09.02.2013 Views

Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist

Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist

Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Providence is for it. Prof. Whitsitt’s attempt to evade the force of Cotton<br />

Mather’s positive testimony, by saying that Mather’s grandfather knew<br />

nothing of the existence of Clarke’s church, Is against him, since Cotton<br />

Mather’s not recording any non-existence of Clarke’s church while he did<br />

the non-existence of Williams’ proves he Investigated the facts instead of<br />

blindly following his grandfather. Prof. Whitsitt virtually surrenders the<br />

question when he says, “Roger Williams was never a <strong>Baptist</strong>. … I do not<br />

think he was very much of a <strong>Baptist</strong> a day In his life.” “I do not suppose<br />

that Williams was very much of a <strong>Baptist</strong>. He founded a <strong>Baptist</strong> church<br />

simply because there was no other sort to be found, there was nothing else<br />

for them to do. He had never had anything to do with <strong>Baptist</strong>s any time In<br />

his life. He formed a church now simply because he was in that particular<br />

situation. had no particular leading that way; he never was a <strong>Baptist</strong> at<br />

heart. I do not reckon there was any body in that colony who was a <strong>Baptist</strong>.<br />

I hive a notion they formed a <strong>Baptist</strong> church simply because they had<br />

nothing else to do.” — Lect. to his class. Now, Prof. Whitsitt, or any one<br />

else, is welcome to all <strong>Baptist</strong> claims he can get out of any such a thing of<br />

any such origin as he concedes to the Williams affair. See pp. 381, 382,<br />

381, 385, 380 of this book.<br />

ft892 Adlam’s First Bap. Ch. in Am., pp. 10-11.<br />

ft893 Adlam’s First Bap. Ch. in Am. p. 13.<br />

ft894 Adlam’s First Bap. Ch. in Am. p. 14.<br />

ft895 Backus’ Hist. Bap., vol. 2, pp. 285,290-291.<br />

ft896 Adlam’s First Bap. Ch. in Am., pp. 16-17.<br />

ft897 Adlam’s First Bap. Ch. in Am., pp. 36-39.<br />

ft898 Trilemma, p. 13.<br />

ft899 Letter to Author of this book, dated Apr. 25, 1893.<br />

ft900 Adlam’s First Bap. Ch. in America, p. 19.<br />

ft901 Adlam’s First Bap. Ch. in Am., pp. 19-21; Backus’ Hist. Bap., vol. I, p.<br />

497.<br />

ft902 Armitage’s Hist. Bap., p. 665.<br />

ft903 Backus’ Hist. Bap., vol. 1, p. 125.<br />

ft904 This “disorderly” way, evidently, is what he calls the <strong>Baptist</strong> way.<br />

ft905 Backus’ Hist. Bap., vol. 1, p. 125.<br />

ft906 Idem, vol. 1, p. 125.<br />

ft907 Adlam’s “First Bap. Ch. in America,” p. 86.<br />

ft908 Bap. Quart. Rev., vol. 10, p. 191 — Prof. J.C. C. Clarke.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!