Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist
Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist
ft28 That these Campbellites and Pedobaptists, when they come to justify the origin of their churches, say the gates of hell did prevail against the church, is true. But, then they speak from their churches; here they speak from the Bible. ft29 Com. in loco. ft30 Lard’s Quarterly Review for 1886, p. 309. ft31 Living Pulpit, p. 520. ft32 Gospel Advocate for 1867, p. 770. ft33 Isaac Errett’s Walks about Jerusalem, p. 142. ft34 Com. in loco. ft35 Com. in loco. ft36 To the attempt to evade the force of this argument, by the fact that Saul became King, and thence inhering God then was no longer King ( 1 Samuel 15:23) is a sufficient reply. ft37 In loco. ft38 Thayer’s, Robinson’s and other Lexicons. ft39 Inasmuch as the objection against Restricted Commission is based on the presumption that the church is not the custodian of New Testament institutions, the reader now has, In a nut shell, the key to the whole subject of “Close Communion.” No church which believes itself a New Testament church can extend its privileges to those outside its membership — those who differ from it. ft40 The Church of Christ, by Bannerman, vol. I, p, 51. ft41 Idem., p. 333. ft42 Idem., p. 439. ft43 Letters to Bishop Morris, p. 140. ft44 History Waldenses, Published by American Sunday School Union. ft45 Ecclesiology, p. 102. ft46 Christian System, p. 172. ft47 An invisible church — if there is such a thing — has neither ordinances nor anything else. if any passage, in the Bible, seems to mean an “Invisible” church, this passage is that one. The bad results of the “invisible” notion is seen in Cowboy-Deanism, now in Texas, and elsewhere. On the plea that the church is made up of all believers, wherever they are and to whatever they are connected, it is calling our churches “Babylon,” those who maintain them, “church idolators,” etc., and is endeavoring to destroy them. This is but the Pedobaptist notion of an “invisible church” “gone to
seed.” The “invisible” notion is the seed of ecclesiastical nihilism and anarchy, ft48 “The learned Dr. Owen fully maintains, that in no approved writer, for two hundred years after Christ, is mention made of any organized, visibly professing church, except a local congregation of Christians.” — Church Members’ Manual, p. 38. by William Crowell. ft49 That the reader may neither be confused nor think that I am confused I will again state that I use “church,” in the singular, to denote the aggregate of churches. Just as it is used in Matthew 16:18; Ephesians 1:22; 5:24; Colossians 1:18. It Is thus used by synecdoche, and I use “churches” for the independent organizations — the literal churches, as in Acts 9:31; 15:41; 16:5; 19:37: Romans 16:4. 16; 1 Corinthians 7:17; 11:16; 14:33,34; 16:1,19. To say “Baptist church” for all Baptist churches is, therefore, correct, so is it to say Baptist churches. ft50 Com, on 1 Timothy 3:15. ft51 On 1 Timothy 3:15, in “Old Landmarkism,” p. 44. ft52 Bannerman’s Church of Christ, vol. 1, pp. 332, 313. ft53 Advocates for receiving persons into our churches, on alien immersions, have fallen into the Romanist and Episcopal error: for they claim that we can have no proof of a regularly constituted ministry until we can trace “every minister’s pedigree back to apostolic times!” Just as If a Scriptural Church is not the authority to baptize! ft54 Idem, pp. 439, 442. ft55 True Christian Religion, p. 269. ft56 Buckle’s History of Civilization, vol. 1, p. 183. ft57 Bangs’ Original Church, p. 103. ft58 Idem, p. 302. ft59 Compendium of Methodism, p. 329. ft60 Idem, p. 337. ft61 Religious Denominations, p. 123. ft62 Religious Denominations, p. 109. ft63 Idem, p. 82. ft64 Idem, pp. 74, 75. ft65 Idem, p. 172. ft66 These sects, in the same breath, profess that “to have existed from the apostolic age is not necessary,” then exhaust their ingenuity in refuting
- Page 273 and 274: organized before Williams’ church
- Page 275 and 276: fellowship any who should do these
- Page 277 and 278: (3.) To assist those members that s
- Page 279 and 280: pleased the Lord to stir up their h
- Page 281 and 282: “agreed that the churches should
- Page 283 and 284: Silas Hart, 1795, died and left to
- Page 285 and 286: letters desiring the aid of this bo
- Page 287 and 288: “Elder James Osborne was a member
- Page 289 and 290: As there is no difference in doctri
- Page 291 and 292: So, without looking into their othe
- Page 293 and 294: laid on infant baptism. … We are
- Page 295 and 296: church. … I cannot be conscientio
- Page 297 and 298: spiritual choice for any souls. Hen
- Page 299 and 300: “We are surprised to learn that t
- Page 301 and 302: In defining baptizo the American ed
- Page 303 and 304: “That this is a mistranslation th
- Page 305 and 306: M. T. Yates and A.B. Cabaniss are a
- Page 307 and 308: the rate of 99 per cent.; Campbelli
- Page 309 and 310: THE FOLLOWING FROM THE BAPTIST YEAR
- Page 311 and 312: property, their good name, their li
- Page 313 and 314: doctrinal or practical word, they h
- Page 315 and 316: CHAPTER 29. — ST. PATRICK A BAPTI
- Page 317 and 318: crowned in A.D. 1057. When Collier
- Page 319 and 320: Thus, first, Irish monasteries were
- Page 321 and 322: REVELATION 20:2. ROMISH CHURCH TREE
- Page 323: FOOTNOTES ft1 In this list I have n
- Page 327 and 328: ft95 From wieder, meaning again, an
- Page 329 and 330: y aspersion, in the bed in whirl’
- Page 331 and 332: ft182 Israel of the Alps, vol. 1, p
- Page 333 and 334: ft245 Robinson’s Eccl. Researches
- Page 335 and 336: ft300 Kurtz’s Chr. Hist., vol. 1,
- Page 337 and 338: Proverbs 28:26; Genesis 6:5; 8:21;
- Page 339 and 340: sunt et prudenter expenderere deben
- Page 341 and 342: ft452 Idem, p. 124. ft453 Idem, p.
