Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist
Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist
1816, ‘17 and ‘18 that body sent delegates to the general meeting of correspondence, and in 1816 Elder George Roberts, one of the ministers of this association, was the Moderator of the general meeting of correspondence of which Robert T. Daniel was the agent, and which developed into the North Carolina Baptist State Convention. In 1818 this association sent $32-45 to the North Carolina Missionary Society by the hands of Bro. John Campbell. And what is still more remarkable, there was a very prosperous Woman’s Mission Society in this Association, the minutes of which, kept by John Campbell, show that the “Hyco Female Cent Society” was formed at Tynch’s Creek meeting house, in County Caswell, in October, 1816; in March, 1817, it met at Bush Arbor meeting house; in March, 1818, it met at the same place; in 1819 at Grave’s meeting house, and the fifth annual meeting was held in September, 1820, at Arbor; all of these churches are now anti-mission, but were then missionary bodies, and the persons who preached the annual sermons, R. Dishong, J. Landus, Barzillar Graves, Abner W. Clopton and S. Chandler, were all Missionary Baptist ministers- In 1832 the County Line Association was in regular correspondence with the Flat River and Sandy Creek associations, both of which were then and still are missionary bodies. In 1832 James Osborne, of Baltimore, visited this association, and under his presence it was induced to withdraw fellowship from the Missionary Baptists. Now, from this brief statement of unvarnished facts we see that the Missionary Baptists are just where the Apostles were and where all of the name were till 1827-8 when a new set arose, calling themselves, according to Elder Bennett’s Review, page 8, at first, The Reformed Baptists in North Carolina, and then the Old Baptists, the Old Sort of Baptists, Baptists of the Old Stamp, and finally adopted the name of the Primitive Baptists. There are many things about these brethren which I like, and I would not needlessly call them by an offensive name, but I cannot style them either Old School or Primitive Baptists, for in so doing I should falsify the facts of history, and acknowledge that I and my brethren have departed from the faith of the Apostles and Baptist fathers. In no invidious sense, therefore, but from necessity, I am obliged to call them New School or Anti-missionary Baptists. f1027 After years of pretty thorough and careful reading I have been unable to read the name of even one church, association or writer that ever opposed missions or education before about 1810.
As there is no difference in doctrine between what are called Missionary Baptists and what are called Anti-mission Baptists, I notice only that which really divides them — missions, education, support of pastors and other religious enterprises. To be sure, the Anti-mission Baptists have often run the doctrine of Divine Sovereignty and Election into fanaticism and other errors. But the Regular Baptists, by the Arminians among them, have equalled their errors. So neither can well throw up errors of doctrine to the other. I conclude this part of the chapter in the language of David Benedict, “a leading Baptist historian:” “Old School and Primitive Baptists are appellations so entirely out of place that I cannot, as a matter of courtesy, use them without adding, so-called, or some such expression. I have seen so much of the missionary spirit among the old Anabaptists, Waldenses and other ancient sects — so vigorous and perpetual were the efforts of those Christians, whom we claim as Baptists, in the early, middle and late ages, to spread the gospel in all parts of the world, among all nations and languages where they could gain access, that it is plain that those who merely preach up predestination, and do nothing, have no f1031 f1028 f1029 claim to be called by their name.” Turning to the Freewill “Baptists,” in the foregoing chapters we have seen that Baptists of past ages have been what are denominated “Calvinistic” Baptists. f1030 The “Communion Question” being one fundamental difference between the Freewill “Baptists” and the Regular Baptists, I will briefly notice it. The Baptist Confession, of 1643, printed in London, Anno 1646 “reads that, disciples” ought to be baptized, and after to partake of the Lord’s Supper.” f1032 The Confession of 1689 reads: “Baptism and the Lord’s Supper are ordinances of positive and sovereign institution, appointed by the Lord Jesus, the only law giver, to be continued in his church to the end of the world … to be administered by those who are qualified and thereunto called according to the commission of Christ.” f1033 Replying to an open communionist, an anonymous critical historian, f1034 in the Examiner, near twenty years ago, said: “They cannot bring a single Confession of Faith from all Baptist history before the rise of the Free-will Baptists, about one hundred years ago,” to prove that Baptists were formerly open communionists. “They can bring only one in all that history which appears to prove it, and that one excluded Arminians from communion, hence would exclude the authors or the main author of these assertions. All the Continental Baptist
- Page 237 and 238: (7.) Laying all this aside, I have
- Page 239 and 240: CHAPTER 24. — JOHN SMYTH’S BAPT
- Page 241 and 242: thereof. Now it is reason-able to c
- Page 243 and 244: Smith Watson, and now we cannot, at
