Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist

Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist

landmarkbaptist.org
from landmarkbaptist.org More from this publisher
09.02.2013 Views

ft28 That these Campbellites and Pedobaptists, when they come to justify the origin of their churches, say the gates of hell did prevail against the church, is true. But, then they speak from their churches; here they speak from the Bible. ft29 Com. in loco. ft30 Lard’s Quarterly Review for 1886, p. 309. ft31 Living Pulpit, p. 520. ft32 Gospel Advocate for 1867, p. 770. ft33 Isaac Errett’s Walks about Jerusalem, p. 142. ft34 Com. in loco. ft35 Com. in loco. ft36 To the attempt to evade the force of this argument, by the fact that Saul became King, and thence inhering God then was no longer King ( 1 Samuel 15:23) is a sufficient reply. ft37 In loco. ft38 Thayer’s, Robinson’s and other Lexicons. ft39 Inasmuch as the objection against Restricted Commission is based on the presumption that the church is not the custodian of New Testament institutions, the reader now has, In a nut shell, the key to the whole subject of “Close Communion.” No church which believes itself a New Testament church can extend its privileges to those outside its membership — those who differ from it. ft40 The Church of Christ, by Bannerman, vol. I, p, 51. ft41 Idem., p. 333. ft42 Idem., p. 439. ft43 Letters to Bishop Morris, p. 140. ft44 History Waldenses, Published by American Sunday School Union. ft45 Ecclesiology, p. 102. ft46 Christian System, p. 172. ft47 An invisible church — if there is such a thing — has neither ordinances nor anything else. if any passage, in the Bible, seems to mean an “Invisible” church, this passage is that one. The bad results of the “invisible” notion is seen in Cowboy-Deanism, now in Texas, and elsewhere. On the plea that the church is made up of all believers, wherever they are and to whatever they are connected, it is calling our churches “Babylon,” those who maintain them, “church idolators,” etc., and is endeavoring to destroy them. This is but the Pedobaptist notion of an “invisible church” “gone to

seed.” The “invisible” notion is the seed of ecclesiastical nihilism and anarchy, ft48 “The learned Dr. Owen fully maintains, that in no approved writer, for two hundred years after Christ, is mention made of any organized, visibly professing church, except a local congregation of Christians.” — Church Members’ Manual, p. 38. by William Crowell. ft49 That the reader may neither be confused nor think that I am confused I will again state that I use “church,” in the singular, to denote the aggregate of churches. Just as it is used in Matthew 16:18; Ephesians 1:22; 5:24; Colossians 1:18. It Is thus used by synecdoche, and I use “churches” for the independent organizations — the literal churches, as in Acts 9:31; 15:41; 16:5; 19:37: Romans 16:4. 16; 1 Corinthians 7:17; 11:16; 14:33,34; 16:1,19. To say “Baptist church” for all Baptist churches is, therefore, correct, so is it to say Baptist churches. ft50 Com, on 1 Timothy 3:15. ft51 On 1 Timothy 3:15, in “Old Landmarkism,” p. 44. ft52 Bannerman’s Church of Christ, vol. 1, pp. 332, 313. ft53 Advocates for receiving persons into our churches, on alien immersions, have fallen into the Romanist and Episcopal error: for they claim that we can have no proof of a regularly constituted ministry until we can trace “every minister’s pedigree back to apostolic times!” Just as If a Scriptural Church is not the authority to baptize! ft54 Idem, pp. 439, 442. ft55 True Christian Religion, p. 269. ft56 Buckle’s History of Civilization, vol. 1, p. 183. ft57 Bangs’ Original Church, p. 103. ft58 Idem, p. 302. ft59 Compendium of Methodism, p. 329. ft60 Idem, p. 337. ft61 Religious Denominations, p. 123. ft62 Religious Denominations, p. 109. ft63 Idem, p. 82. ft64 Idem, pp. 74, 75. ft65 Idem, p. 172. ft66 These sects, in the same breath, profess that “to have existed from the apostolic age is not necessary,” then exhaust their ingenuity in refuting

seed.” The “invisible” notion is the seed of ecclesiastical nihilism and<br />

anarchy,<br />

ft48 “The learned Dr. Owen fully maintains, that in no approved writer, for two<br />

hundred years after Christ, is mention made of any organized, visibly<br />

professing church, except a local congregation of Christians.” — <strong>Church</strong><br />

Members’ Manual, p. 38. by William Crowell.<br />

ft49 That the reader may neither be confused nor think that I am confused I will<br />

again state that I use “church,” in the singular, to denote the aggregate of<br />

churches. Just as it is used in Matthew 16:18; Ephesians 1:22; 5:24;<br />

Colossians 1:18. It Is thus used by synecdoche, and I use “churches” for<br />

the independent organizations — the literal churches, as in Acts 9:31;<br />

15:41; 16:5; 19:37: Romans 16:4. 16; 1 Corinthians 7:17; 11:16;<br />

14:33,34; 16:1,19. To say “<strong>Baptist</strong> church” for all <strong>Baptist</strong> churches is,<br />

therefore, correct, so is it to say <strong>Baptist</strong> churches.<br />

ft50 Com, on 1 Timothy 3:15.<br />

ft51 On 1 Timothy 3:15, in “Old <strong>Landmark</strong>ism,” p. 44.<br />

ft52 Bannerman’s <strong>Church</strong> of Christ, vol. 1, pp. 332, 313.<br />

ft53 Advocates for receiving persons into our churches, on alien immersions,<br />

have fallen into the Romanist and Episcopal error: for they claim that we<br />

can have no proof of a regularly constituted ministry until we can trace<br />

“every minister’s pedigree back to apostolic times!” Just as If a Scriptural<br />

<strong>Church</strong> is not the authority to baptize!<br />

ft54 Idem, pp. 439, 442.<br />

ft55 True Christian Religion, p. 269.<br />

ft56 Buckle’s History of Civilization, vol. 1, p. 183.<br />

ft57 Bangs’ Original <strong>Church</strong>, p. 103.<br />

ft58 Idem, p. 302.<br />

ft59 Compendium of Methodism, p. 329.<br />

ft60 Idem, p. 337.<br />

ft61 Religious Denominations, p. 123.<br />

ft62 Religious Denominations, p. 109.<br />

ft63 Idem, p. 82.<br />

ft64 Idem, pp. 74, 75.<br />

ft65 Idem, p. 172.<br />

ft66 These sects, in the same breath, profess that “to have existed from the<br />

apostolic age is not necessary,” then exhaust their ingenuity in refuting

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!