09.02.2013 Views

Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist

Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist

Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

debatable question as to whether they really got Novatian covered with water,<br />

the intent being immersion as near as possible is clear from the Greek record.<br />

f137<br />

(2.) Considering that immersion was the universally recognized law and<br />

custom at that time, as he recovered, if they did not get him covered in baptism<br />

at first, there is reason to believe that on his recovery he was baptized. Vales<br />

states that clinics, when they recovered, were required to go to the bishop to<br />

supply what was wanting in that baptism. f139<br />

That Novatian did not so do may be only another slander against him.<br />

Considering the extent to which he was slandered, to believe that on his<br />

recovery he was baptized, is much easier than to believe that, against the rule,<br />

the custom and the Scriptures, which were for only immersion, he was content<br />

with his clinic baptism and that so many hundreds of ministers and churches<br />

followed his leadership when he was unbaptized, and that, too, without<br />

protesting against his imperfect baptism.<br />

(3.) Admit all that <strong>Baptist</strong>s opponents claim, viz.: that he never was, in any<br />

way, immersed, as the Novatians were not founded by him and did not get<br />

their baptism from him, all it proves is, that one <strong>Baptist</strong> minister, among<br />

hundreds, from a failure in the attempt to cover him with water, was never<br />

baptized. But, as Novatian baptized by the authority of immersionist churches,<br />

his baptisms were all valid, though the churches were censurable for allowing<br />

him to baptize while himself imperfectly baptized. Should it, then, be conceded<br />

to <strong>Baptist</strong> opponents that Novatian was imperfectedly baptized, it proves but a<br />

censurable irregularity, in but one case, in no way invalidating any church<br />

claim.<br />

As to Novatian and his people believing in baptismal regeneration, the charge<br />

rests on Cornelius’ slanderous account of his baptism. In fact, Cornelius does<br />

not say Novatian was baptized to save his soul. He says he was baptized on<br />

what was, at the time of his baptism, thought to be his death bed. Death bed<br />

baptisms are as reliable as death bed conversions. The Novatian high<br />

conception of spiritual life and the consequent battle of the Novatians for a<br />

spiritual church are utterly incompatible with the charge that Novatian and his<br />

people believed in water salvation. No party has ever contended for a<br />

scripturally regenerate church while holding to baptismal regeneration.<br />

Hippolytus has been quoted as a Novatian and as proving the Novatians<br />

believed in baptismal salvation. But Armitage says f140 Hippolytus “is supposed<br />

to have suffered martyrdom by drowning in the Tiber, A.D. 235-239.” Hase f141<br />

says: “Hippolytus could hardly have lived to witness the Novatian schism.”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!