growers@sgcotton.com.au Roger Tomkins - Greenmount Press
growers@sgcotton.com.au Roger Tomkins - Greenmount Press
growers@sgcotton.com.au Roger Tomkins - Greenmount Press
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Germinating<br />
ideas<br />
By CSD Extension and Development<br />
Team<br />
IN this edition we address the question of what to do when<br />
cotton prices are lower than expected. Over the past six<br />
months there has been a correction in the cotton price, from<br />
the highs of last season ($1000 per bale) to the lows of mid May<br />
at $350 per bale.<br />
This has a number of implications for this year’s crop. Around<br />
35 to 40 per cent of the new season crop has been sold at prices<br />
between $470 and $550 per bale. This has meant that overall<br />
irrigation area should be similar to last season’s record hectares.<br />
Having water in all the major storages has allowed growers to<br />
forward sell bales not just for the new season crop but two to<br />
three years out.<br />
The major issue lies with dryland acreage which could be<br />
lower. Many dryland growers do not forward sell their crop for<br />
two major reasons. One, they must have planting moisture to get<br />
the crop planted. So many will wait until the crop is in the ground<br />
and sell bales based on what contracts are available from the<br />
merchants. Secondly, as the cotton price falls, other crops may<br />
be<strong>com</strong>e more attractive for dryland growers.<br />
The question of soil moisture at planting is an important one<br />
but even more importantly is not to lock yourself out of the<br />
opportunity to plant cotton by placing herbicides down that are<br />
not <strong>com</strong>patible with cotton. Price over time fluctuates greatly and<br />
can move quite dramatically as we have seen over the past year.<br />
Keeping your options open allows you to move in or out of a<br />
cropping option quite late in the cropping window.<br />
Other things to look at are the long term performance of<br />
dryland cotton over other <strong>com</strong>modities. We know that since the<br />
introduction of Bollgard II and RRFlex technology that cotton<br />
FIGuRE 1: Rainfall use efficiency over time<br />
calculated as bales/mm of summer rain – each<br />
point represents the average rainfall use<br />
efficiency for all the regions<br />
has been made a lot simpler which has allowed growers to<br />
concentrate on other management implications throughout the<br />
season which has lifted yields. Farmers have been able to adopt<br />
dryland systems incorporating stubble retention, minimum till<br />
and wider row configurations that have helped maintained fibre<br />
quality and helped with yield consistency over time.<br />
Of course yield in dryland cotton is dictated by rainfall. CSIRO<br />
has shown over 15 years that variety yield increases are tracking<br />
irrigated yield increases at around 0.1 bale per hectare per year.<br />
This work was conducted by looking at the specific rainfall for<br />
the 15 years and <strong>com</strong>paring that to variety performance to work<br />
out what gain had been made from breeding. The result can be<br />
seen in Figure 1 which shows long term variety yield increase as<br />
portrayed in bales per mm.<br />
Further, variety breeding and adaption to dryland production<br />
has meant that fibre quality has improved. A good example of<br />
this is with the CSD award handed out for the best fibre quality<br />
in a trial, known as the Dr Norm Thompson Shield. This year is a<br />
close <strong>com</strong>petition as seen in Table 1. Interestingly, these growers<br />
are not irrigators – they are all dryland growers (still waiting on<br />
final results).<br />
The improvement in fibre quality has meant that growers can<br />
be confident that even in hot dry years their fibre length will hold<br />
up. Furthermore, growers, due to improved fibre length varieties,<br />
have been able to reduce the width of the skip row, particularly in<br />
regions that have reasonable seasonal rainfall, giving them better<br />
overall yield potential.<br />
Similarly, if we look at yields over the past few years there<br />
have been outstanding results in dryland which shows the vast<br />
improvement over varieties that were around a decade ago.<br />
This is evident when we look at the contenders for the CSD<br />
Alan Brimble<strong>com</strong>be Shield, which is awarded every year for<br />
outstanding results in a CSD dryland variety trial.<br />
Yields over the past three years have been outstanding in<br />
dryland and this has mainly been on the back of the performance<br />
TABLE 1: Candidates for the Dr Norm Thompson<br />
Shield for best fibre quality in a CSD trial<br />
Grower Variety Length Strength Micronaire<br />
Ian Gourley Sicala 1.31 (42) 33.8 4.2<br />
Narrabri, NSW 340BRF<br />
Ben Coulton Sicala 1.30 (42) 34.3 4.4<br />
North Star, Qld 340BRF<br />
Andrew Gill Sicala 1.32 (42) 33.8 3.7<br />
Narromine, NSW 340BRF<br />
Angus McClymont<br />
Goondiwindi, Qld<br />
Sicala<br />
340BRF<br />
1.29 (41) 33.2 3.9<br />
August–September 2012 The Australian Cottongrower — 53