09.02.2013 Views

Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist

Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist

Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 6. — THE NEGATIVE PROOF. BAPTIST<br />

CHURCH PERPETUITY, FROM THE APOSTOLIC<br />

AGE TO THE PRESENT, EVIDENT FROM BAPTIST<br />

OPPONENTS BEING UNABLE TO ASSIGN AND<br />

AGREE ON ANY HUMAN FOUNDER AND POST-<br />

APOSTOLIC ORIGIN FOR BAPTIST CHURCHES.<br />

Answering my questions: When, where and by whom was the first <strong>Baptist</strong><br />

church originated? I have the following from Roman Catholic bishops, priests<br />

and Protestant scholars, given me A.D. 1893:<br />

The priest of Shreveport got out of the difficulty by writing: “You have in<br />

Dallas two or three priests with valuable libraries. Interview them.” — J.<br />

Gentille, Shreveport, La. The Archbishop of Cincinnati wrote me:<br />

“I cannot get time to answer all my letters. These questions cannot be<br />

answered without explanations, which I have not time to make. And there is<br />

no reason why you come to me for them. You have men near you — priests<br />

and others — who can do it better than G.H. Elder.” (My italics.)<br />

With more judgment, many other Romanists dropped my letters aside without<br />

so much as acknowledging their being received. With less judgment than any<br />

of the others, the following Romanists attempted to answer:<br />

The bishop of New Orleans, answered: “In Germany, called Anabaptists, by<br />

Nich. Stork, 1522.”<br />

Priest Jno. S. Murphy, of St. Patrick’s <strong>Church</strong>, Houston, Texas, answered:<br />

“Stork, a short time after Luther proclaimed his heresies.”<br />

It seems that the bishop of New Orleans, the Houston priest, and one or two<br />

Protestant writers, when they answered, must have had the same Romish,<br />

slanderous authority before them. But the Cincinnati arch-bishop, the<br />

Shreveport priest, and other scholars, either knew nothing of that authority, did<br />

not remember it, or did not think it reliable. Here comes the spokesman for<br />

Cardinal Gibbons, who contradicts the New Orleans bishop and the Houston<br />

priest, and, by his attempt to answer, without intending to do so, concedes the<br />

impossibility of assigning the origin of <strong>Baptist</strong> churches to any man or age<br />

since the first century. He writes:<br />

“Cardinal’s residence, Baltimore, Md., Sept. 4, 1893. Your questions are not<br />

possibly capable of exact and very positive answers. The <strong>Baptist</strong> church of the<br />

present time seems to be the lineal descendant of the old Anabaptists of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!