher levels of pale cotton stainer (PCS)<br />

infestations have been reported from different areas.<br />

PCS c<strong>au</strong>se damage to bolls by inserting their long proboscis<br />

to feed on developing and mature seeds. This feeding activity<br />

c<strong>au</strong>ses black spots on the boll, warty growths inside the boll wall<br />

and brown coloured lint. Feeding on seeds results in tight lock,<br />

preventing the lint from fluffing out as the boll opens.<br />

In Australia there are no insecticides registered for the control<br />

of PCS and they are often incidentally controlled by broadspectrum<br />

insecticides such as synthetic pyrethroids, carbamates<br />

and organophosphates that target other pests. As an occasional<br />

pest, PCS received very little attention with regard to insecticide<br />

evaluation. To date, only one trial has been conducted to identify<br />

effective insecticides for PCS (see The Australian Cottongrower<br />

29(2) 2008, pages 41–42). But it is essential to identify which<br />

insecticides are effective against this pest whilst also <strong>com</strong>patible<br />

with existing IPM.<br />

In cotton, PCS infestation occurs late in the season when large<br />

numbers of whitefly and aphids are also <strong>com</strong>mon. Therefore<br />

insecticides that are effective against PCS, as well as whitefly<br />

and aphids are highly sought after. Pegasus is re<strong>com</strong>mended for<br />

both whitefly and aphids (see Cotton Pest Management Guide<br />

2011–12) and was therefore used in this trial to test its efficacy<br />

against PCS.<br />

The broad aim of this study was to identify insecticides that<br />

were effective against PCS.<br />

TABLE 1: Insecticides used in the trial<br />

Treatment Formulation (g/L) Rate (mL/ha)<br />

Pegasus 400 Diafenthiuron 500 SC 400<br />

Pegasus 800 Diafenthiuron 500 SC 800<br />

Pegasus 400+salt Diafenthiuron 500 SC 400 + 10 g/L of<br />

+ NaCl<br />

water<br />

Shield 125 Clothianidin 200 SC 125<br />

Shield 250 Clothianidin 200 SC 250<br />

Shield 125+salt Clothianidin 200 SC + 125 + 10 g/L of<br />

NaCl<br />

water<br />

Danadim 300 Dimethoate 400 EC 300<br />

Danadim 500 Dimethoate 400 EC 500<br />

Danadim 300+salt Dimethoate 400 EC + 300 + 10 g/L of<br />

NaCl<br />

water<br />

Control Untreated —<br />

Trial<br />

The trial was conducted at the late boll stage of Bollgard II<br />

cotton (variety Sicot 71BRF) at the Kingaroy Research Station. The<br />

trial <strong>com</strong>prised 10 treatments, each with three replications in a<br />

randomised block design. Treatment details are given in Table 1.<br />

Trial plots were five rows wide by 15 metres long. There was a<br />

buffer row between each replication to facilitate spray equipment<br />

and to minimise insecticide drift between plots. The insecticides<br />

FIGuRE 1: Per cent corrected mortality to PCS for different treatments trialled in Bollgard II cotton<br />

August–September 2012 The Australian Cottongrower — 55

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!