Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist
Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist
stood firm, testifying to the truth as it is in Jesus, none deserve more love and more gratitude than the Baptist churches of America. In that church the faith of our fathers has never received a shock, nor been moved. Faithful in the field, enterprising, and for the last quarter of a century, with growing enterprise towards education, and now affording some of the ripest scholars in Biblical literature, which the world knows, and thousands of ministers that are second to none in zeal and success,” J. L. Winthrow, D.D., of Chicago, one of the most prominent of American Presbyterians: “I suppose there is not a denomination — I speak in no fulsome praise but literally — I think there is not a denomination of Evangelical christians that is thoroughly as sound theologically as the Baptist denomination. I believe it. After care-fully considering it I believe I speak the truth. Sound as my own denomination is, sound as some others are, and I do not cast unfriendly reflections upon any particular denomination, I do say, in my humble judgment, there is not an Evangelical denomination in America to-day that is as true to the simple, plain gospel of God, as it is recorded in the Word of God, as the Baptist denomination.” John Hall, D.D., who is perhaps the most prominent Presbyterian preacher in America, not long ago, said: “There is a tendency to heap censure on the Baptists of this country, because of their views. generally held and acted upon regarding the Lord’s Supper. ‘Close Communion’ is being assailed by many in the interests of Catholicity. It is a doubtful Catholicity to raise a popular cry against a most valuable body of people, who honestly and consistently go through what they deem an important principle. Our love for our brethren should surely include the Baptist brethren. And it is doubtful considering the lengths to which liberal ideas in this country have been carried, if there be not some gain to the community as a whole from a large denomination making a stand at a particular point, and reminding their brethren that there are church matters which we are not bound, and not even at liberty, to settle according to popular demand, as we would settle the route of a railroad.” Baptists by taking their “stand” where, in crying “non-essential,” the enemy makes his opening assaults on the faith, have thus guarded the precious gospel and been of inestimable blessing to all churches, and to the whole world. Thus Baptist influence on other denominations is more than ample justification for their existence. (3.) As to freedom, Baptist fruit has ever been only good. Starting from their great principles, that religion is a personal matter between the soul and God only, and that every Christian is a priest to God, Baptists have always and inevitably, opposed parent, church or State, making the
spiritual choice for any souls. Hence they, as does the New Testament, have always left every believer as a free man or woman in Christ Jesus. This constitutes every believer a ruler in God’s kingdom and every citizen a ruler in the State. In a former chapter we have seen that Baptists have given the world religious freedom. In a recent volume, entitled “The Puritan in Holland, England and America,” Douglas Campbell, A.M. LL. B., member of the Historical Association, says: “No words of praise can be too strong for the service which the English Baptists have rendered the cause of religious liberty. … They have never lost their influence as a leaven in the land. In purity of life and in substantial Christian work, they have been surpassed by the members of no other religious body. Having been the first British denomination of Christians to proclaim the principles of religious liberty, they were also the first to send out missionaries to the heathen. … In fact, taking their whole history together, if the Anabaptists of Holland had done nothing more for the world than to beget such offspring they would have repaid a thousand fold all the care shown for their liberties.” The Nonconformist and Independent, of London, the ablest Pedobaptist paper in the world, is thus quoted by The Standard, of Chicago: “To the Baptists must be credited the proud distinction first of doctrinal relationship to the earliest christians in Great Britain; and secondly, their priority in asserting the principle of liberty of conscience. Their essential doctrine was held firmly by the Christian communions which St. Augustine found in England when he arrived on his missionary enterprise, and no efforts of his could convert the Baptists to the ecclesiastical polity of the church of Rome. Coming to a more historical period, ‘it is,’ says Mr. Skeats, in his ‘History of Free Churches,’ ‘the singular and distinguished honor of the Baptists to have repudiated from their earliest history all coercive power over the conscience, and the actions of men with reference to religion. … They were the prolo-evangelists of the voluntary principle. … From the remote period referred to above, the principles of the Baptists have more or less permeated and leavened the religious life of England. The Lollards are said to have held their views. And Wickliffe is claimed as one of the early adherents of their theory of Christ’s teaching. … They have had to endure imprisonment, pain and death, for their rejection of the supremacy of the crown, and their assertion of a doctrine which cut at the very root of priestism.’” The New York Tribune recently said: “THE BAPTISTS HAVE SOLVED THE GREAT PROBLEM. They combine the most resolute conviction, the most stubborn belief in their own special doctrines with the most admirable tolerance of the faith of other Christians.” f1052
- Page 245 and 246: Orchard’s suggestion, that Spilsb
