09.02.2013 Views

growers@sgcotton.com.au Roger Tomkins - Greenmount Press

growers@sgcotton.com.au Roger Tomkins - Greenmount Press

growers@sgcotton.com.au Roger Tomkins - Greenmount Press

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Carbon and energy costs –<br />

a better bottom line<br />

The ‘Carbon and Energy Costs – A better bottom line’<br />

session of the Australian Cotton Conference showcased four<br />

diverse speakers covering carbon farming, and energy and input<br />

efficiency in productive cotton farming systems.<br />

Speakers included current industry and leading national<br />

researchers: Dr Jeff Baldock, CSIRO, Francois Visser of University<br />

of Qld, Dr Lance Pendergast and Prof Snow Barlow of the<br />

University of Melbourne.<br />

Optimising inputs and managing cotton farming systems for<br />

productivity present ‘win-win’ solutions for growers, in terms of<br />

cost savings, productivity and profitability, and potential benefits<br />

from the government’s new Clean Energy Package and voluntary<br />

Carbon Farming Initiative.<br />

More work was needed though, particularly in providing<br />

information on the economics around changing practices, to help<br />

growers decide on the potential.<br />

Dr Jeff Baldock reiterated the potential for carbon accounting<br />

in Australian soils, but its variability means there won’t be one<br />

solution.<br />

He said it was important for farmers to understand<br />

requirements before engaging in carbon markets, and potential<br />

constraints which included implications on land values and<br />

uncertainty in carbon value.<br />

Francois Visser of the University of Queensland has been<br />

working on carbon footprint accounting for cotton farms, which<br />

was particularly important given the rise of sustainability labelling<br />

globally and the fact that it was increasingly being pushed back<br />

through the supply chain to the grower.<br />

He said the industry had an opportunity to use the cotton<br />

Best Management Practices (BMP) system to take Australian BMP<br />

cotton to the market – as ‘carbon light cotton’.<br />

Lance Pendergast of QDAFF presented case studies from his<br />

Irrigation Systems Energy Benchmarking work. One case study<br />

saw a grower make a $64,000 annual saving after investing in a<br />

pump efficiency upgrade.<br />

Lance sees potential for upgrades across the industry, in<br />

undertaking irrigation energy efficiency measurements and using<br />

benchmarks to help realise cost and labour savings.<br />

Prof Snow Barlow ended the session by providing a broad<br />

perspective, reminding the <strong>au</strong>dience of the government’s<br />

Rob Holmes (left) congratulates new Cotton Australia<br />

Chairman Lyndon Mulligan and wife Davina.<br />

bipartisan <strong>com</strong>mitment to reduce GHG emissions.<br />

Projected climate changes in cotton growing areas will see<br />

temperature increases and potential increases in land sown to<br />

cotton, especially in the south. There is uncertainty around water<br />

availability.<br />

Snow reminded listeners to not get distracted by the prospect<br />

of making big money from carbon credits, “see it within your<br />

farming business, working synergistically with productivity and<br />

input efficiency gains.”<br />

Snow focused on highlighting potential mitigation<br />

opportunities through reductions in nitrous oxide emissions from<br />

nitrogen fertiliser under the CFI.<br />

This R&D will ultimately help cotton growers manage<br />

increasing costs of production, a real challenge particularly given<br />

the introduction of the carbon tax and rising energy costs. The<br />

cotton myBMP Energy and Input Efficiency module provides a<br />

great resource of current relevant industry information.<br />

Session chair Hamish McIntyre of Cotton Australia reiterated<br />

that the industry looks forward to future farming systems that<br />

incorporate carbon and energy management, and provide<br />

farmers with an ability to offset cost of production and get<br />

recognition for good land stewardship.<br />

Moving round bale<br />

pickers presents a<br />

challenge<br />

With an estimated 80 per cent of this year’s cotton crop<br />

picked with the John Deere 7760 round-bale picker, there was<br />

plenty of interest in the conference session that focussed on this<br />

technology.<br />

Cotton Australia’s Field Policy Manager James Houlahan<br />

outlined the efforts Cotton Australia had made to gain permits<br />

and exemption for the road transporting of these machines that<br />

exceed the standard dimension and mass limits.<br />

James leads the cotton industry transport supply chain program<br />

and reported on the success of negotiations with the state<br />

transport <strong>au</strong>thorities in achieving special permits for the ‘walking’<br />

and ‘floating’ of the large John Deere 7760 round bale picker.<br />

Cotton Australia has been able to successfully negotiate with<br />

both Queensland and NSW transport <strong>au</strong>thorities for special<br />

permits with strict operating conditions that allow the round<br />

bale cotton pickers to be safely transported on roads during the<br />

cotton harvest season.<br />

The safe loading, restraint and transport of the round cotton<br />

modules was also the focus of James’s presentation. There has<br />

been a significant amount of work been undertaken to test<br />

and assess load restraint systems for the safe cartage of round<br />

modules on semi-trailers.<br />

In a related session, Andrew Vanderstock, Operations Manager<br />

with Namoi Cotton and current Chair of the Cotton Ginners<br />

Association told the conference that contamination issues – in<br />

particular the plastic wrap on the round modules was an area that<br />

needs to be carefully managed so that plastic does not find its<br />

way into the ginning process and contaminate the lint.<br />

A growers panel of owner/operators of the John Deere 7760<br />

round bale pickers provided the <strong>au</strong>dience with the benefit of their<br />

varied experiences in using the new cotton harvesting technology<br />

and also some valuable <strong>com</strong>parisons of the differences between<br />

the older conventional picker technology versus the new<br />

round bale picker.<br />

18 — The Australian Cottongrower August–September 2012

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!