Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist

Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist Jarrel - Baptist Church Perpetuity - Landmark Baptist

landmarkbaptist.org
from landmarkbaptist.org More from this publisher
09.02.2013 Views

1816, ‘17 and ‘18 that body sent delegates to the general meeting of correspondence, and in 1816 Elder George Roberts, one of the ministers of this association, was the Moderator of the general meeting of correspondence of which Robert T. Daniel was the agent, and which developed into the North Carolina Baptist State Convention. In 1818 this association sent $32-45 to the North Carolina Missionary Society by the hands of Bro. John Campbell. And what is still more remarkable, there was a very prosperous Woman’s Mission Society in this Association, the minutes of which, kept by John Campbell, show that the “Hyco Female Cent Society” was formed at Tynch’s Creek meeting house, in County Caswell, in October, 1816; in March, 1817, it met at Bush Arbor meeting house; in March, 1818, it met at the same place; in 1819 at Grave’s meeting house, and the fifth annual meeting was held in September, 1820, at Arbor; all of these churches are now anti-mission, but were then missionary bodies, and the persons who preached the annual sermons, R. Dishong, J. Landus, Barzillar Graves, Abner W. Clopton and S. Chandler, were all Missionary Baptist ministers- In 1832 the County Line Association was in regular correspondence with the Flat River and Sandy Creek associations, both of which were then and still are missionary bodies. In 1832 James Osborne, of Baltimore, visited this association, and under his presence it was induced to withdraw fellowship from the Missionary Baptists. Now, from this brief statement of unvarnished facts we see that the Missionary Baptists are just where the Apostles were and where all of the name were till 1827-8 when a new set arose, calling themselves, according to Elder Bennett’s Review, page 8, at first, The Reformed Baptists in North Carolina, and then the Old Baptists, the Old Sort of Baptists, Baptists of the Old Stamp, and finally adopted the name of the Primitive Baptists. There are many things about these brethren which I like, and I would not needlessly call them by an offensive name, but I cannot style them either Old School or Primitive Baptists, for in so doing I should falsify the facts of history, and acknowledge that I and my brethren have departed from the faith of the Apostles and Baptist fathers. In no invidious sense, therefore, but from necessity, I am obliged to call them New School or Anti-missionary Baptists. f1027 After years of pretty thorough and careful reading I have been unable to read the name of even one church, association or writer that ever opposed missions or education before about 1810.

As there is no difference in doctrine between what are called Missionary Baptists and what are called Anti-mission Baptists, I notice only that which really divides them — missions, education, support of pastors and other religious enterprises. To be sure, the Anti-mission Baptists have often run the doctrine of Divine Sovereignty and Election into fanaticism and other errors. But the Regular Baptists, by the Arminians among them, have equalled their errors. So neither can well throw up errors of doctrine to the other. I conclude this part of the chapter in the language of David Benedict, “a leading Baptist historian:” “Old School and Primitive Baptists are appellations so entirely out of place that I cannot, as a matter of courtesy, use them without adding, so-called, or some such expression. I have seen so much of the missionary spirit among the old Anabaptists, Waldenses and other ancient sects — so vigorous and perpetual were the efforts of those Christians, whom we claim as Baptists, in the early, middle and late ages, to spread the gospel in all parts of the world, among all nations and languages where they could gain access, that it is plain that those who merely preach up predestination, and do nothing, have no f1031 f1028 f1029 claim to be called by their name.” Turning to the Freewill “Baptists,” in the foregoing chapters we have seen that Baptists of past ages have been what are denominated “Calvinistic” Baptists. f1030 The “Communion Question” being one fundamental difference between the Freewill “Baptists” and the Regular Baptists, I will briefly notice it. The Baptist Confession, of 1643, printed in London, Anno 1646 “reads that, disciples” ought to be baptized, and after to partake of the Lord’s Supper.” f1032 The Confession of 1689 reads: “Baptism and the Lord’s Supper are ordinances of positive and sovereign institution, appointed by the Lord Jesus, the only law giver, to be continued in his church to the end of the world … to be administered by those who are qualified and thereunto called according to the commission of Christ.” f1033 Replying to an open communionist, an anonymous critical historian, f1034 in the Examiner, near twenty years ago, said: “They cannot bring a single Confession of Faith from all Baptist history before the rise of the Free-will Baptists, about one hundred years ago,” to prove that Baptists were formerly open communionists. “They can bring only one in all that history which appears to prove it, and that one excluded Arminians from communion, hence would exclude the authors or the main author of these assertions. All the Continental Baptist

1816, ‘17 and ‘18 that body sent delegates to the general meeting of<br />

correspondence, and in 1816 Elder George Roberts, one of the ministers of this<br />

association, was the Moderator of the general meeting of correspondence of<br />

which Robert T. Daniel was the agent, and which developed into the North<br />

Carolina <strong>Baptist</strong> State Convention. In 1818 this association sent $32-45 to the<br />

North Carolina Missionary Society by the hands of Bro. John Campbell.<br />

And what is still more remarkable, there was a very prosperous Woman’s<br />

Mission Society in this Association, the minutes of which, kept by John<br />

Campbell, show that the “Hyco Female Cent Society” was formed at Tynch’s<br />

Creek meeting house, in County Caswell, in October, 1816; in March, 1817, it<br />

met at Bush Arbor meeting house; in March, 1818, it met at the same place; in<br />

1819 at Grave’s meeting house, and the fifth annual meeting was held in<br />

September, 1820, at Arbor; all of these churches are now anti-mission, but<br />

were then missionary bodies, and the persons who preached the annual<br />

sermons, R. Dishong, J. Landus, Barzillar Graves, Abner W. Clopton and S.<br />

Chandler, were all Missionary <strong>Baptist</strong> ministers-<br />

In 1832 the County Line Association was in regular correspondence with the<br />

Flat River and Sandy Creek associations, both of which were then and still are<br />

missionary bodies.<br />

In 1832 James Osborne, of Baltimore, visited this association, and under his<br />

presence it was induced to withdraw fellowship from the Missionary <strong>Baptist</strong>s.<br />

Now, from this brief statement of unvarnished facts we see that the Missionary<br />

<strong>Baptist</strong>s are just where the Apostles were and where all of the name were till<br />

1827-8 when a new set arose, calling themselves, according to Elder Bennett’s<br />

Review, page 8, at first, The Reformed <strong>Baptist</strong>s in North Carolina, and then the<br />

Old <strong>Baptist</strong>s, the Old Sort of <strong>Baptist</strong>s, <strong>Baptist</strong>s of the Old Stamp, and finally<br />

adopted the name of the Primitive <strong>Baptist</strong>s.<br />

There are many things about these brethren which I like, and I would not<br />

needlessly call them by an offensive name, but I cannot style them either Old<br />

School or Primitive <strong>Baptist</strong>s, for in so doing I should falsify the facts of<br />

history, and acknowledge that I and my brethren have departed from the faith<br />

of the Apostles and <strong>Baptist</strong> fathers. In no invidious sense, therefore, but from<br />

necessity, I am obliged to call them New School or Anti-missionary <strong>Baptist</strong>s.<br />

f1027<br />

After years of pretty thorough and careful reading I have been unable to read<br />

the name of even one church, association or writer that ever opposed missions<br />

or education before about 1810.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!