growers@sgcotton.com.au Roger Tomkins - Greenmount Press
growers@sgcotton.com.au Roger Tomkins - Greenmount Press
growers@sgcotton.com.au Roger Tomkins - Greenmount Press
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Carbon and energy costs –<br />
a better bottom line<br />
The ‘Carbon and Energy Costs – A better bottom line’<br />
session of the Australian Cotton Conference showcased four<br />
diverse speakers covering carbon farming, and energy and input<br />
efficiency in productive cotton farming systems.<br />
Speakers included current industry and leading national<br />
researchers: Dr Jeff Baldock, CSIRO, Francois Visser of University<br />
of Qld, Dr Lance Pendergast and Prof Snow Barlow of the<br />
University of Melbourne.<br />
Optimising inputs and managing cotton farming systems for<br />
productivity present ‘win-win’ solutions for growers, in terms of<br />
cost savings, productivity and profitability, and potential benefits<br />
from the government’s new Clean Energy Package and voluntary<br />
Carbon Farming Initiative.<br />
More work was needed though, particularly in providing<br />
information on the economics around changing practices, to help<br />
growers decide on the potential.<br />
Dr Jeff Baldock reiterated the potential for carbon accounting<br />
in Australian soils, but its variability means there won’t be one<br />
solution.<br />
He said it was important for farmers to understand<br />
requirements before engaging in carbon markets, and potential<br />
constraints which included implications on land values and<br />
uncertainty in carbon value.<br />
Francois Visser of the University of Queensland has been<br />
working on carbon footprint accounting for cotton farms, which<br />
was particularly important given the rise of sustainability labelling<br />
globally and the fact that it was increasingly being pushed back<br />
through the supply chain to the grower.<br />
He said the industry had an opportunity to use the cotton<br />
Best Management Practices (BMP) system to take Australian BMP<br />
cotton to the market – as ‘carbon light cotton’.<br />
Lance Pendergast of QDAFF presented case studies from his<br />
Irrigation Systems Energy Benchmarking work. One case study<br />
saw a grower make a $64,000 annual saving after investing in a<br />
pump efficiency upgrade.<br />
Lance sees potential for upgrades across the industry, in<br />
undertaking irrigation energy efficiency measurements and using<br />
benchmarks to help realise cost and labour savings.<br />
Prof Snow Barlow ended the session by providing a broad<br />
perspective, reminding the <strong>au</strong>dience of the government’s<br />
Rob Holmes (left) congratulates new Cotton Australia<br />
Chairman Lyndon Mulligan and wife Davina.<br />
bipartisan <strong>com</strong>mitment to reduce GHG emissions.<br />
Projected climate changes in cotton growing areas will see<br />
temperature increases and potential increases in land sown to<br />
cotton, especially in the south. There is uncertainty around water<br />
availability.<br />
Snow reminded listeners to not get distracted by the prospect<br />
of making big money from carbon credits, “see it within your<br />
farming business, working synergistically with productivity and<br />
input efficiency gains.”<br />
Snow focused on highlighting potential mitigation<br />
opportunities through reductions in nitrous oxide emissions from<br />
nitrogen fertiliser under the CFI.<br />
This R&D will ultimately help cotton growers manage<br />
increasing costs of production, a real challenge particularly given<br />
the introduction of the carbon tax and rising energy costs. The<br />
cotton myBMP Energy and Input Efficiency module provides a<br />
great resource of current relevant industry information.<br />
Session chair Hamish McIntyre of Cotton Australia reiterated<br />
that the industry looks forward to future farming systems that<br />
incorporate carbon and energy management, and provide<br />
farmers with an ability to offset cost of production and get<br />
recognition for good land stewardship.<br />
Moving round bale<br />
pickers presents a<br />
challenge<br />
With an estimated 80 per cent of this year’s cotton crop<br />
picked with the John Deere 7760 round-bale picker, there was<br />
plenty of interest in the conference session that focussed on this<br />
technology.<br />
Cotton Australia’s Field Policy Manager James Houlahan<br />
outlined the efforts Cotton Australia had made to gain permits<br />
and exemption for the road transporting of these machines that<br />
exceed the standard dimension and mass limits.<br />
James leads the cotton industry transport supply chain program<br />
and reported on the success of negotiations with the state<br />
transport <strong>au</strong>thorities in achieving special permits for the ‘walking’<br />
and ‘floating’ of the large John Deere 7760 round bale picker.<br />
Cotton Australia has been able to successfully negotiate with<br />
both Queensland and NSW transport <strong>au</strong>thorities for special<br />
permits with strict operating conditions that allow the round<br />
bale cotton pickers to be safely transported on roads during the<br />
cotton harvest season.<br />
The safe loading, restraint and transport of the round cotton<br />
modules was also the focus of James’s presentation. There has<br />
been a significant amount of work been undertaken to test<br />
and assess load restraint systems for the safe cartage of round<br />
modules on semi-trailers.<br />
In a related session, Andrew Vanderstock, Operations Manager<br />
with Namoi Cotton and current Chair of the Cotton Ginners<br />
Association told the conference that contamination issues – in<br />
particular the plastic wrap on the round modules was an area that<br />
needs to be carefully managed so that plastic does not find its<br />
way into the ginning process and contaminate the lint.<br />
A growers panel of owner/operators of the John Deere 7760<br />
round bale pickers provided the <strong>au</strong>dience with the benefit of their<br />
varied experiences in using the new cotton harvesting technology<br />
and also some valuable <strong>com</strong>parisons of the differences between<br />
the older conventional picker technology versus the new<br />
round bale picker.<br />
18 — The Australian Cottongrower August–September 2012