- Page 343 and 344: ft504 Fuller’s Ch. Hist. of Brita
- Page 345 and 346: ft549 Schaff-Herzog Ency., vol. 2,
- Page 347 and 348: ft607 Robinson’s Reel. Resh., pp.
- Page 349 and 350: Romish church, even permitting thei
- Page 351 and 352: ft713 In the Globe-Democrat of 1678
- Page 353 and 354: ft771 Idem, p. 79. ft772 Idem, p. 9
- Page 355 and 356: ft830 Goadby’s Bye Paths to Bap.
- Page 357 and 358: Williams’ society had dissolved;
- Page 359 and 360: ft909 Adlam’s “First Bap. Ch. i
- Page 361 and 362: Great Founder, Jesus Christ, than o
- Page 363 and 364: ft963 Crosby’s Hist. Eng. Bap., v
- Page 365 and 366: ft995 Idem, p. 27. ft996 Idem, p. 3
- Page 367 and 368: ft1030 These views are the Bible te
- Page 369 and 370: it does not destroy their sects. Ha
- Page 371: ft1089 The Ancient British and Iris
seed.” The “invisible” notion is the seed of ecclesiastical nihilism and<br />
anarchy,<br />
ft48 “The learned Dr. Owen fully maintains, that in no approved writer, for two<br />
hundred years after Christ, is mention made of any organized, visibly<br />
professing church, except a local congregation of Christians.” — <strong>Church</strong><br />
Members’ Manual, p. 38. by William Crowell.<br />
ft49 That the reader may neither be confused nor think that I am confused I will<br />
again state that I use “church,” in the singular, to denote the aggregate of<br />
churches. Just as it is used in Matthew 16:18; Ephesians 1:22; 5:24;<br />
Colossians 1:18. It Is thus used by synecdoche, and I use “churches” for<br />
the independent organizations — the literal churches, as in Acts 9:31;<br />
15:41; 16:5; 19:37: Romans 16:4. 16; 1 Corinthians 7:17; 11:16;<br />
14:33,34; 16:1,19. To say “<strong>Baptist</strong> church” for all <strong>Baptist</strong> churches is,<br />
therefore, correct, so is it to say <strong>Baptist</strong> churches.<br />
ft50 Com, on 1 Timothy 3:15.<br />
ft51 On 1 Timothy 3:15, in “Old <strong>Landmark</strong>ism,” p. 44.<br />
ft52 Bannerman’s <strong>Church</strong> of Christ, vol. 1, pp. 332, 313.<br />
ft53 Advocates for receiving persons into our churches, on alien immersions,<br />
have fallen into the Romanist and Episcopal error: for they claim that we<br />
can have no proof of a regularly constituted ministry until we can trace<br />
“every minister’s pedigree back to apostolic times!” Just as If a Scriptural<br />
<strong>Church</strong> is not the authority to baptize!<br />
ft54 Idem, pp. 439, 442.<br />
ft55 True Christian Religion, p. 269.<br />
ft56 Buckle’s History of Civilization, vol. 1, p. 183.<br />
ft57 Bangs’ Original <strong>Church</strong>, p. 103.<br />
ft58 Idem, p. 302.<br />
ft59 Compendium of Methodism, p. 329.<br />
ft60 Idem, p. 337.<br />
ft61 Religious Denominations, p. 123.<br />
ft62 Religious Denominations, p. 109.<br />
ft63 Idem, p. 82.<br />
ft64 Idem, pp. 74, 75.<br />
ft65 Idem, p. 172.<br />
ft66 These sects, in the same breath, profess that “to have existed from the<br />
apostolic age is not necessary,” then exhaust their ingenuity in refuting