- Page 247 and 248: CHAPTER 25. — THROUGH WELSH BAPTI
- Page 249 and 250: In the year 603, Augustine, called
- Page 251 and 252: “The vale of Olchon is difficult
- Page 253 and 254: earth can tell where the church was
- Page 255 and 256: Says Cramp: “A church was immedia
- Page 257 and 258: any others than Wickenden, Brown, e
- Page 259 and 260: Armitage says: “In view of the fa
- Page 261 and 262: No church or minister ever originat
- Page 263 and 264: Brown, Wickenden and Dexter. … Th
- Page 265 and 266: “The first certain date in their
- Page 267 and 268: Massachusetts Baptist churches thus
- Page 269 and 270: “In the year 1751, Mr. Nicholas B
- Page 271 and 272: Christian era. … He had little ec
- Page 273 and 274: organized before Williams’ church
- Page 275 and 276: fellowship any who should do these
- Page 277 and 278: (3.) To assist those members that s
- Page 279 and 280: pleased the Lord to stir up their h
- Page 281 and 282: “agreed that the churches should
- Page 283 and 284: Silas Hart, 1795, died and left to
- Page 285 and 286: letters desiring the aid of this bo
- Page 287 and 288: “Elder James Osborne was a member
- Page 289 and 290: As there is no difference in doctri
- Page 291 and 292: So, without looking into their othe
- Page 293 and 294: laid on infant baptism. … We are
- Page 295: church. … I cannot be conscientio
- Page 299 and 300: “We are surprised to learn that t
- Page 301 and 302: In defining baptizo the American ed
- Page 303 and 304: “That this is a mistranslation th
- Page 305 and 306: M. T. Yates and A.B. Cabaniss are a
- Page 307 and 308: the rate of 99 per cent.; Campbelli
- Page 309 and 310: THE FOLLOWING FROM THE BAPTIST YEAR
- Page 311 and 312: property, their good name, their li
- Page 313 and 314: doctrinal or practical word, they h
- Page 315 and 316: CHAPTER 29. — ST. PATRICK A BAPTI
- Page 317 and 318: crowned in A.D. 1057. When Collier
- Page 319 and 320: Thus, first, Irish monasteries were
- Page 321 and 322: REVELATION 20:2. ROMISH CHURCH TREE
- Page 323 and 324: FOOTNOTES ft1 In this list I have n
- Page 325 and 326: seed.” The “invisible” notion
- Page 327 and 328: ft95 From wieder, meaning again, an
- Page 329 and 330: y aspersion, in the bed in whirl’
- Page 331 and 332: ft182 Israel of the Alps, vol. 1, p
- Page 333 and 334: ft245 Robinson’s Eccl. Researches
- Page 335 and 336: ft300 Kurtz’s Chr. Hist., vol. 1,
- Page 337 and 338: Proverbs 28:26; Genesis 6:5; 8:21;
- Page 339 and 340: sunt et prudenter expenderere deben
- Page 341 and 342: ft452 Idem, p. 124. ft453 Idem, p.
- Page 343 and 344: ft504 Fuller’s Ch. Hist. of Brita
- Page 345 and 346: ft549 Schaff-Herzog Ency., vol. 2,
stood firm, testifying to the truth as it is in Jesus, none deserve more love and<br />
more gratitude than the <strong>Baptist</strong> churches of America. In that church the faith<br />
of our fathers has never received a shock, nor been moved. Faithful in the<br />
field, enterprising, and for the last quarter of a century, with growing<br />
enterprise towards education, and now affording some of the ripest scholars in<br />
Biblical literature, which the world knows, and thousands of ministers that are<br />
second to none in zeal and success,”<br />
J. L. Winthrow, D.D., of Chicago, one of the most prominent of American<br />
Presbyterians:<br />
“I suppose there is not a denomination — I speak in no fulsome praise but<br />
literally — I think there is not a denomination of Evangelical christians that is<br />
thoroughly as sound theologically as the <strong>Baptist</strong> denomination. I believe it.<br />
After care-fully considering it I believe I speak the truth. Sound as my own<br />
denomination is, sound as some others are, and I do not cast unfriendly<br />
reflections upon any particular denomination, I do say, in my humble<br />
judgment, there is not an Evangelical denomination in America to-day that is<br />
as true to the simple, plain gospel of God, as it is recorded in the Word of<br />
God, as the <strong>Baptist</strong> denomination.”<br />
John Hall, D.D., who is perhaps the most prominent Presbyterian preacher in<br />
America, not long ago, said:<br />
“There is a tendency to heap censure on the <strong>Baptist</strong>s of this country, because<br />
of their views. generally held and acted upon regarding the Lord’s Supper.<br />
‘Close Communion’ is being assailed by many in the interests of Catholicity.<br />
It is a doubtful Catholicity to raise a popular cry against a most valuable body<br />
of people, who honestly and consistently go through what they deem an<br />
important principle. Our love for our brethren should surely include the<br />
<strong>Baptist</strong> brethren. And it is doubtful considering the lengths to which liberal<br />
ideas in this country have been carried, if there be not some gain to the<br />
community as a whole from a large denomination making a stand at a<br />
particular point, and reminding their brethren that there are church matters<br />
which we are not bound, and not even at liberty, to settle according to popular<br />
demand, as we would settle the route of a railroad.”<br />
<strong>Baptist</strong>s by taking their “stand” where, in crying “non-essential,” the enemy<br />
makes his opening assaults on the faith, have thus guarded the precious gospel<br />
and been of inestimable blessing to all churches, and to the whole world. Thus<br />
<strong>Baptist</strong> influence on other denominations is more than ample justification for<br />
their existence.<br />
(3.) As to freedom, <strong>Baptist</strong> fruit has ever been only good.<br />
Starting from their great principles, that religion is a personal matter between<br />
the soul and God only, and that every Christian is a priest to God, <strong>Baptist</strong>s<br />
have always and inevitably, opposed parent, church or State, making the