09.02.2013 Views

growers@sgcotton.com.au Roger Tomkins - Greenmount Press

growers@sgcotton.com.au Roger Tomkins - Greenmount Press

growers@sgcotton.com.au Roger Tomkins - Greenmount Press

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Mapping estimated deep drainage<br />

in the lower Namoi Valley<br />

■ By Alice Woodforth and John Triantafilis<br />

THE Murray Darling Basin (MDB) is a prime agricultural region<br />

of southeastern Australia. It accounts for half of all water<br />

used for irrigation in Australia. But there are increasing<br />

pressures on irrigators to improve water use efficiency (WUE)<br />

owing to increasing demands on water for environmental flows,<br />

new mining industries (such as coal seam gas production) and<br />

in some instances to manage shallow water tables. In addition,<br />

climate change modeling suggests that not only will rainfall<br />

decrease but it will also be<strong>com</strong>e more variable in the MDB.<br />

One way to improve WUE in irrigated areas is to reduce<br />

deep drainage (DD). This is bec<strong>au</strong>se DD is synonymous with the<br />

network of prior stream channels that characterise the Riverine<br />

Plains of the MDB. The most accurate way to measure DD is to<br />

use a lysimeter. But these are expensive to install and require<br />

significant time to equilibrate. More <strong>com</strong>monly, DD is estimated<br />

using chloride mass balance (CMB) models.<br />

Despite this advantage, the labour in the field and laboratory<br />

time and expense of gaining estimates of DD means the spatial<br />

variability across a district scale is usually still not attainable.<br />

Electromagnetic (EM) induction instruments are useful in valueadding<br />

to the limited number of estimates. This is bec<strong>au</strong>se an EM<br />

instrument measures many soil properties that can affect the rate<br />

of DD (such as clay content).<br />

In this research project, we explored the use of a CMB model<br />

coupled with EM34 data to map the spatial distribution of DD<br />

across the predominantly irrigated cotton growing area around<br />

Wee Waa. The main features of the valley are the clay plains,<br />

prior stream formations, the Pilliga scrub and a coarse-textured<br />

dissected flood plain (Figure 1).<br />

EM Survey, CMB modeling and calibration<br />

EM34 measurements were made on an approximate 1 km<br />

grid, with a total of 1869 sites visited (Figure 2). In order to<br />

<strong>com</strong>plement this data, a soil sampling scheme was developed<br />

from the EM34 data and approximately 36 soil sample locations<br />

were selected across the study area. At each site soil samples<br />

FIGuRE 1: Map of physiographic units<br />

(Stannard and Kelly, 1977)<br />

were obtained at one metre depths and to a maximum depth of<br />

9–18 metres across the study area.<br />

The soil samples were analysed for chloride ion concentration.<br />

The data was then entered into a simple CMB model along with<br />

other information obtained from previous research. This included<br />

an estimate of the concentration of chloride in irrigation water<br />

and rainfall, an estimate of irrigation water application (i.e. 600<br />

mm/year) and the average annual rainfall (i.e. 584 mm/year)<br />

around Wee Waa.<br />

Figure 3 shows the relationships between DD and EM34<br />

data. The relationship can approximately be described as curvelinear.<br />

Using a slightly more statistically rigorous analysis of this<br />

relationship (for example, we log transformed the estimates of<br />

DD), we used the subsequent relationship to estimate DD from<br />

the EM34 data.<br />

Map of estimated DD<br />

Figure 4 shows the spatial distribution of estimated DD (mm/<br />

year) generated from our calibrated EM34 data. The largest<br />

estimates are associated with the Pilliga Scrub (around >450<br />

mm) which is located to the south of Wee Waa. Some c<strong>au</strong>tion is<br />

required with these estimates of DD bec<strong>au</strong>se only one soil sample<br />

location was collected in this area. Nevertheless, estimated DD is<br />

consistent with the fact that few irrigated cotton growing farms<br />

have been developed for furrow irrigation here.<br />

Where fields have been developed for furrow irrigation, the<br />

length of the field is short (about 300 metres). More <strong>com</strong>monly,<br />

irrigation is limited to sprinkler or trickle irrigation and for the<br />

purpose of vegetable (e.g. potatoes) or horticultural (e.g. table<br />

grapes) production, respectively. The former is grown under<br />

centre pivot irrigation.<br />

In terms of physiographic units upon which fields have been<br />

developed for irrigated cotton production, the largest estimates<br />

of DD (350-450 mm/year) correspond with the low dissected<br />

floodplain west of the ACRI and either side of the Spring Plain<br />

road. Here, the irrigated fields are small – the length of the<br />

FIGuRE 2: Location of EM34 measurement sites<br />

and soil sample locations<br />

44 — The Australian Cottongrower August–September 2012

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!