09.02.2013 Views

growers@sgcotton.com.au Roger Tomkins - Greenmount Press

growers@sgcotton.com.au Roger Tomkins - Greenmount Press

growers@sgcotton.com.au Roger Tomkins - Greenmount Press

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The changing face of aphids and<br />

mites in Australian cotton<br />

■■By■Grant■Herron,■Senior■Research■Scientist,■NSW■DPI,■Camden There has now been a long history of resistance monitoring<br />

for both aphids and mites from Australian cotton with<br />

much of this being done by our team at NSW DPI.<br />

Mites<br />

Up until 1980, both bean spider mite and two-spotted mite<br />

were collected and tested for resistance, but for 30 years bean<br />

spider mite disappeared from Australian cotton. This is unusual<br />

bec<strong>au</strong>se normally bean spider mite will displace two-spotted<br />

mite. The reason probably relates to two-spotted mite’s ability to<br />

develop resistance. For instance, bean spider mite resistance to<br />

the OP monocrotophos never exceeded about 10 fold, yet twospotted<br />

mite resistance to the same chemical was often hundreds<br />

of fold (Figure 1).<br />

This gave two-spotted mite a huge advantage over bean spider<br />

mite in heavily sprayed cotton and bean spider mite disappeared.<br />

Jump forward a few decades and the cotton ecosystem is<br />

dominated by Bt cotton and the sprays are all but gone. Now<br />

bean spider mite again has the advantage over two-spotted mite<br />

and in theory it should start to displace it. Anecdotally this is<br />

exactly what seems to be happening with mite samples collected<br />

by myself in Queensland invariably containing bean spider mite<br />

while two-spotted mite is more abundant in NSW.<br />

The reason for this NSW preference is not clear, as two-spotted<br />

mite is still quite resistant to some chemicals, but fortuitously not<br />

to its mainstay control Comite (Figure 2). The bean spider mite<br />

resurgence is <strong>com</strong>plicating the laboratory based resistance testing<br />

bec<strong>au</strong>se bean spider mite will displace two-spotted mite in the<br />

lab prior to testing being done.<br />

Additionally, if it happens that again bean spider mite needs<br />

to be tested for resistance, the chemicals used in cotton are now<br />

different to what they used to be. reference baseline data for<br />

newer chemicals is not available and this baseline information<br />

would have to be generated. Finally, the damage done to cotton<br />

by bean spider mite looks different, less severe. Bean spider mite<br />

is likely a whole new management ball game.<br />

PhD student Kate Marshall with PhD supervisor grant Herron<br />

testing neonicotinoid resistant cotton aphid.<br />

Aphids<br />

Aphid problems in cotton up until the mid 1990s were<br />

little more than deciding what to spray. At the end of 1998<br />

a resistance issue developed in cotton aphid with resistance<br />

detected to all registered chemicals used for its control.<br />

The biggest loss to resistance was the IPM friendly chemical<br />

Pirimor. In laboratory tests with high level resistant aphids, the<br />

product could surround and cover aphids like snow but do<br />

nothing.<br />

Figure 1: Monocrotophos resistance detected<br />

in two-spotted mite (Tetranychus urticae) and<br />

bean spider mite (Tetranychus ludeni) between<br />

1976 and 1994<br />

Figure 2: Percent strains of cotton aphid<br />

containing propargite (e.g. Comite) resistant<br />

individuals between 2004–05 and 2011–12.<br />

NB: No strains tested in 2009–10.<br />

20 — The Australian Cottongrower August–September 2012

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!