- Page 245 and 246: Orchard’s suggestion, that Spilsb
- Page 247 and 248: CHAPTER 25. — THROUGH WELSH BAPTI
- Page 249 and 250: In the year 603, Augustine, called
- Page 251 and 252: “The vale of Olchon is difficult
- Page 253 and 254: earth can tell where the church was
- Page 255 and 256: Says Cramp: “A church was immedia
- Page 257 and 258: any others than Wickenden, Brown, e
- Page 259 and 260: Armitage says: “In view of the fa
- Page 261 and 262: No church or minister ever originat
- Page 263 and 264: Brown, Wickenden and Dexter. … Th
- Page 265 and 266: “The first certain date in their
- Page 267 and 268: Massachusetts Baptist churches thus
- Page 269 and 270: “In the year 1751, Mr. Nicholas B
- Page 271 and 272: Christian era. … He had little ec
- Page 273 and 274: organized before Williams’ church
- Page 275 and 276: fellowship any who should do these
- Page 277 and 278: (3.) To assist those members that s
- Page 279 and 280: pleased the Lord to stir up their h
- Page 281 and 282: “agreed that the churches should
- Page 283 and 284: Silas Hart, 1795, died and left to
- Page 285 and 286: letters desiring the aid of this bo
- Page 287: “Elder James Osborne was a member
- Page 291 and 292: So, without looking into their othe
- Page 293 and 294: laid on infant baptism. … We are
- Page 295 and 296: church. … I cannot be conscientio
- Page 297 and 298: spiritual choice for any souls. Hen
- Page 299 and 300: “We are surprised to learn that t
- Page 301 and 302: In defining baptizo the American ed
- Page 303 and 304: “That this is a mistranslation th
- Page 305 and 306: M. T. Yates and A.B. Cabaniss are a
- Page 307 and 308: the rate of 99 per cent.; Campbelli
- Page 309 and 310: THE FOLLOWING FROM THE BAPTIST YEAR
- Page 311 and 312: property, their good name, their li
- Page 313 and 314: doctrinal or practical word, they h
- Page 315 and 316: CHAPTER 29. — ST. PATRICK A BAPTI
- Page 317 and 318: crowned in A.D. 1057. When Collier
- Page 319 and 320: Thus, first, Irish monasteries were
- Page 321 and 322: REVELATION 20:2. ROMISH CHURCH TREE
- Page 323 and 324: FOOTNOTES ft1 In this list I have n
- Page 325 and 326: seed.” The “invisible” notion
- Page 327 and 328: ft95 From wieder, meaning again, an
- Page 329 and 330: y aspersion, in the bed in whirl’
- Page 331 and 332: ft182 Israel of the Alps, vol. 1, p
- Page 333 and 334: ft245 Robinson’s Eccl. Researches
- Page 335 and 336: ft300 Kurtz’s Chr. Hist., vol. 1,
- Page 337 and 338: Proverbs 28:26; Genesis 6:5; 8:21;
1816, ‘17 and ‘18 that body sent delegates to the general meeting of<br />
correspondence, and in 1816 Elder George Roberts, one of the ministers of this<br />
association, was the Moderator of the general meeting of correspondence of<br />
which Robert T. Daniel was the agent, and which developed into the North<br />
Carolina <strong>Baptist</strong> State Convention. In 1818 this association sent $32-45 to the<br />
North Carolina Missionary Society by the hands of Bro. John Campbell.<br />
And what is still more remarkable, there was a very prosperous Woman’s<br />
Mission Society in this Association, the minutes of which, kept by John<br />
Campbell, show that the “Hyco Female Cent Society” was formed at Tynch’s<br />
Creek meeting house, in County Caswell, in October, 1816; in March, 1817, it<br />
met at Bush Arbor meeting house; in March, 1818, it met at the same place; in<br />
1819 at Grave’s meeting house, and the fifth annual meeting was held in<br />
September, 1820, at Arbor; all of these churches are now anti-mission, but<br />
were then missionary bodies, and the persons who preached the annual<br />
sermons, R. Dishong, J. Landus, Barzillar Graves, Abner W. Clopton and S.<br />
Chandler, were all Missionary <strong>Baptist</strong> ministers-<br />
In 1832 the County Line Association was in regular correspondence with the<br />
Flat River and Sandy Creek associations, both of which were then and still are<br />
missionary bodies.<br />
In 1832 James Osborne, of Baltimore, visited this association, and under his<br />
presence it was induced to withdraw fellowship from the Missionary <strong>Baptist</strong>s.<br />
Now, from this brief statement of unvarnished facts we see that the Missionary<br />
<strong>Baptist</strong>s are just where the Apostles were and where all of the name were till<br />
1827-8 when a new set arose, calling themselves, according to Elder Bennett’s<br />
Review, page 8, at first, The Reformed <strong>Baptist</strong>s in North Carolina, and then the<br />
Old <strong>Baptist</strong>s, the Old Sort of <strong>Baptist</strong>s, <strong>Baptist</strong>s of the Old Stamp, and finally<br />
adopted the name of the Primitive <strong>Baptist</strong>s.<br />
There are many things about these brethren which I like, and I would not<br />
needlessly call them by an offensive name, but I cannot style them either Old<br />
School or Primitive <strong>Baptist</strong>s, for in so doing I should falsify the facts of<br />
history, and acknowledge that I and my brethren have departed from the faith<br />
of the Apostles and <strong>Baptist</strong> fathers. In no invidious sense, therefore, but from<br />
necessity, I am obliged to call them New School or Anti-missionary <strong>Baptist</strong>s.<br />
f1027<br />
After years of pretty thorough and careful reading I have been unable to read<br />
the name of even one church, association or writer that ever opposed missions<br />
or education before about 1810.