09.02.2013 Views

Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist

Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist

Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

odies from 1521 onwards … practiced strict communion. English General<br />

<strong>Baptist</strong>s, from the beginning of their history in 1610, were strict. Their<br />

Confessions published in 1611, 1660, 1663 and 1678 plainly require baptism<br />

before communion. Their churches would not even allow attendance upon<br />

other worship. They said, ‘The whole Scripture is against such Balaamitic and<br />

wavering actions.’ They were never open communion until in the last century<br />

they became Socinians. The Confessions of Faith of the Particular <strong>Baptist</strong>s in<br />

England are emphatic for strict communion. … The same is true of all the<br />

Confessions that can be found in <strong>Baptist</strong> history until 1688. Then the Century<br />

Confession of London which is always pleaded for open communion<br />

appeared. … This confession itself makes communion a church ordinance,<br />

and puts it after immersion; but as these brethren avowed their aim to show<br />

how little <strong>Baptist</strong>s differed from Presbyterians and Congregationalists they<br />

granted an appendix that while most of the churches adhered to strict<br />

communion some few did not; and they recognized this fact and would not<br />

impose conditions upon these.”<br />

Rev. Dr. Underwood, f1035 of Chilwell College, Nottinghamshire, in a paper,<br />

read before the English <strong>Baptist</strong> Union, at Birmingham, Oct., 1864, said:<br />

“In the matter of communion our churches are far from being uniform. Until<br />

within a very few years nearly all our churches were close and strict.”<br />

In the language of Rev. Porter S. Burbank, one of the most representative<br />

Freewill <strong>Baptist</strong> defenders: “The Freewill <strong>Baptist</strong> connection in North America<br />

commenced A.D. 1780, in which year its first church was organized.” f1036 .<br />

From history and its own confession the Free-will <strong>Baptist</strong> sect is certainly of<br />

modern origin.<br />

The Six Principle “<strong>Baptist</strong>s” are of the seventeenth century — Rev. A.D.<br />

Williams, their representative, beingwitness. f1037 They being Arminian in<br />

showing <strong>Baptist</strong>s have ever been Calvinists, the foregoing chapters, have<br />

demonstrated them not in the line of <strong>Church</strong> <strong>Perpetuity</strong>. The so-called<br />

“German <strong>Baptist</strong>s” or Tunkers thus originated in Germany, in 1708:<br />

“The first constituents were Alexander Mack and wife, John Kipin and wife,<br />

George Grevy, Andreas Bhony, Lucas Fetter and Joanna Nethigum. They<br />

agreed to read the Bible together, and edify one another in the way they had<br />

been brought up, for as yet they did not know there were any <strong>Baptist</strong>s in the<br />

world. However, believers’ baptism and a Congregational church soon gained<br />

on them, insomuch that they were determined to obey the gospel in these<br />

matters. They desired Alexander Mack to baptize them, but he deemed<br />

himself in reality unbaptized, refused, upon which they cast lots to find who<br />

should be the administrator; on whom the lot fell hath been carefully<br />

concealed. However, baptized they were in the river Eder, by Schwartzenau,<br />

and then formed themselves into a church, choosing Alexander Mack as their<br />

minister.” f1038

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!