Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist

Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist

landmarkbaptist.org
from landmarkbaptist.org More from this publisher
09.02.2013 Views

ft529 This shows that Baptists yet have no history worthy of the name history. ft530 In The Bap. Quar. Rev., vol. 12, No. 43. ft531 Palfry’s Hist. New Eng., vol. 1, p. 414. ft532 May’s Const. Hist. Eng., vol. 2, p. 269. ft533 Froude’s Hist. Eng., vol. 2, p. 358. ft534 Bancroft Hist. U.S., vol. 2, p. 457 — old ed. ft535 Every Baptist church is a complete church. No Baptist church is united to any other Baptist church by church organization. From the point of church organization no Baptist church is connected with any other Baptist church. Just as each man s as completely a man as it there were no other man in existence, so each Baptist church is as completely a church as if no other church existed. The only connection, therefore, that Baptist churches have to each other s that of likeness, spirit and mutual relation and obligation to their Lord and to His cause. Much contusion In examining Baptist Church Perpetuity grows out of the mind being prepossessed by the Romish doctrine of the church being made of all the congregations and their hierarchy, all In one organization, and thus connected by outward organization. I mean only by historical connection of Baptist churches that they are connected by the bond of spiritual brotherhood and service to their Lord, by Identity of doctrine and practice and by one being the production of another, as one college produces another, or as offspring s the production of parent. ft536 Neander’s Mat. Chr. Ch., vol. 1, p. 239. ft537 Robinson’s Eccl. Resh., p. 121. ft538 Schaff-Herzog Ency., vol. 2, p. 1562. ft539 Schaff-Herzog Ency., vol. 2, p. 1562. ft540 Idem, vol. 2, p. 1670. ft541 Idem, vol. 2, p. 1671. ft542 Haft’s Hist. Chr. Ch., p. 66. ft543 Guericke’s Ch. Hist., vol. 1, p. 278. ft544 Fisher’s Hist. Chr. Ch., p.109. ft545 Hase’s Hist. Chr. Ch. p. 67. ft546 Baptist Layman’s Book. p. 17. ft547 Gieseler’s Ch. Hist., vol. 1, p. 255; see also Socrates’ Eccl. Hist., Book 4, ch. 28. ft548 Schaff’s Hist. Chr. Ch. vol. 1, p. 451.

ft549 Schaff-Herzog Ency., vol. 2, p. 1072. ft550 Schaff’s Hist. Chr. Ch., vol. 2, p. 365. ft551 Hase’s Hist. Chr. Ch., p. 158. ft552 Vol. 1, p. 669. ft553 Guericke’s Ch. Hist., vol. 1, p. 283. ft554 Wadington’s Ch. Hist., p. 153. ft555 Vol. 2, p. 1672. ft556 Kurtz’s Ch. Hist., vol. 1, pp. 134, 195. ft557 Wadington’s Ch. Hist., p. 79. ft558 Schaff’s Hist. Chr. Ch., vol. 1, p. 451. ft559 Kurtz’s Chr. Hist., vol. 1, p. 133. ft560 Guericke’s Ch. Hist., p. 192. ft561 Gieseler’s Ch. Hist., vol. 1, pp. 143-144. ft562 Neander’s Hist. Chr. Ch., vol. 8, p. 244. ft563 Gieseler’s Ch. Hist., vol. 2, p. 21. ft564 Harnack says of the Novatians: “In the East, however, the party lived until the sixth or seventh century.” — Schaff-Herzog Ency., vol. 2, p. 1672. And Wadington speaks of “Armenia the province of” the Paulician “birth.” — Wadington’s Ch. Hist., p. 478 Fisher’s Hist. Chr. Ch., p. 162. We have seen that the Montanists, the Novatians and the Donatists numbered their converts “throughout the Roman Empire.” ft565 Universal Knowledge, vol.: 11, p. 39. ft566 Wadington’s Ch. Hist., p. 289. ft567 The Campbellite, plea that names Indicate Scriptural or un-scriptural character, and that perpetuity must be traced by names, has no bass in reason, history or Scripture: ft568 Guericke’s Ch. Hist., vol. 2, p. 76. ft569 Idem, p. 78. ft570 Robinson’s Eccl. Resh., pp. 126,127. ft571 Wadington’s Ch. Hist., p. 286. ft572 Hase’s Hist. Chr. Ch. p. 262. ft573 Prof. Geo. P. Fisher’s Hist. Car. p. 194. ft574 Schaff-Herzog Ency., vol. 1, p. 47. ft575 Idem, p. 420

ft549 Schaff-Herzog Ency., vol. 2, p. 1072.<br />

ft550 Schaff’s Hist. Chr. Ch., vol. 2, p. 365.<br />

ft551 Hase’s Hist. Chr. Ch., p. 158.<br />

ft552 Vol. 1, p. 669.<br />

ft553 Guericke’s Ch. Hist., vol. 1, p. 283.<br />

ft554 Wadington’s Ch. Hist., p. 153.<br />

ft555 Vol. 2, p. 1672.<br />

ft556 Kurtz’s Ch. Hist., vol. 1, pp. 134, 195.<br />

ft557 Wadington’s Ch. Hist., p. 79.<br />

ft558 Schaff’s Hist. Chr. Ch., vol. 1, p. 451.<br />

ft559 Kurtz’s Chr. Hist., vol. 1, p. 133.<br />

ft560 Guericke’s Ch. Hist., p. 192.<br />

ft561 Gieseler’s Ch. Hist., vol. 1, pp. 143-144.<br />

ft562 Neander’s Hist. Chr. Ch., vol. 8, p. 244.<br />

ft563 Gieseler’s Ch. Hist., vol. 2, p. 21.<br />

ft564 Harnack says of the Novatians: “In the East, however, the party lived until<br />

the sixth or seventh century.” — Schaff-Herzog Ency., vol. 2, p. 1672. And<br />

Wadington speaks of “Armenia the province of” the Paulician “birth.” —<br />

Wadington’s Ch. Hist., p. 478 Fisher’s Hist. Chr. Ch., p. 162. We have<br />

seen that the Montanists, the Novatians and the Donatists numbered their<br />

converts “throughout the Roman Empire.”<br />

ft565 Universal Knowledge, vol.: 11, p. 39.<br />

ft566 Wadington’s Ch. Hist., p. 289.<br />

ft567 The Campbellite, plea that names Indicate Scriptural or un-scriptural<br />

character, and that perpetuity must be traced by names, has no bass in<br />

reason, history or Scripture:<br />

ft568 Guericke’s Ch. Hist., vol. 2, p. 76.<br />

ft569 Idem, p. 78.<br />

ft570 Robinson’s Eccl. Resh., pp. 126,127.<br />

ft571 Wadington’s Ch. Hist., p. 286.<br />

ft572 Hase’s Hist. Chr. Ch. p. 262.<br />

ft573 Prof. Geo. P. Fisher’s Hist. Car. p. 194.<br />

ft574 Schaff-Herzog Ency., vol. 1, p. 47.<br />

ft575 Idem, p. 420

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!