09.02.2013 Views

growers@sgcotton.com.au Roger Tomkins - Greenmount Press

growers@sgcotton.com.au Roger Tomkins - Greenmount Press

growers@sgcotton.com.au Roger Tomkins - Greenmount Press

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Germinating<br />

ideas<br />

By CSD Extension and Development<br />

Team<br />

IN this edition we address the question of what to do when<br />

cotton prices are lower than expected. Over the past six<br />

months there has been a correction in the cotton price, from<br />

the highs of last season ($1000 per bale) to the lows of mid May<br />

at $350 per bale.<br />

This has a number of implications for this year’s crop. Around<br />

35 to 40 per cent of the new season crop has been sold at prices<br />

between $470 and $550 per bale. This has meant that overall<br />

irrigation area should be similar to last season’s record hectares.<br />

Having water in all the major storages has allowed growers to<br />

forward sell bales not just for the new season crop but two to<br />

three years out.<br />

The major issue lies with dryland acreage which could be<br />

lower. Many dryland growers do not forward sell their crop for<br />

two major reasons. One, they must have planting moisture to get<br />

the crop planted. So many will wait until the crop is in the ground<br />

and sell bales based on what contracts are available from the<br />

merchants. Secondly, as the cotton price falls, other crops may<br />

be<strong>com</strong>e more attractive for dryland growers.<br />

The question of soil moisture at planting is an important one<br />

but even more importantly is not to lock yourself out of the<br />

opportunity to plant cotton by placing herbicides down that are<br />

not <strong>com</strong>patible with cotton. Price over time fluctuates greatly and<br />

can move quite dramatically as we have seen over the past year.<br />

Keeping your options open allows you to move in or out of a<br />

cropping option quite late in the cropping window.<br />

Other things to look at are the long term performance of<br />

dryland cotton over other <strong>com</strong>modities. We know that since the<br />

introduction of Bollgard II and RRFlex technology that cotton<br />

FIGuRE 1: Rainfall use efficiency over time<br />

calculated as bales/mm of summer rain – each<br />

point represents the average rainfall use<br />

efficiency for all the regions<br />

has been made a lot simpler which has allowed growers to<br />

concentrate on other management implications throughout the<br />

season which has lifted yields. Farmers have been able to adopt<br />

dryland systems incorporating stubble retention, minimum till<br />

and wider row configurations that have helped maintained fibre<br />

quality and helped with yield consistency over time.<br />

Of course yield in dryland cotton is dictated by rainfall. CSIRO<br />

has shown over 15 years that variety yield increases are tracking<br />

irrigated yield increases at around 0.1 bale per hectare per year.<br />

This work was conducted by looking at the specific rainfall for<br />

the 15 years and <strong>com</strong>paring that to variety performance to work<br />

out what gain had been made from breeding. The result can be<br />

seen in Figure 1 which shows long term variety yield increase as<br />

portrayed in bales per mm.<br />

Further, variety breeding and adaption to dryland production<br />

has meant that fibre quality has improved. A good example of<br />

this is with the CSD award handed out for the best fibre quality<br />

in a trial, known as the Dr Norm Thompson Shield. This year is a<br />

close <strong>com</strong>petition as seen in Table 1. Interestingly, these growers<br />

are not irrigators – they are all dryland growers (still waiting on<br />

final results).<br />

The improvement in fibre quality has meant that growers can<br />

be confident that even in hot dry years their fibre length will hold<br />

up. Furthermore, growers, due to improved fibre length varieties,<br />

have been able to reduce the width of the skip row, particularly in<br />

regions that have reasonable seasonal rainfall, giving them better<br />

overall yield potential.<br />

Similarly, if we look at yields over the past few years there<br />

have been outstanding results in dryland which shows the vast<br />

improvement over varieties that were around a decade ago.<br />

This is evident when we look at the contenders for the CSD<br />

Alan Brimble<strong>com</strong>be Shield, which is awarded every year for<br />

outstanding results in a CSD dryland variety trial.<br />

Yields over the past three years have been outstanding in<br />

dryland and this has mainly been on the back of the performance<br />

TABLE 1: Candidates for the Dr Norm Thompson<br />

Shield for best fibre quality in a CSD trial<br />

Grower Variety Length Strength Micronaire<br />

Ian Gourley Sicala 1.31 (42) 33.8 4.2<br />

Narrabri, NSW 340BRF<br />

Ben Coulton Sicala 1.30 (42) 34.3 4.4<br />

North Star, Qld 340BRF<br />

Andrew Gill Sicala 1.32 (42) 33.8 3.7<br />

Narromine, NSW 340BRF<br />

Angus McClymont<br />

Goondiwindi, Qld<br />

Sicala<br />

340BRF<br />

1.29 (41) 33.2 3.9<br />

August–September 2012 The Australian Cottongrower — 53

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!